Film

What's on at the cinema plus reviews of the latest movie and DVD releases


Sylvain Chomet: the trials of making 'The Illusionist'

The stunning new animation from ‘Belleville Rendez-Vous’ director Sylvain Chomet is based on an old Jacques Tati script. He tells Trevor Johnston how its making unearthed secrets in Tati’s family

On the train down to Cannes in 2003, where his frolicsome animated feature ‘Belleville Rendez-Vous’ was having its world premiere, writer-director Sylvain Chomet had some reading to do. He had a document other filmmakers would kill for, a never-filmed script by French comedy great Jacques Tati, the director, writer and star of ‘Monsieur Hulot’s Holiday’ and ‘Playtime’. However, Chomet recalls that his attitude was far from reverent: ‘I hoped it was crap.’

‘I didn’t want to do an adaptation,’ explains the Paris-born animator. ‘I wanted to make my own stories. I was ready to give it back to the Tati estate, but that didn’t happen. It was just so strong. I could see the whole movie already, and that’s such a gift.’
A gift indeed, and Chomet has spent the intervening years turning ‘The Illusionist’ into pure pleasure for us. Deliberately old-fashioned in its hand-drawn detail, even radical in its gentle pace, this poignant story follows a struggling magician in the dying, late-’50s days of variety, tracing his fatherly relationship with a waif-like young girl who joins him on his travels. The result is a startling combination of pictorial loveliness and wonderful melancholy. It’s nothing less than a modern classic, though it hasn’t been achieved without a few bumps and scrapes along the way…

Ever since Chomet approached Les Films de Mon Oncle – the Paris company run by the late Sophie Tatischeff to keep her father Jacques Tati’s flame alive – to use some Tati footage in ‘Belleville Rendez-Vous’, his fortunes have been linked with the Tati legacy. It has also brought him an unexpected share of controversy, since troubled domestic issues in Tati’s past have come to haunt Chomet’s new film.

Chomet never met or even spoke to Tatischeff, who died in 2001, but sets great store by the confidence shown in him by her colleagues, who gave him the script with the wish that ‘the cinema of Tati must be alive’. Thanks to Chomet and his animators, Tati inhabits the screen again in ‘The Illusionist’, since its central character, a down-on-his-luck magician billed as ‘Tatischeff’, reflects the loping gait and befuddlement of Monsieur Hulot. Indeed, the connection between the two runs deep: Chomet recognises the influence of ‘Playtime’ on his desire for gorgeously composed, long-held wide shots which leave us to find our own way round the frame.

The Illusionist 50.JPG

‘Tati hated close-ups, and there aren’t any in this film,’ Chomet points out. ‘It’s something young viewers might take some getting used to, because there’s no fast-cutting. It’s not like an amusement park ride. So they’ll have to slow down, to let the emotion work on them.’

The beauty and immersive detail of the images, whether the changing skies over Edinburgh or a steam train beside a Scottish loch, cast their own spell – and they’re very much Chomet’s doing, since Tati’s original story was set in Prague. A visit to the film festival in Edinburgh in 2003 was enough to have Chomet and his producer wife fall in love with the Scottish capital and move their entire operation there. Fittingly, ‘The Illusionist’ opened this year’s film festival, screening to applause in the very same venue where the Tatischeff character in the film performs for a few stragglers. However, the rumour mill hinted at acrimony during the film’s gestation, something Chomet puts down to ‘some people with a, shall we say, Hollywood sensibility who wanted the délicat things to be cut’ – and he credits co-producer Pathé for supporting him.

Unknown to Chomet, though, he was also walking into another battle. What he didn’t realise at the time of reading the script was that Tati had had an illegitimate daughter during the war, Helga Marie-Jeanne Schiel, whom he abandoned and never recognised. In turn, her son, Richard McDonald, has conducted a campaign alleging that the script for ‘The Illusionist’ is long-overdue recognition for his mother, so he is incensed at Chomet’s dedication of the film to Sophie Tatischeff. Chomet’s response is: ‘I’m not the Tati estate and this has nothing to do with my work.’ But he adds that ‘the script was written around the time of Tati’s film “Mon Oncle”, so he was away a lot from home and feeling as if he would wake up one day and Sophie, his little girl, would be a woman.

‘That’s what the film is about,’ he maintains. ‘Not knowing what to do as a father. My daughter was 12 when we started and now she’s 18. I put a lot of my experiences into the film, because if you’re going to tell this story, you have to have lived it. It can’t be about someone you haven’t ever spent time with.’

The Illusionist’ opens Fri Aug 20.

Author: Trevor Johnston



User comments on this story

  • R harrison said...
    The artwork was good, the story ok, and it cost and lost a lot of money. Money that could have been used to bomb the hell out of iran and afghanistan or feed and heal the sick of this world. The film lacked violence and depravity that is why it didn't make money. Anyway I liked it! And the world doesn't deserve anything better. Posted on Jan 10 2012 08:42
    Report as inappropriate
  • Joe J said...
    Yes, RTC's comments: "Tati was never so crude or so unfunny" pretty much sums it up; no matter how much 1950s cultural paraphernalia Chomet crams into this movie (and trust me; its a LOT) its not going to make it any better. That people praise this film so much confirms nothing else than wanna-be film-aficionado'ism transposed embarrassingly onto a empty trash-can of disengaging, incoherent and depressing french mumble-jumble. Where's the warmth and magic? Posted on Sep 18 2010 22:13
    Report as inappropriate
  • RTC said...
    If Chomet had only told the story of Tati’s eldest daughter the movie would of had far more depth and actually have a purpose rather than being the irrelevant stroll that stands now. Hardly a homage to the great man that Chomet had intended, why all the grotesque caricatures? Tati was never so crude or so unfunny. Posted on Aug 31 2010 13:42
    Report as inappropriate
  • P Chambers said...
    Pathe Pictures, the same morally high standing company that exploited the slumdog child actors before dumping them back into the slums of Mumbai.
    Exploiting a pensioner’s misfortune must be small change to this lot. Posted on Aug 19 2010 02:53
    Report as inappropriate
  • P Chambers said...
    Pathe Pictures, is that not the same morally high standing company that exploited the slumdog child actors before dumping them back into the slums of Mumbai.
    Exploiting a pensioner’s misfortune must be small change to this lot. Posted on Aug 19 2010 02:05
    Report as inappropriate
  • Barbara said...
    Why was the orginal script set in Prague. Did Tati have some connection with that city? Some should really ask the director that question. Posted on Aug 17 2010 20:23
    Report as inappropriate
  • Barbara Douglas said...
    Why was the original script set in Prague? Did he have some kind of connection with that city? Someone really should ask the director. Posted on Aug 17 2010 20:21
    Report as inappropriate
  • Zone12 said...
    The true account of why Tati had wrote The Illusionist by Tati's Grandson.
    http :// tinyurl .com/28c9avc Posted on Aug 17 2010 13:59
    Report as inappropriate
  • Zone12 said...
    Would that be Chomets daughter he doesn't live with and doesn't see as he is separated from her mother? For Chomets information Mon Oncle was made just outside of Paris not far from Tati family home, Sophie spent mosty of the time it was being filmed on set. The only daughter he was away from was his eldest daughter Helga Marie-Jeanne who he had fathered during the Second World War whilst performing in the music halls of Paris. Tatis Grandson to Helga Marie-Jeanne has published the true historical account of Tati’s Illusionist script over on Roger Edberts site and makes a fascinating reading that questions Chomets spiteful motives behind his adaptation. Posted on Aug 17 2010 13:53
    Report as inappropriate
9 user comments

What do you think?
Post your comment now

*mandatory fields




Most popular on this site


Top Stories

Has David Cronenberg turned tame?

Has David Cronenberg turned tame?

Has director David Cronenberg veered too far from his radical and bloody roots with new film 'A Dangerous Method'?

Pop-up cinema for Valentine's Day

Pop-up cinema for Valentine's Day

Side-step romantic clichés with some alternative Valentine’s viewing

The 10 worst date movies

The 10 worst date movies

Just in time for Valentine's Day, we present ten of the least romantic films ever made

10 unlikely badboy biopics

10 unlikely badboy biopics

Featuring Phil Collins, Jeremy Clarkson, Nick Clegg, David Starkey and a host of other unlikely subjects

Interview: Sean Durkin on 'Martha Marcy May Marlene'

Interview: Sean Durkin on 'Martha Marcy May Marlene'

The first-time director of the brilliant new thriller discusses religious cults and robot boxing