Film

What's on at the cinema plus reviews of the latest movie and DVD releases

Search cinema listings

Browse cinemas A-Z

Search 20,000 reviews

 

  • Print this page
  • Send to a friend

The myth of the 'unfilmable' novel

With 'Perfume' finally making it to the big screen, Will Gore considers other supposedly unfilmmable novels.

Jan 10 2007

With the recent arrival of 'Perfume: The Story of a Murderer' in cinemas, perhaps the myth of the 'unfilmable' novel can finally be laid to rest.

Author Patrick Suskind's tale of a killer with an extraordinary sense of smell features pages and pages of detailed sensory descriptions that appear impossible to translate to film, and Suskind initially believed his novel would never make it to the big screen.

However, he eventually entrusted the rights to his friend and film producer Bernd Eichinger, and the result is a menacing, morally ambiguous effort that may lack the depth and scope of the novel, but nevertheless stands up as a decent piece of work in its own right.

'Perfume' was not the first book to be labelled 'unfilmable', but this is clearly a misnomer. In every case I can think of filmmakers have found ways of bringing all kinds of 'difficult' books to our screens, and 'difficult' can mean a range of things, from excessive violence and drug taking to sexually explicit content and problematic story structures.

Yet it seems none of these problems are impossible to overcome, although the resulting films often meet with differing levels of success.

David Cronenberg adapted JG Ballard's controversial novel 'Crash' and the result was a sexually charged, if somewhat dull film. Mary Harron fared much better with her adaptation of Bret Easton Ellis's infamous 'American Psycho'. Rather than taking Cronenberg's po-faced literal approach to adaptation, she eschewed much of the book's carnage, and created a dark, hilarious satire of eighties yuppie-dom.

Another reason why few, if any, books remain 'unfilmable' is that the adaptation can become a holy grail for filmmakers, who are in the main a determined bunch.

Francis Ford Coppola owns the rights to Jack Kerouac's seminal beat generation novel 'On the Road', and has kept this project alive for decades, having acquired the rights to the book in 1968.

The production has endured many false starts, perhaps due to the iconic status of the novel or the story's unwieldy structure. But finally it appears Coppola's dream will be realised as shooting could begin on the picture later this year with Walter Salles, of 'The Motorcycle Diaries' fame, slated to direct.

As far as adaptations are concerned, the best results seem to come when adaptors are faced with tricky books that force them to think creatively, so we have high hopes for the forthcoming adaptations of 'The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time', 'Atlas Shrugged' and 'The Time Traveller's Wife'. Indeed, when a book is too 'filmable' things can go horribly wrong, as with Brian de Palma's disastrous version of Tom Wolfe's bestseller, 'The Bonfire of the Vanities'. The satirical tome seemed to be crying out for translation to celluloid, but ended up an overblown, expensive mess.

Maybe you can think of a book that is truly 'unfilmable', but I bet there's a director out there ready and waiting to prove you wrong.

  • Print this page
  • Send to a friend

User comments on this story

  • Jack said...
    Ulysses? How could you tell if it were done poorly? Posted on Jan 12 2007 01:20
    Report as inappropriate
  • Andy said...
    Ulysses by Joyce. I'd love to see it filmed, but would be horrified if it were done poorly. Posted on Jan 11 2007 17:46
    Report as inappropriate
  • jacqueline said...
    Donna Tart's Secret history and Alice Sebold's Lovely bones. I thought the movie of Everything is illuminated was a total waste of time. But maybe for people who never read the book and never heard of it, it was not so bad. Posted on Jan 11 2007 14:52
    Report as inappropriate
  • Alex said...
    Great piece. I think one of the best adaptations i have ever seen was 'Beloved' directed by Jonathan Demme starring Oprah Winfrey and Danny Glover. Based on the novel with the same title by Toni Morrison, both the book and the film are a haunting evocation of people living with horrors of slavery in America. Credit to Winfrey who fought to get it made. Posted on Jan 11 2007 14:27
    Report as inappropriate
  • Jack said...
    Atlas Shrugged is a classic that I have gladly read three times. Like any great work of art, I get more out of it each time I read it. I certainly hope that the movie version is as faithful to the book as the movie of her other novel, "The Fountainhead," done in the 1940's. Posted on Jan 11 2007 12:49
    Report as inappropriate
  • EqualOpportunity said...
    Michael Winterbottom made an excellent adaptation of the "unfilmable" Life and Opinions of Tristram Shndy last year with A Cock and Bull Story. As for Atlas Shrugged it is a hulking monstrosity of a novel; there's no reason to suspect the film will be any different. Posted on Jan 11 2007 11:56
    Report as inappropriate
6 user comments

What do you think?
Post your comment now

*mandatory fields





Top Stories

Cannes 2008 diary: 'Blindness'

Cannes 2008 diary: 'Blindness'

Dave Calhoun sees the good and the bad in Fernando Meirelles' 'Blindness', the opening film at the 2008 Cannes Film Festival

The Wild Geese: 30 Years On

The Wild Geese: 30 Years On

Time Out looks back at Andrew V. McLaglen's 1978 Film 'The Wild Geese', 30 years after its original release

Ashton Kutcher: a life in film

Ashton Kutcher: a life in film

Ashton Kutcher has made it big without ever being in a decent film. Time Out looks back over his strange career

Speed Racer: special feature

Speed Racer: special feature

Welcome to our special feature on the Wachowski brothers' 'Speed Racer', with exclusive features, shots from the movie and our early review of the film