Film
What's on at the cinema plus reviews of the latest movie and DVD releases
'Loose Change 9/11' heading for UK cinemas
Revolver have acquired the rights to the hugely successful online film about the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
May 24 2007
Online film phenomenon 'Loose Change 9/11' has been picked up for theatrical release in the UK.
The controversial documentary, which centres on the September 11 terrorist attacks and the failure of both the US government and the media to answer the questions surrounding the tragedy, is one of the most downloaded films in internet history.
It was also the subject of BBC documentary '9/11: The Conspiracy Files' and was screened in London as part of Time Out's 'My Favourite Film' season last year.
Revolver has picked up the rights to 'Loose Change (Final Cut)' and will release the film on the anniversary of 9/11.
User comments on this story
-
- scaulen said...
- OK so we are supposed to only believe the eye witnesses that the groups that believe in a conspiracy agree with?? So all those military personnel working at the Pentagon who filed reports on the parts they found strewn through out that side of the building are not to believed but someones cousins, uncles, brother who had a friend that lived in NY is concrete testimony and is given absolute moral authority? Posted on Jun 12 2007 20:08
- Report as inappropriate
-
- scaulen said...
- lets see they beat security at 4 airports. Lets look at that. They walked on with box cutters that were allowed up until 9/11 happened. Wow real tough to beat security that was allowing people on planes with weapons. Posted on Jun 12 2007 19:49
- Report as inappropriate
-
- JoeM said...
- We are the rich businessmen you speak of. We will crush your children under our boot heels. Posted on Jun 12 2007 19:44
- Report as inappropriate
-
- JoeM said...
-
If it was a missle that hit the pentagon then where is the plane and all of the passengers?
Area 51? Posted on Jun 12 2007 19:10 - Report as inappropriate
-
- scaulen said...
- Hey Sentinel great hive mind thinking there, we can see who the sheep are. Posted on Jun 12 2007 19:07
- Report as inappropriate
-
- scaulen said...
-
Iraq was an oil grab huh? Then why didn't we just go in and grab the fields and ports and say screw the rest?
You guys have all this info, track back the money like you said and bring them to court. I will repeat until you have evidence that can stand up in court and can get a conviction from then you have squat. Most of this conspiracy BS is for one thing only, make money. Yup making money off the deaths of 3,000 americans Posted on Jun 12 2007 18:39 - Report as inappropriate
-
- Sentinel said...
- Yeah, like he said Posted on Jun 12 2007 18:06
- Report as inappropriate
-
- Lawrence said...
-
Ok,
Where's the photo with a tail section and tail number, where's the identifying part number on any of these plane parts that identify them as Boeing 757 parts? Where are the 9 foot diameter titanium and steel engines? I worked around aircraft for 5 years, military and civilian, rim designs are common as is the groove in aircraft tires, they all use relatively the same design. I never said no plane hit the Pentagon, I claim it wasn't a Boeing 757. Are we back to relying only on eyewitness testimony and inconclusive photos again?
None of the evidence regarding the Pentagon matters if you can't provide visual evidence of a Boeing impacting the building or show an identifying part number from a Boeing. That part of the building was under construction, do you really believe the terrorists were intelligent enough to beat security at 4 airports, commandeer 4 aircraft, fly them hundreds of miles, penetrated the defenses of the worlds most fortified building, yet they had no idea which side of the Pentagon to hit even with Rumsfeld's office location being public knowledge? And in fact flew 270 degrees around the Pentagon to hit an almost empty side of the building. Not to mention happening more than an hour into the attack, yet not a single aircraft scrambled from Andrews Airforce Base 10 miles down the road. And then Bush remains an extra 20 minutes on a chair for a goat story after being told "America's under attack" with no proof of how many planes were missing at the time, or where they were headed, and his visit to the elementary school was also public knowledge announced the day before (building an alibi?). Yet the Secret Service ignored their own protocol and didn't wisk the president away to safety.
Atta video, Boeing video at the Pentagon, 9/11: Press for Truth, and www.patriotsquestion911.com If you can't refute these, you must concede the possibility that it is all to real. If you claim to refute them, then you are hopelessly, blindly ignorant, or you are simply one of them and a traitor to the rest of your citizens, someday you'll wonder if the money was worth it. You want a list of who's involved? Major Corporations including those who own weapons, energy, and technology manufacturing, as well as those who control Mainstream Media which amounts to mostly just 5 corporations globally. If you trace the finances of most of those in charge in Washington, it leads back to corporate board rooms. Are you all that stupid that you don't recognize Iraq as an oil grab where we have the top 3 in Washington are oilmen? (including Condoleeza Rice who was board of directors of Chevron for 10 years before taking Bush's National Security Advisor job). The Popular Mechanic's article is a joke, anyone with a working knowledge of structural design or physics can refute it. Why would our government do this? Because its a shadow of the government its supposed to be, a truly democratically run government wouldn't do this, but a corrupt one controlled and infiltrated by rich business men certainly would and a "Pearl Harbor" like attack was necessary to allow them to declare pre-emptive war at will by passing the Patriot Act and the myriad of others that have taken the Constitution one step away from near death, and you nitwits are content with sitting back and letting it happen and for who? Rich business men who have everything to gain from perpetual war and squashing dissent. Wake up! like I tried to say before, all you are doing is selling your own children into future slavery. Posted on Jun 06 2007 17:50 - Report as inappropriate
-
- scaulen said...
-
OK don't believe the government, I have no problem with that, every thing is a conspiracy. How about popular mechanics? Or are they involved in the conspiracy? Give me a list of who is involved in the conspiracy, and why. Also tell me why the US government would do this to itself. Was it done so we could attack Afghanistan? For what reason, their secret for growing rocks?
To keep Bush in office? He had just been elected so there was no way he was leaving, and would he do this so early in his term to make sure he got re-elected?
To destroy information to keep someone from being prosecuted? There are a lot of easier ways to accomplish this then crash planes into buildings, and fields. Posted on Jun 06 2007 16:50 - Report as inappropriate
-
- scaulen said...
-
Yeah you are right, I guess finding "burnt bodies still buckled into their seats, landing gear, the tail section with the planes tail numbers on it, and the ability to identify 184 of the 189 people who died in the Pentagon attack (125 from the Pentagon and 64 onboard American Airlines flight 77). All but one of the passengers onboard American Airlines flight 77 was positively identified as a match with DNA samples provided by the families of the crash victims." isn't enough proof for some people, they just have to see it with their own two eyes.
www rense com /general32 /phot.htm
Read the reports of finding debris spread through out the inside of the building. The building acted like a huge cheese grater, stripping off pieces after each wall it punched through. Posted on Jun 06 2007 16:37 - Report as inappropriate
-
- scaulen said...
-
Yeah you are right, I guess finding "burnt bodies still buckled into their seats, landing gear, the tail section with the planes tail numbers on it, and the ability to identify 184 of the 189 people who died in the Pentagon attack (125 from the Pentagon and 64 onboard American Airlines flight 77). All but one of the passengers onboard American Airlines flight 77 was positively identified as a match with DNA samples provided by the families of the crash victims." isn't enough proof for some people, they just have to see it with their own two eyes.
www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm
Read the reports of finding debris spread through out the inside of the building. The building acted like a huge cheese grater, stripping off pieces after each wall it punched through. Posted on Jun 06 2007 16:33 - Report as inappropriate
-
- JoeM said...
-
Lawrence,
You continue to ignore the elephant in the room.
So where are the passengers?
As far as Mark Bingham's call; this proves conspiracy?
The flight attendant who saw water; they were not supposed to be over water. That's when she knew something terribly horrible was about to happen. Again, this proves conspiracy? You've got to do better than that. Posted on Jun 06 2007 16:30 - Report as inappropriate
-
- Lawrence said...
- Yeah, so if you believe what eyewitnesses say, then why not beleive the dozens of eyewitness and news reports that claim bombs and exlosions going off in the buildings? If a Boeing hit the Pentagon, then why not release the dozens of videos that should show the plane impacting the building? Yet none exists. Aircraft parts having identifiable numbers, yet no numbers have been offered to prove from a Boeing. And a handful of parts that can't be identified correctly are not proof especially since a 60 ton aircraft should leave a minimum of 30 -50 tons of scatterd debri. Yet we're supposed to believe that for the first time in history, an entire plane was vaporized on 4 occassions. Cell phone calls were impossible to make at aver 5000 feet in a moving aircraft, so its idiotic to beleive that they were made at altitudes between 10-30,000 ft. I tested this myself on 2 occasions. One "alleged" call was recorded as "Hello Mom, This is Mark Bingham", Who on this planet would have to say their last name to their own mother? And then we're supposed to believe that a 12 year veteran stewardess from Logan states "I'm not sure where we are, I see buildings and water...", and we're supposed to believe that this veteran from Logan didn't recognize Manhattan? Again, where's the video of Atta that you claim to have seen, and where's the video of a Boeing hitting the Pentagon? You keep trying to throw out addititional evidence, but you still have failed to bakc up anything you've claimed. Larry Posted on Jun 06 2007 16:20
- Report as inappropriate
-
- scaulen said...
-
For larry, bin laden left handed.
www.aeronautics.ru/img/img005/bin_laden_002.jpg Posted on Jun 06 2007 16:02 - Report as inappropriate
-
- scaulen said...
-
for Larry Bin Laden left handed.
www. aeronautics.ru/img/img005/bin_laden_002.jpg
images.forbes.com/images/2001/09/14/osasma_bin_laden3_250x322.jpg
www. g2bulletin.com/images/Osama-Hamid.jpg
graphics.boston.com/news/packages/underattack/images/binladen_16.jpg
www. chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2005-09/21/xin_2106021609030831897710.jpg Posted on Jun 06 2007 16:01 - Report as inappropriate
Most popular on this site
Top Stories
Time Out's 101 Films of the Decade
Ten years, thousands of movies and millions of dollars in international box office, and it all boils down to this
Martin Provost discusses 'Séraphine'
Trevor Johnston talks to the director of 'Séraphine' about bringing a little known French painter back to life
Our verdict on Peter Jackson's The Lovely Bones
Peter Jackson ends a triumphant decade with a sentimental misfire with this lush Alice Sebold adaptation
On the set of Ken Loach's 'Route Irish'
Dave Calhoun meets Ken Loach on the set of his forthcoming Iraq war movie
Stephen Poliakoff discusses 'Glorious 39'
Stephen Poliakoff’s ‘Glorious 39’ is his first film for cinema since ‘Food of Love’ in 1997. Dave Calhoun met him
Is 'Paranormal Activity' the new 'Blair Witch'?
How does a film go from DIY experiment to box-office smash? 'Paranormal Activity' director Oren Peli explains
Steven Soderbergh on 'The Informant!' and 'The Girlfriend Experience'
We talk to Steven Soderbergh about his two forthcoming films: one featuring a porn star, the other a chubby Matt Damon
A gateway to all things 'New Moon'
In anticipation of 'The Twilight Saga: New Moon', Time Out is offering the chance to pick up a limited edition pack with three exclusive magazines and a free poster.
The films that deserve a TV spin-off
With Roland Emmerich suggesting he'd like to make a '2012' TV spin-off, we propose some more movie-to-TV serialisations
Time Out's 50 greatest animated films with commentary by Terry Gilliam
In celebration of the release of Pixar's 'Up' and Wes Anderson's 'Fantastic Mr Fox', read our rundown of fifty classic feature length animations














What do you think?
Post your comment now