Film

Movie theaters, reviews and showtimes in Chicago, plus articles, trailers and more

 

Related films

Related people

Was there life before 'Kick-Ass'?

The USP of Matthew Vaughn's 'Kick-Ass' is that it's about real life superheroes. But what about Mystery Men?

For the next month or so, you won’t be able to leave the house without hearing the words ‘Kick-Ass’. Matthew Vaughn’s teen superhero epic is fast, funny and extremely violent, but it also seems to be labouring under a misapprehension: that the concept of normal, everyday superheroes is somehow original. The film even opens with our hero Dave Lizewski (Aaron Johnson) complaining that, in the real world, no one but the police dresses up and fights crime.

In fact, they do. A few years ago, a film played at the Sci-Fi-London Film Festival called ‘Your Friendly Neighbourhood Hero’. This wise and very amusing doc followed the exploits of four real-life costumed avengers – known only as Superhero, Master Legend, Mr Silent and Hardware – as they plied their trade on the suburban streets where they lived. Their exploits were relatively tame – none of them took down a major crime ring or foiled a villain in his underground lair – but, like Kick-Ass, they were dedicated ordinary Joes intent on remaking society in their own image.

Even in the realm of fiction the concept of normal folks with no special talents teaming up to fight forces of evil is nothing new. Alan Moore’s graphic novel ‘Watchmen’ was perhaps the first to imagine what would happen if society was suddenly overrun with masked heroes – his conclusion being that they’d become fascistic, sexually perverse social outcasts. Last year’s film version of Moore's book turned the idea on its head by becoming exactly the kind of ultraviolent bonanza of special effects which Moore was satirising in the first place.

A decade ago, 'Mystery Men' brought the very same concept which fuels ‘Kick-Ass’ – give or take a few vaguely supernatural elements – into cinemas, and was largely ignored by the ticket-buying public. It’s a shame, because Kinka Usher’s film was a smart, original and hilarious subversion of the superhero genre which deserves a second look.

Just check out the cast list for 'Mystery Men': Ben Stiller plays Mr Furious, an ordinary guy convinced that his boundless inner rage makes him in some way special. Hank Azaria plays The Blue Raja, master of cutlery, while William H Macy brings his customary hapless warmth to the role of family man The Shoveller. There’s also room for Greg Kinnear as preening playboy Captain Amazing, Geoffrey Rush as master villain Casanova Frankenstein, Eddie Izzard as his sidekick Tony P, Janeane Garofalo as hipster hero The Bowler and the great Tom Waits as madcap inventor Doc Heller.

Sure, ‘Mystery Men’ plays things a lot broader and wackier than ‘Kick-Ass’. But it’s also sharper, more inventive and a lot funnier, taking the time to round out its lovingly drawn characters rather than just chucking them into another limb-slicing action sequence.

We’ve no doubt that ‘Kick-Ass’ is going to be a big box-office success. It’s got all the wisecracking, foul language and manic, intense violence that fanboys go nuts for. But once you’ve paid your money and got your kicks, give ‘Mystery Men’ a go: it would be a shame if this big-hearted, anarchic anti-blockbuster got lost in the shadow of its slicker but somehow less loveable offspring.

Author: Tom Huddleston



User comments on this story

  • Dave said...
    ok, just a quick question to the critic Tom Huddleston have you ever read Watchmen or indeed Kick - Ass? Don't mean to come across as snotty but the Watchmen film stuck incredibly close to the source material and let us not forget that the novel itself is visually stunning also, it also wasn't an effects bonanza most casual moviegoers didn't get it and it wasn't exactly a mega success. Watchmen is still a satire on the superhero mythos or didn't you notice that with the film? Anyway the same applies to Kick - Ass the books are ultra violent so why shouldn't the film be the same, if something sticks closely and respectfully to it's source material we should be pleased with it. However the point about Mystery Men I do agree with 100% you said it! Ace Film and again the material it came from was also gold! Posted on Mar 31 2010 13:33
    Report as inappropriate
  • kerry said...
    ... bought MM on impulse in some Tesco bargain bin years ago and thought it was a hoot! Couldn't work out why I'd never seen or heard of it before, especially given its cast. There are fabulous LOL moments all through MM - Hank Azaria is particularly good. I'm totally with Tom on this one - if the kiss-ass anti-genre film works for you, MM really shouldn't be missed ... we won't mention 'superhero movie' tho - blech! Posted on Mar 28 2010 10:43
    Report as inappropriate

What do you think?
Post your comment now

*mandatory fields





Features

Do overs!

Do overs!

After Race to Witch Mountain, what should Disney remake next?

Gray's anatomy

James Gray wants to push buttons—again.

The next big thing?

Gigantic Releasing tries to rethink indie distribution…without movie theaters.

Red Diva: Lyubov Orlova, First Lady of Soviet Cinema

So you think you can dance, comrade?

Puppet master

Coraline director Henry Selick takes stop-motion animation into 3-D.

Socratic method

Laurent Cantet's approach on the set matches the message of his film.

Wander woman

Kelly Reichardt's Wendy and Lucy puts a Bush-era spin on the road movie.

Oscars

Read our interviews with the nominees, our reviews of the nominated films and more.