Eddie Murphy's Crimes Against Cinema
We all remember the comic highs of 'Beverly Hills Cop' and 'Bowfinger', but Eddie Murphy has been in a fair few stinkers as well. To celebrate the release of his latest megabudget 'will-this-do?' shrugfest 'Meet Dave', Time Out to presents a handy rundown of his ten darkest cinematic hours...
Best Defence (1984)When ‘84’s cross-processed Dudley Moore vehicle (sic), ‘Best Defence’ was originally screened to test audiences as a screwball war satire à la ‘Dr Strangelove’ meets ‘Micki + Maude’, the general reaction was that 90 minutes of Moore clad in a brown cord jacket and kipper tie, half-heartedly (and no doubt drunkenly) hareing around an LA back-lot with KGB agents on his tail would not fly with the Haight-Ashbury massive. Lucky for all concerned, an on-set intern had the idea of splicing in some stock footage of Eddie Murphy driving around the Mojave Desert in a commandeered tank, shouting ‘I love Iraq!’ to a bunch of extras with boot-polished faces and tea towels on their heads. Murphy would later air his thoughts on ‘Best Defense’ live on national television which, due to their extreme content, cannot be relayed on this site.
Laughs to budget ratio: 70%
The Golden Child (1986)
‘The Golden Child’ was a movie both behind and ahead of its time. In its wholesale appropriation of Eastern cultural symbols into the Hollywood blockbuster it lagged behind both ‘The Karate Kid’ (1984) and ‘Big Trouble in Little China’ (1985). But as an overblown, over-budget, wildly unfunny vehicle for a mugging and sorely miscast Eddie, the film eerily anticipates later tragedies like ‘Pluto Nash’ and ‘Meet Dave’. Here, Eddie travels from LA to Tibet in search of the titular chosen moppet, pursued by a skeletal demon played creepily by Charles Dance until all his skin falls off and he turns into something Ray Harryhausen shat out one wet Sunday afternoon.
Laughs to budget ratio: 40%
Eddie Murphy Raw (1987)
Eddie’s first stand-up video ‘Delirious’ (1983) was a patchy but memorably foul-mouthed Richard Pryor tribute, beloved of rebellious schoolchildren everywhere. But it’s a squeaky-clean cuddlefest compared to the follow-up. 'Raw' stunned audiences with a tirade of anti-feminist invective, foul-mouthed and fearsomely belligerent. Fresh from a nasty divorce, he uses his 90-minute routine as nothing less than comic abuse, a sort of ‘Nil by Mouth’, by mouth. There are diversions: Eddie takes the opportunity to berate Bill Cosby, hurl a few racial insults and discuss his own faeces. But it’s the ‘bitches’ who bear the brunt. Worst of all, its not even that funny.
Laughs to budget ratio: Unapplicable
Harlem Nights (1989)
Murphy wrote, directed and starred in this decidedly rum period comedy opposite Richard Pryor (still ‘hot’ from ‘Hear No Evil, See No Evil’) which, if nothing else, showed that the silver-tongued homme des gags had the capacity to make terrible films even having starred in some sizeable hits. When a harmless back-room dice game descends into fevered gunplay, a bond is wrought between handlebar-moustached ringleader Sugar Ray (Pryor) and smart-mouthed errand boy Quick (Murphy). Unluckily for the Paramount accounts dept (the film cost a cool $30 million to make), the pair decide to develop a nightclub/brothel empire in Harlem in which they strut around in cream suits, brush scantily clad women into the gutter and swear like it's going out of fashion.
Laughs to budget ration: 10%
Vampire in Brooklyn (1995)
About as tonally awkward as a society ball held in a Russian slum, Wes Craven’s sub-‘Blacula’ comic horror blockbuster managed to be neither funny nor horrific. With Milli Vanilli locks and a light Jamaican patois, Murphy feels lost at sea as nouveau riche vacationing vampire Maximillian, who heads to New York in order to keep his dwindling family line from ending. One minute Eddie’s spouting terrible joke-book horror gags about how he ‘likes to suck’ and has ‘just eaten’ etc, then we’re treated to revolting close-up shots of him tearing some guy’s heart out and stamping on it like a cigarette butt. The final shot sets up a sequel, but thankfully, it appears no one of import actually got that far.
Laughs to budget ratio: How low can you go?
Holy Man (1998)
Murphy breaks out the fish, barrel and shotgun to have a crack at ‘consumerism’, represented by a gaudy home-shopping channel buckling under the weight of Jeff Goldblum’s Special Acting Style. Eddie plays G, a smiling guru whose accidental intrusion into the lives of TV execs Goldblum and Kelly Preston lands the channel with his serene screen presence, hawking redemptive aphorisms along with the tat. Following the clear economic patterns laid out in Milton Friedman’s 'Screw You, Look At My Yacht', the presence of a white-robed simpleton spouting Christmas-cracker philosophy causes sales to rocket and Goldblum and Preston to become better, less stressed yuppies. Oh, and richer too. It’s another spiritual enema from the director of ‘Mr Holland’s Opus’, Stephen Herek, whose next move was into real comedy with Mark Wahlberg in ‘Rock Star’.
Laughs to budget ratio: None. But also an infinite number.
Nutty Professor II: The Klumps (2000)
Having felt that he didn’t say enough on the subject of a morbidly obese professor who was able to turn himself into a nubile, sexually voracious stud with the aid of a slimming potion, Murphy decided to re-whir the crankshaft of the already rickety Jerry Lewis vehicle for this sequel in which the star again satisfies his narcissistic urge to play multiple characters. With Janet Jackson on board and a story about vulgar extended family members and gaseous emissions, this laugh-neutral flab farce is probably not the worst movie to emerge from Eddie’s canon, but it’s arguably the one that spawned the ‘fat is funny’ mantra that seems to taint most mainstream Hollywood comedy these days.
Laughs to budget ratio: With a budget of £84 million, that’s £21m per laugh.
The Adventures of Pluto Nash (2002)
Like a flatulent astronaut, the studio waited ages to sneak this one out only to leave everyone feeling browned off. Murphy dusts down his Ladies Man persona as Nash, an ex-con busily turning his run-down nightclub on the moon into a lunar Stringfellows. Naturally, the sudden success of this venture attracts the attention of some kind of moon mob, meaning Murphy has less time to spend purring at Rosario Dawson or horsing around with his robot chum Dennis Quaid and must engage in a series of largely pointless chases in space cars amid a tuppenny-ha’penny approximation of the set of 'Space Precinct'. There is no truth to the rumour that the DVD release has hard-of-hearing subtitles in which every line spoken is transcribed as 'Where’s my paycheck?'
Laughs to budget ratio: 1 to 100 million (US dollars)
The Marketing of Shrek (2001-infinity)
Crass, brash and seemingly neverending, the overbearing cynicism of the ‘Shrek’ movies themselves is only exceeded by the monstrous marketing behemoth that has sprung up around them. A sneering, adolescent lampoon of genuinely magical Disney classics in whose shadow this insignificant piffle isn’t fit to linger, the Shrek series has one consistent saving grace, and ironically it’s Eddie Murphy: his Donkey is the only likeable character in the entire affair, and that’s not just down to the writing. But sadly, Eddie’s just as willing to pander to the whims of the marketing Satan as everyone else involved, which leaves us facing pitiful online clips and cheap, pop-culture referencing DVD extras like ‘Far, Far Away Idol’ and the ‘Shrek the Halls’ TV extravaganza, the most heinous piece of movie-themed festive in-cashing since the 'Star Wars Holiday Special'.
Laughs to budget ratio: Hard to judge
Norbit (2007)
The Zimbabwe edition of Africa News was curiously out of step with world opinion when it described Murphy’s performance in 'Norbit' as 'the most remarkable cinematic tour de force we have ever seen'. For the rest of mankind, the stupid, venal, grossly huge Rasputia (Murphy) tussling for the love of Norbit (Murphy) against Thandie Newton (Newton) played rather too much like a eugenics propaganda movie liberally stuffed with fart jokes. With no redeeming features beyond the ability to repeatedly sexually assault her naive husband, there’s no hope for Rasputia against Newton’s superior woman – slim, beautiful and, crucially, not a man in a latex fatsuit. Her untermensch, overweight misadventures are cut with enough bile to drown any laughs but the film strives not to be pigeon-holed as simply misogynist: its harpoon-obsessed generic comic oriental, Mr Wong (Murphy), is a turn in racial stereotyping to rival the masterly Bao Chai’s Screaming Gook No 2 in Cimino’s ‘The Deer Hunter’.
Laughs to budget ratio: 18%
Author: Paul Fairclough, David Jenkins and Tom Huddleston.
User comments on this story
-
- Ben said...
-
''make you look ignorant. Eddie murphies humour clearly attracts the ...'' - Nadia, if your claiming the higher ground, PLEASE SPELL CORRECTLY!! I'm actually a film grad of both UCLA and NFTS, I know a thing or two about film. I attend the Berlin Film Festival. I have a real problem with people 'who have a problem' with artists such as Eddie Murphy. Yes he's crass, yes he aims often at the the lowest common denominator, but that is not at all that Murphy does. A blue collar upbringing in New York, his father stabbed to death when Eddie was aged eight, he is now one of the highest grossing film stars in history. You don't achieve that without talent. You don't like him, fine, but to have Paul Fairclough, David Jenkins and Tom Huddleston spout this poor piece of journo dog turd about the man is plain wrong. Back up your arguments with something a little more substantial than what is presented here...The public don't buy it. Why have so few people posted praise for this article...or even a comment that it was 'funny'?
Had the list omitted the marketing of Shrek, Raw and the Klumps, which made 42.5 Million Dollars in the US IN ITS OPENING WEEKEND.
SO Nadia, what did you expect the response from this article for a man that has pulled in over 3 Billion Dollars??? Posted on Jul 31 2008 08:50 - Report as inappropriate
-
- nadia said...
- Stalinist russia? A feeble attempt to make yourself seem more intelligent- spouting historical references which bare no relation to the topic just make you look ignorant. Eddie murphies humour clearly attracts the lowest common denominator, being you in this case so i am happy for you to put your head where ever you like- there isn't anything in it anyway. Posted on Jul 31 2008 08:23
- Report as inappropriate
-
- Ben said...
-
Nadia-
Your own post is full of typos!!...''this list was meant compile his WORST films....''
Also, most posters here disagree with this list...Shrek?? Raw?? It wasn't funny ( Eddie is, this article wasn't) and how dare you tell me or anyone else what taste in films we should have?? Is this Stalinist Russia, no? You keep watching the latest 'hot' indie film from the Berlin Film Festival in your jumper and keep thinking your oh so better cultured than the rest of us....Meanwhile we'll keep watching anything we like, our heads firmly out of our asses, unlike some... Posted on Jul 31 2008 08:10 - Report as inappropriate
-
- nadia said...
- I think everyone here is missing the point; this list was meant compile his WORST films, therefore it is reasonable to expect harsh criticism of them and more importantly, it is meant to humorous. The fact that it riled up such intense and melodramatic emotions in people eager to rush to "poor eddies defence" just shows that you have no idea how editorial journalism works, which might relate to why you have such poor taste in films, appalling grammar and still insist on being the victim of a discriminatory society whilst you in turn belittle people with “art house” preferences because they differ from yours. Posted on Jul 31 2008 07:56
- Report as inappropriate
-
- Joe said...
- Liam- Why is it hard to believe?? The millions and millions the man has made and his legend status, believe there are more of us than art -w**nk lovers like you...the numbers don't lie Posted on Jul 29 2008 14:14
- Report as inappropriate
-
- liam said...
- bloody hell. eddie murphy defenders....its hard to believe... Posted on Jul 29 2008 06:06
- Report as inappropriate
-
- Martin said...
- Get a life Kimberly, not everyone wants to live in the bland Art House hell that you must live in! Loser! Posted on Jul 26 2008 16:27
- Report as inappropriate
-
- Kimberly said...
- I'm so glad TimeOut compiled this list. Not only did I not waste precious time watching these crap,degrading to black people, black women, humanity films, I didn't have to come up with the list (though I knew there'd be plenty). Eddie' defenders clearly populate his audience...and short buses. Posted on Jul 26 2008 10:39
- Report as inappropriate
-
- miss m said...
- how dare you Timeout - just becuase Eddie is has RAW talent and is not as NUTTY as you guys. I come to his BEST DEFENCE on this article. Only a fool woud not realise that he is not HOLY MAN so will not be squeaky clean in his act.Therefore i ask you tIme out to shove your artcile where the sun don't shine in some dark HARLEM NIGHT place where its so dark that there's VAMPIRES IN BROOKLYN. Leave EDDIE the **** alone man. Who made you judge of what is good and what is not good films. Posted on Jul 25 2008 14:40
- Report as inappropriate
-
- yoda said...
- ya'll just jealous of Eddie - Raw was scaringly a true depiction of life in the 80s!! Posted on Jul 25 2008 14:28
- Report as inappropriate
-
- Roger said...
- Paul Fairclough, David Jenkins and Tom Huddleston you are clueless, Raw is one of the funniest stan-ups of all time hands down, Harlem Nighta (which could have been better) was still really funny and Shrek is a great movie everyone in my family laughed at it Posted on Jul 22 2008 09:25
- Report as inappropriate
-
- Eddie Murphy said...
- What a pointless article, how Raw can be included is beyond me. Paul Fairclough, David Jenkins and Tom Huddleston you are indeed all clowns. Posted on Jul 18 2008 10:47
- Report as inappropriate
-
- Julio said...
- I can't understand that Dudley Moore is still getting flak from your writer for being constantly drunk, when in fact it has now been well documented that his drunk-like symptoms were as a result of Supranuclear Palsy. Research doesn't mean watching 'Arthur' and thinking it is reality. Posted on Jul 18 2008 08:46
- Report as inappropriate
-
- usman khawaja said...
-
this is a very unfair and prejudiced article -time out should have more sense than going around preaching predictable politically correct crap that does not reflect reality in anyway .
eddie murphy has his place in the world of art and this is like insulting millions of his fans as morons and what right does timeout or anyone have to generalise an artist and his work as crimes against humanity like he was george bush
total crap -take care Posted on Jul 16 2008 10:45 - Report as inappropriate
-
- dr mum said...
- Eddie is funny whatever he does. I laugh just looking at him. Posted on Jul 16 2008 07:33
- Report as inappropriate
Most popular on this site
Features
To the letter
Forty years later, Costa-Gavras's Z still brims with fury.
Mind over matter
David Cronenberg reflects on a most bizarre body: his own corpus of work.
Fool's gold
Can an Oscar win lead to a cursed career? Here are five stories of postaward professional meltdowns.
We are the championed
Terrorists and teens abound in this year's "Film Comment Selects."
A history of violence
Matteo Garrone's kaleidoscopic Gomorrah wallops you with Italy's crime crisis.
True romantic
James Gray exchanges urban amorality for amour in Two Lovers.
Playing in the dark
MoMA salutes pianist Stuart Oderman's 50 years as the one-man sound of silents.
Junk bonds
Cast and crew recall the making of the classic NYC drug drama The Panic in Needle Park.



What do you think?
Post your comment now