Film

Movie theaters, reviews and showtimes in New York, plus articles, trailers and more

 

Classic Film Club: 'The Man With The Golden Arm'

Each week Tom Huddleston watches a classic film he's never seen before. The rules are simple: each film must be considered a masterpiece and each must be completely new to him. This week: Otto Preminger's 'The Man With the Golden Arm' (1955)

Though it was the first mainstream Hollywood movie to tackle the problem of opiate addiction, the word ‘heroin’ is never actually spoken in ‘The Man With the Golden Arm’– maybe the producers were concerned that impressionable audiences might be turned on by the cautionary events onscreen and seek out the demon drug for themselves. The past five decades have seen more frank and disturbing cinematic depictions of smack abuse, it’s cures and consequences, but few have managed to top Preminger’s initial shot in terms of entertainment value, emotional impact and sheer, low-life class.

Frank Sinatra brings his usual insouciance and bravado to the role of Frankie Machine, a recovering hophead who took the cure during a five-year stretch at Lexington. Now he’s clean and back out on the street, ready to try out his new skills as a hot jazz drummer and eager to resist falling back into old patterns and habits, no matter how great the temptation. On the surface, the role fits Sinatra like a glove: Machine is a popular guy around the neighbourhood, a cool-as-ice poker dealer with a hidden heart of gold, a nice line in street patter and an eye for the ladies, particularly Kim Novak’s hostess Molly. But it quickly becomes clear that, despite the name, Frankie is a world away from the usual Sinatra character: that surface cool masks a restless, tortured spirit, burning with guilt for the mistakes he’s made and eager to make a mark in the ‘real’ world. It’s a part Sinatra could only have played at this point in his career– a few years earlier he hadn’t been big enough to carry a dramatic movie single handed, a decade later he was content to settle for uncomplicated roles in the likes of ‘Ocean’s 11’ and ‘Robin and the Seven Hoods’.

The script, adapted from Nelson Algren’s novel by ‘Ace in the Hole’ screenwriter Walter Newman and given an uncredited polish by the great Ben Hecht, takes few risks, plotting Machine’s fairly predictable journey from hopeful ex-con to disaffected junkie and back again. There’s a certain amount of unnecessary melodrama, most of it stemming from Eleanor Parker’s wall-chewing, wheelchair-bound spouse Zosch and Darren McGavin’s louche, moustache-twiddling pusher Louie. None of this makes the movie any less entertaining– indeed, quite the opposite–- but it does make the first hour or so rather hard to take seriously.

Any such doubts are forgotten in the final act, as Machine finds himself strung out and on the run for a crime he didn’t commit. Holing up in Molly’s one-room apartment, he’s left with no option but to go cold turkey, locking the doors and barring the windows and just waiting it out. It’s a harsh, unforgiving sequence, Preminger’s God’s-eye camera lurching and swooping around the claustrophobic apartment as Sinatra sweats, moans and prays for deliverance. There have been more confrontational withdrawal sequences in cinema– Gene Hackman’s tour de force in ‘The French Connection II’ springs to mind– but this one is notable not just for the clammy intensity of the design and photography, but because it’s Frank Sinatra up there, the fingerpoppin’ king of cool, writhing and pining and going out of his head.

Overall, ‘The Man With the Golden Arm’ in no masterpiece. Everyone concerned would do better work elsewhere, with the arguable exception of Elmer Bernstein, whose sinuous, abrasive jazz score is one of the finest in cinema. But the film is hugely enjoyable, and surprisingly affecting, thanks largely to Sinatra and Novak, and to Preminger’s stark, uncompromising direction.

Author: Tom Huddleston



User comments on this story

  • supercol said...
    Gracias , bandido. or perhaps 'The Wizard of Oz' might fit Tom's agenda a bit better,I find it a bit disingenuous the way Tom seems to imply a knowledge of the likes of Ben Hecht but has managed to avoid this film untill coming to write about it. What exactly is this 'never seen before' bit supposed to supply anyway. Are we tacitly admitting then that modern film criticism is devoid of objectivity unless it comes garlanded with ignorance? please advise! Posted on Dec 03 2008 09:57
    Report as inappropriate
  • bandido said...
    You have to admit the man has a point, Tom.
    Perhaps you'll treat us to your first impressions of 'The Third Man' next week...? Posted on Dec 01 2008 13:21
    Report as inappropriate
  • supercol said...
    this is an undisputed classic. I couldn't care less what Tom Fuddlestone thinks of it, the point is how come , junior, you ain't seen it till these people decided to pay you to watch and write about it. Why don't you pay people to write about films who actually have a clue in the first place. time wasters. Posted on Nov 28 2008 20:15
    Report as inappropriate

What do you think?
Post your comment now

*mandatory fields





Features

Making a name for himself

Making a name for himself

Sin Nombre's Cary Joji Fukunaga learned his lessons well.

To the letter

Forty years later, Costa-Gavras's Z still brims with fury.

Mind over matter

David Cronenberg reflects on a most bizarre body: his own corpus of work.

Fool's gold

Can an Oscar win lead to a cursed career? Here are five stories of postaward professional meltdowns.

We are the championed

Terrorists and teens abound in this year's "Film Comment Selects."

A history of violence

Matteo Garrone's kaleidoscopic Gomorrah wallops you with Italy's crime crisis.

True romantic

James Gray exchanges urban amorality for amour in Two Lovers.

Playing in the dark

MoMA salutes pianist Stuart Oderman's 50 years as the one-man sound of silents.

Junk bonds

Cast and crew recall the making of the classic NYC drug drama The Panic in Needle Park.