Film

Movie theaters, reviews and showtimes in Chicago, plus articles, trailers and more

 

3:10 to Yuma (2007)

Director: James Mangold

2

Critics' rating

Average user rating
2 reviews

Movie review

From Time Out Chicago

Given that Crowe and Bale are far better actors than Glenn Ford and Van Heflin, why isn’t the 2007 version of this classic Western superior to its 1957 predecessor? The scenario, based on an Elmore Leonard story, remains essentially unchanged: Eager for a $200 reward, a struggling rancher (Bale/Heflin) pledges to escort a notorious bandit (Crowe/Ford) to the train that will take the latter to jail, but must contend with the bad man’s pursuing henchmen.

The inferiority of the remake can be expressed numerically, as a function of its bloated bullet-to-injury ratio. Of the 12 shots fired in the 1957 version, five find their mark, resulting in a pleasingly lethal BTI score of 2.4. In the remake, approximately 8 trillion rounds are fired (we lost count during the Gatling gun sequences), of which maybe 80 hit home, resulting in a loud, soporific score of 100,000,000,000—ten times the Peckinpah Constant!

Comparable inflation undermines the bad guy’s effectiveness. As played by Ford, outlaw Ben Wade was shrewd and ruthless but human. Here, he’s Hannibal Lecter in a Stetson, a Scripture-quoting superman capable of killing his captors any time he likes. And when he’s belatedly given a ridiculously sentimental motive for submitting to captivity, we heard Lee Van Cleef puking down from gunslinger heaven.

Author: Cliff Doerksen 2007-09-04 18:49:32

Time Out Chicago Issue 132: September 6–12, 2007


  • Print this page
  • Send to a friend

User reviews of this film

  • Jan said...
    Posted on Jan 20 2008 21:13 Agree with your review. I fast-forwarded through the DVD's ending, I was that bored. I love Crowe in anything but this part had a huge motivational chunk missing and I didn't buy it. Too much shooting gets old. I wish the script had allowed for a stronger agent of change in Crowe's character. If one wants this film to be about coming of age then the main character should've been the boy. As it stood, I just kept thinking the kid would suffer the rest of his life from PTSS. Started out good, but quickly unraveled into a bloody mess.
    Report as inappropriate
  • Chelsea said...
    Posted on Sep 07 2007 23:57 I cannot believe a solid 1/3 of this review whined about the discharged ammo in relation to the body count. As every true Western fan knows, the underlying message of the story takes precedence over the actual action. Christian Bale is a war vetern turned rancher, not the jaw-dropping gunslinger-by-trade that Russell Crowe embodies. This film is about honor, coming of age, and the importance of doing the right thing - much loftier points than how many bullets were fired.
    Report as inappropriate

What do you think?
Post your review now

clear rating
Min 1 star. Zero stars will be treated as unrated.

*mandatory fields


Related articles




Features

Do overs!

Do overs!

After Race to Witch Mountain, what should Disney remake next?

Gray's anatomy

James Gray wants to push buttons—again.

The next big thing?

Gigantic Releasing tries to rethink indie distribution…without movie theaters.

Red Diva: Lyubov Orlova, First Lady of Soviet Cinema

So you think you can dance, comrade?

Puppet master

Coraline director Henry Selick takes stop-motion animation into 3-D.

Socratic method

Laurent Cantet's approach on the set matches the message of his film.

Wander woman

Kelly Reichardt's Wendy and Lucy puts a Bush-era spin on the road movie.

Oscars

Read our interviews with the nominees, our reviews of the nominated films and more.