Film
What's on at the cinema plus reviews of the latest movie and DVD releases
Short change
LFF short film programmer Philip Ilson declares 'Death to Short Film'!
Nov 3 2006
As a short-film programmer for both the London Film Festival and the Halloween Short Film Festival, I've waded through many sacks of short films over the past months. I've watched thousands of DVDs and a few old-school VHS tapes. This is all good. It's obvious that the world of filmmaking is alive and well. But there's a downside: cheaper and easier access to cameras and editing equipment means that the activity is no longer restricted to the select few who have gone through traditional training. These days, it feels like everyone and his dog has a short film inside them, not least because of the proliferation of open-access websites, screening opportunities and film festivals.
It's time to take a cold, hard look at this filmmaking overkill. It's time to do the punk-rock thing and sweep aside the old guard. It's time to stop the onslaught of short film as we know it. In short, it's time for a manifesto. Its intention? To assassinate short film and simultaneously inspire a phoenix-like rebirth.
1) Short films must not be calling cards designed to get work in features or television.
This is the most important point for any discerning maker of short films. There are thousands of media students waiting to break into television to direct soaps, comedy or drama, alongside many film school students graduating and wanting to hit Hollywood and gain Oscar glory. How can anyone compete? Screw 'em all! The only thing that exists for you is your current short film. Harbour no secret dreams of directing 'EastEnders' or walking up the red carpet. Stay focused on the job in hand.
2) Short films must not be about showcasing cinematography, editing or other technical skills.
You are the director. You must make your film exactly as you want. If you need a ten-minute single cloud shot mid-film, that's your choice. You don't need to prove anything to anyone except yourself. If a scene needs a fast complex edit, then do it, but remember it's because the scene needs it and not because you want to show off your new Final Cut Pro skills.
3) Short films must not have an optimum running time; they can last a few seconds or much longer.
Films should exist in their own time-space continuum. No one should tell you it has to fit into a specific slot. Short films are as long as they need to be to tell their story or play out their scenario. (NB Festival programmers may have a problem with this point. Tough luck.)
4) Short films must not have endings that tie everything up, but should feel as though their story could continue after the credits roll.
This is the Raymond Carver rule: think slices of life and powerful scenarios. So many short films think they need a punchline, a final joke or a 'Sixth Sense'-style twist to tie things up neatly and make the audience go away contented. But it's not necessary. How many more times do we have to hear that collective groan in a darkened cinema as the film comes to a close? We want to reflect on a character's life or to think about what move he or she will make next, even though we have no way of knowing. We need to think more and to be kept guessing. We need to have discussion. This is what the best art does.
5) Short films must not be made with an audience in mind. Filmmakers must not believe that an audience needs a cunning twist or a happy ending.
The only audience is the filmmaker who's making the film, and if a few other people like it too, then great! But don't make the film with an audience in mind. They are not important to your vision. You do not exist to make their life happier or richer.
6) Short films must not be restricted by genre.
Is it a comedy drama, a spoof documentary, an animated experimental gallery piece? Who cares? It's a film…
7) Short films must not open with an alarm clock going off and the main protagonist waking up in a brightly lit room.
This is where it gets personal. Do any of us sleep in full bright sunlight? Do our lives only ever begin when we wake up in bed in the morning?
8) Short films must not be accompanied by a slow and poignant solo piano soundtrack.
Plinky-plonky piano music to create a mood? No! Please no one else go there. Unless of course, that piano is integral to your vision rather than it being cheap because your mate has a Woolworths stand-up electric. But please, for the sanity of short film programmers, find another option for your soundtrack.
To sum up: we want original voices, auteur visions, works of art. Of course, this will give us a proliferation of overblown, pompous and arrogant filmmakers who barge their way around Cannes and Sundance. But the true ones will shine through – I promise! It's happened in the past. Since I've been programming shorts, in the UK I've seen the career paths and amazing work of Andrea Arnold, Andrew Kötting, Alison Murray, Shane Meadows, Lynne Ramsay. These are the filmmakers who've transcended the norm, who've bucked the trends outlined above; I could even argue that some of their shorts are far superior to their features. But now it's time to bring on the next generation.
Arise makers of short films! With this eight-point plan as a guide, go and create. Kill off the fakes and scare off the phonies who are fast taking over the world of short film.
The next Halloween Short Film Festival runs Jan 6 to 15 2007.
User comments on this story
-
- Shane Vahey said...
- Very interesting. I get a real sense of anger and frustration from Philip's complaints and advice. I understand where he's coming from and beg him to become a producer. Would he consider producing one of my scripts? I've made shorts before and always gone against the grain. Sadly, some people just love to conform, but it's terribly frustrating for many filmmakers to be told over and over that we must conform to the current norm, write scripts that are pre-approved before shooting, make sure it fits a standard genre, remember people want happy endings, with or without a twist. Look at the fims that are getting funded, we're told. Don't go over ten minutes. Don't go over four minutes. Three. Two. One. There is now an ocean of schemes, courses and other opportunities sucking people with no real training into making short films. We have an awfully big gap between this at the very bottom and making features. How about reviving the medium-length film? How about funding medium films and screening them at festivals? It's not surprising some makers of one or two great little shorts fall down when suddenly propelled into making a mighty feature. Many would fare better if they were allowed to go one step at a time. We need serious funding to do this, however, and proper exposure for longer films. Posted on Nov 03 2006 13:56
- Report as inappropriate
-
- Kramer said...
- I agree. With both JayV and Philip Tilson. I too am fed up with short films that end with a twist, etc. I saw the Nuggets programme too and many of them did break Mr Tilson's own manifesto rules: twists, genre pics, calling cards. And let's not forget also that one of the most favoured shorts in the festival - MASH UP - was a 'twister' in the same way as Jacob's Ladder or The Sixth Sense. These exceptions prove that publishing 'rules' will only serve to embarrass programmers and infuriate film-makers. Posted on Nov 03 2006 01:43
- Report as inappropriate
-
- JayV said...
- Phillip, who are you? More importantly, who do you think you are? You selected some films for this year's festival - in the 'NUGGETS' programme - which should never have been presented to a paying audience. And most didn't meet your pompous 'eight-point plan'. Get a grip. Or go make a film yourself. Posted on Nov 03 2006 00:40
- Report as inappropriate
Most popular on this site
Top Stories
Review: Penélope Cruz more raunchy than ever in 'Nine'
Dave Calhoun reports on Rob Marshall's Oscar-touted musical with Daniel Day-Lewis playing a troubled director
Time Out's 101 Films of the Decade
Ten years, thousands of movies and millions of dollars in international box office, and it all boils down to this
Jim Jarmusch on 'The Limits of Control'
Jim Jarmusch has followed ‘Broken Flowers’ with an esoteric crime mystery. Dave Calhoun speaks to him from his New York office
Richard Linklater on 'Me and Orson Welles'
Dave Calhoun meets the 49-year-old, Houston-born filmmaker Richard Linklater to discuss his new comedy
Our verdict on Peter Jackson's The Lovely Bones
Peter Jackson ends a triumphant decade with a sentimental misfire with this lush Alice Sebold adaptation
On the set of Ken Loach's 'Route Irish'
Dave Calhoun meets Ken Loach on the set of his forthcoming Iraq war movie
Is 'Paranormal Activity' the new 'Blair Witch'?
How does a film go from DIY experiment to box-office smash? 'Paranormal Activity' director Oren Peli explains
A gateway to all things 'New Moon'
In anticipation of 'The Twilight Saga: New Moon', Time Out is offering the chance to pick up a limited edition pack with three exclusive magazines and a free poster.
The films that deserve a TV spin-off
With Roland Emmerich suggesting he'd like to make a '2012' TV spin-off, we propose some more movie-to-TV serialisations
Time Out's 50 greatest animated films with commentary by Terry Gilliam
In celebration of the release of Pixar's 'Up' and Wes Anderson's 'Fantastic Mr Fox', read our rundown of fifty classic feature length animations













What do you think?
Post your comment now