Andrew Garfield interview: ‘It looks cool, but actually having to save New York City is knackering’

As The Amazing Spider-Man 2 crawls into theaters this month, we ask leading man Andrew Garfield to delve inside Peter Parker’s psyche and reveal seven things that make Spidey tick



Add +

Photograph: © Paola Kudacki

In 2012, Andrew Garfield looked like a man about to have root-canal surgery. Which is less enthusiasm than you’d expect from an actor on the brink of becoming the superstar face of a Hollywood mega-franchise. It turns out Garfield was seriously freaked out by all the attention: the life-changing, no-going-back-ness of being famous.

Two years later, squeezing back into costume for The Amazing Spider-Man 2, the British actor is as protective of his privacy as ever—still not answering questions about his real-life girlfriend Emma Stone (who plays Peter Parker’s ladylove Gwen Stacy). But this time he’s relaxed and smiling. Now 30 (“Am I a young man still? Or can I just say ‘man’?”), he seems to have shed a little of the self-doubt and mellowed, though he still brings that jumpy little-brother energy to Spidey.

“If I had had these opportunities when I was younger, I would have been Justin Bieber”

“I actually had more confidence for the second film because Spider-Man is more confident,” he says thoughtfully. “When Peter puts on the spandex he gets to save people’s lives. When he’s just Peter, he’s got to deal with just being Peter. It’s the same with me. When I’m not acting, I have to deal with myself and I go a bit crazy.”

As for fame, Garfield is just glad it came later on. “If I had had these opportunities when I was younger, I would have been Justin Bieber,” he says. “If you are a 16-year-old kid and you can do whatever you want, you’re making trillions of dollars and you have a leopard-print Ferrari, it’s not healthy. If I was going through what I’m going through now when I was 16, I might have ended up in jail.”

“I don’t want to be a 50-year-old in spandex”

With the second installment of the arachnoid blockbuster under his belt, Garfield is maturing into an expert on the character, as he proved when we quizzed him on all things Spider-Man. But how many more Spidey movies has he really got left in him?

“I can only do ten. No, seriously, I signed up to do three. Never say never. But I don’t want to be a 50-year-old in spandex.”


Spider-Man is neurotic.

“Peter Parker is not a simple dude. He can’t just switch off. He never feels like he’s doing enough. And Peter suffers from self-doubt. He ums and ahs about his future because he’s neurotic. It’s a defining feature. He’s an over-thinker. It would be much easier if he was a life-saving robot.”


Being Spider-Man is a hassle.

“It looks cool, but actually having to save New York City is knackering. And you can’t save everyone. People die. That’s a lot to deal with. Peter feels responsible for people dying and getting hurt. It’s really crazy responsibility. It’s a tough calling.”


He is misunderstood.

“Peter is not that evolved. Peter wants to tell the world he’s a good guy: ‘Like me: I’m nice.’ He’s a 19 year old kid. He’s a kid struggling with being misunderstood. We’ve all been misunderstood. That’s universal too. I like being Peter.”


Peter is a nerd.

“Back in the day, being a nerd meant you were an outcast. You weren’t going to get the girl. You got a wedgie or got called names. Now the nerd is a billionaire. Nerds are running the world. They won. It’s a cool thing. But what I think makes Spider-Man a better superhero is his sensitivity. He’s not a shallow guy. He is an everyman and that’s what I’ve always loved about him.”


Being an underdog means that he can protect the underdog.

“If I hadn’t been bullied at school I wouldn’t have needed Spider-Man. It wasn’t crazy-abusive, just one guy in the playground wanting to pick on someone and seeing the super-skinny, sensitive kid. I’m still super-skinny and sensitive. Strangely, I’m grateful for the bullying I experienced. Being a skinny, sensitive young man means that I found acting. Peter Parker is protecting a part of himself: The five-year-old boy inside that got bullied in the playground.”


A good dose of therapy would be very beneficial.

“I don’t know of any father and son relationship that hasn’t struggled. Fathers really do have an ability to mess up their sons. And this story is really good example. It’s a cautionary tale for dads. When I become a dad, as soon as my child is born I will have messed up. As the child, you’ve got to learn to get over it, become your own person. You can’t keep blaming your mum and dad. It’s a tough road for young people. It definitely was for me.”


The three-second costume change is rubbish.

“We’re selling a false dream. When we were making the first movie, I wanted to do a little short film, which would depict me taking 15 or 20 minutes to get into the suit, with the help of three people and a giant shoehorn.”


Watch the trailer for The Amazing Spider-Man 2


Read our review of The Amazing Spider-Man 2

Rated as: 3/5 
An overlong, at times almost plot-free soap opera, the latest Spidey adventure never comes together as a story.

Read the full review for The Amazing Spider-Man 2

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 opens Fri May 2.

Watch the trailer for The Amazing Spider-Man 2

Read our review of The Amazing Spider-Man 2

Rated as: 3/5
An overlong, at times almost plot-free soap opera, the latest Spidey adventure never comes together as a story.

Read the full review for The Amazing Spider-Man 2

Users say


The best films now showing



  • Rated as: 4/5

Room is a fitting title for director Lenny Abrahamson’s potent and sensitive film about two characters who spend precious years of their lives trapped in one. But Room is also cruel shorthand for a story about two characters who aren’t afforded any. That one word expresses the grand sum of their shared universe, while also intimating the wide spectrum of the things they’ve been deprived. That duality extends to the eponymous box itself, a decrepit lawn shed serving as both prison and unlikely paradise for the mother and child locked inside. The full picture emerges slowly, details arriving like the droplets of rain that dribble onto Room’s solitary skylight. But it’s clear from the start that Joy (Brie Larson) and her preteen son, Jack (the eerily intuitive Jacob Tremblay), are forcibly confined within the gray concrete walls of their grim enclosure. For exercise, Jack tumbles back and forth between two walls. For food, a man referred to as Old Nick delivers the essentials when he slips inside to rape Joy. For sanity, Joy tells her son that "room" is all that separates them from the infinity of outer space, and for survival she’ll eventually begin to teach him the truth. (If you want to experience the film without a more explicit indication of what happens next, stop reading here.) Their inevitable escape makes for a harrowing sequence that exemplifies both the best of Larson’s raw-nerve performance and the worst of Abrahamson’s technique, which erratically fumbles between


Bridge of Spies

  • Rated as: 4/5
  • Free

Gifts of civility small and large mark Steven Spielberg's latest film, a deeply satisfying Cold War spy thriller that feels more subdued than usual for the director—even more so than 2012's philosophical Lincoln—but one that shapes up expertly into a John Le Carré–style nail-biter. In a knockout near-wordless intro, a long-faced canvas painter (Mark Rylance, magnetic) finishes an oil in his 1957 Brooklyn apartment, makes his way to the park, picks up a secret nickel under a bench containing a tiny folded document, and eventually gets nabbed by feds on his tail. He's Rudolf Abel, the real-life Soviet spy charged with espionage. But the decent, often feisty man at the film's center is James Donovan (Tom Hanks), the lawyer who, at great risk to his family, defended Abel's life as a matter of due process and integrity. One could be forgiven for finding this early stretch a touch Costnerian: Apart from cinematographer Janusz Kaminski's blooming windows, it doesn't quite feel like a Spielberg film until a burning American spy plane plunges past its parachuting pilot, Francis Gary Powers (Austin Stowell). He's about to become a Russian prisoner and a pawn in a secret trade that the government hopes Donovan will broker in a wintry Berlin split by the Wall: Abel for Powers. The verbal gamesmanship brings on a new, energized movie, beginning with Hanks's charming Donovan, slightly amused in his Irish crankiness, even as his fancy overcoat is stolen by German teens ("You know—spy stuf


Steve Jobs

  • Rated as: 4/5

Steve Jobs the movie is a lot like Steve Jobs the person: astonishingly brilliant whenever it’s not breaking your heart. Screenwriter Aaron Sorkin, who’s written about America’s Great Flawed Men with such fire and hyperarticulate pathos that he’s threatened to become one himself, outdoes his work on The Social Network with an even sharper and more savage script about a tech visionary whose genius threatens to corrupt his ethics. Meanwhile, Slumdog Millionaire director Danny Boyle—at turns an agreeably rambunctious and disastrously literal choice for this material—does his best to stay out of sight, but whenever he shows his hand, you want to smack it away. Combining the entrepreneurial narcissism of Slumdog Millionaire with the backstage mania of Birdman, Steve Jobs squeezes the Apple founder's outsized persona into three discrete story sections, each one corresponding to a product launch vibrating with the same make-or-break electricity of a Broadway show on opening night. Michael Fassbender, whose lightning-in-a-bottle performance has distilled the CEO into a nasal whine and a merciless attention to detail, sinks deeper into the role as Jobs develops into the icon he would ultimately become. The first and most flawlessly scripted slice is set in January of 1984 during the half hour before the unveiling of the initial Macintosh. Fassbender, like a coiled snake whose tail never stops rattling, is too ripped to feel fully persuasive as a burgeoning geek tyrant during this ea