Film

Movie theaters, reviews and showtimes in Chicago, plus articles, trailers and more

 

Duncan Jones reveals his 'Source Code'

Duncan Jones has followed ‘Moon’ with a glossy sci-fi movie, ‘Source Code’ – but still believes in big ideas. Nigel Floyd meets him

Listening to Duncan Jones as he talks about his fast-paced cerebral thriller ‘Source Code’, it’s striking how comfortable the 39-year-old British director is with the heady ideas that inform the best science-fiction films. The context in which he made his second film was radically different from his debut feature, the $5 million space oddity ‘Moon’, but the same challenging thoughts about time and identity inform both.

Moon’ was an indie labour of love starring only Sam Rockwell (twice) and Kevin Spacey’s voice; ‘Source Code’, while not a full-blown Hollywood studio film, is a sci-fi inflected thriller produced by Mark Gordon (‘2012’, ‘The Day After Tomorrow’) and starring Jake Gyllenhaal, Michelle Monaghan and Vera Farmiga. ‘There’s obviously a huge difference between making a small indie and directing a film with so much more money at stake,’ says Jones, who graduated from the London Film School after studying philosophy in the US. His dad, of course, is David Bowie (who called his son Zowie Bowie for a while), and Jones spent a lot of time when promoting ‘Moon’ fielding questions about his famous father.

He now realises that he’s gone up a gear very quickly in the world of filmmaking. ‘My analogy would be that it’s like the difference between driving a motor boat and captaining an oil tanker. But not having written the screenplay myself, and having come on board when the project was all ready to go, I was able to look at it objectively and say, this works great, this I’m not so sure about and these are the things we can improve. So my opinion was completely unbiased because, at least at that early stage, I had nothing invested in it.’

It was Jake Gyllenhaal, an admirer of ‘Moon’, who suggested that producer Mark Gordon should bring Jones on board. Jones admits to being reluctant to take on another science-fiction film, but he was won over by the potential of Ben Ripley’s fast-paced, non-linear screenplay. Army helicopter pilot Captain Colter Stevens (Gyllenhaal) wakes up on a train bound for Chicago. He is sitting opposite Christina (Monaghan), a friendly woman who seems to know him, but has no idea of how he got there. Confused and disoriented, he stumbles into the bathroom, where the face he sees in the mirror is not his own. Suddenly, there is an explosion and he is catapulted back to a ‘pod’ that resembles the interior of a crashed helicopter. Through video screen conversations with a ‘minder’ (Farmiga), Colter learns that he is participating in a secret military project that allows him to project himself into a parallel reality, but only for eight minutes at a time.

i1-001 SC #0303R.jpg

Jones is something of a science-fiction geek – an ad he made for a disposable Kodak camera was a pastiche of the noodle bar street scene in ‘Blade Runner’ – and so he had no real problem with this time-shift premise. He did, however, feel that it needed a little lightening up. ‘To wrap your head around the conceit behind Ben Ripley’s script takes some doing. But I thought that if it was taken too seriously, and we dedicated too much time to the science, it would detract from the film’s rip-roaring ride. So the rewriting I did was mostly to do with the tone. My suggestion to Ben was to try to inject some romance and humour, and to see if we could persuade the audience to just jump on board with the technology.’

As with ‘Moon’, Jones’s clever direction of ‘Source Code’ makes a virtue of necessity, by transforming potentially dull interiors into spaces charged with emotion. To pick just one example, because Colter is only able to enter his parallel reality for eight minutes at a time, we see several ‘Groundhog Day’-style versions of the scene in which he and Christina first meet on the train. ‘I broke down those repeated sections, and tried to ensure that each one was as visually distinct from the others as possible,’ he explains. ‘One of the reasons we didn’t film on a real train was that we had to be able to break out walls and get a variety of angles on the action. This meant that whenever something new happened, the audience was seeing an environment that looked quite different.’

Jones says he’s in talks to make a third sci-fi movie, but that doesn’t mean he wouldn’t like to try his hand with other material. ‘After the next film, I hope to take a little bit of a genre sabbatical. I’m known for sci-fi, but I’m also known for being story-driven. So hopefully that same audience will be interested in seeing how I tackle other kinds of films.’

Neither does this hankering for new genres mean that he thinks that cerebral sci-fi is in bad shape: ‘I agree with Gareth Edwards [director of “Monsters”], who said recently that we’re reaching a point now where effects are so prevalent and so good that audiences have seen everything. So they’re coming back to sci-fi for the stories it can tell and the intriguing philosophical hypotheticals that it can pose.’

Read our review of 'Source Code' here




Author: Nigel Floyd



What do you think?
Post your comment now

*mandatory fields





Features

Do overs!

Do overs!

After Race to Witch Mountain, what should Disney remake next?

Gray's anatomy

James Gray wants to push buttons—again.

The next big thing?

Gigantic Releasing tries to rethink indie distribution…without movie theaters.

Red Diva: Lyubov Orlova, First Lady of Soviet Cinema

So you think you can dance, comrade?

Puppet master

Coraline director Henry Selick takes stop-motion animation into 3-D.

Socratic method

Laurent Cantet's approach on the set matches the message of his film.

Wander woman

Kelly Reichardt's Wendy and Lucy puts a Bush-era spin on the road movie.

Oscars

Read our interviews with the nominees, our reviews of the nominated films and more.