Film

Movie theaters, reviews and showtimes in New York, plus articles, trailers and more

 

Classic Film Club: 'Fear Eats the Soul'

Each week Tom Huddleston watches a classic film he's never seen before. The rules are simple: each film must be considered a masterpiece and each must be completely new to him. This week: Rainer Werner Fassbinder's 'Fear Eats the Soul' (1973)

While most of his contemporaries in post-new-wave European cinema were going out of their way to be as noisily innovative and confrontational as possible, Rainer Werner Fassbinder was ploughing his own quiet, determined furrow into the postwar German psyche. Inspired by the expansive 1940s, ’50s Hollywood melodramas of Douglas Sirk, which took a similarly satirical, incisive but populist view of modern life, Fassbinder possessed the same rigorous, rebellious intellectualism that drove his peers into the arms of the avant garde, but opted to use it in the service of simple, direct tales of heartfelt realism.

Fear Eats the Soul’ depicts a concrete Germany blighted by economic hardship and racial intolerance, where characters either exist in maudlin isolation or subject themselves to the bitter indignity of the small-minded social pack. The film has long been regarded as one of the era’s most directly ‘humanist’ films, and it’s true, Fassbinder’s sympathy for his central characters is absolute. But it’s perhaps ironic that this empathetic outlook comes, at least initially, at the price of depicting every other character – indeed, the entire world outside the central relationship – as petty, self-regarding and cruel.

The plot would now be regarded as soap opera, but was still fairly dangerous stuff in the early ’70s. Sheltering from the rain, Brigitte Mira’s elderly, widowed hausfrau Emmi finds herself in a bar frequented by Moroccan guest workers, among them El Hedi Ben Salem’s Ali. After a sedate softshoe to an old gypsy tune, the two fall to talking, and eventually into bed. A tentative relationship begins, leading eventually to marriage and some inevitably fraught familial fallout.

But the story itself is relatively unimportant: Fassbinder is far more interested in creating two rich and complex characters, then exploring how societal prejudice impacts upon their lives. Despite the yawning cultural gulf between them, Emmi and Ali are oddly complementary souls: deep but inarticulate thinkers adrift in a world of lonely self-loathing, cut off from their families, whether physically or emotionally.

One of the film’s most challenging themes is revealed through its depiction of mother-child relationships: Emmi loves her children, craving their support and approval. But she is able to survive, and find strength, without them: her relationship with Ali, however rocky, gives her all the comfort she needs. Families are important, Fassbinder seems to be saying, but they’re not as important as personal happiness. When a loved one becomes poisonous, or simply loses interest, it’s perfectly acceptable to cut them loose. If you’re lucky, they’ll come back on their own.

Which is indeed what happens. Fassbinder’s final major theme is revealed only in the last act, as the people in Emmi’s life who abhorred her decision to marry Ali – not just her children, but her neighbours and colleagues – gradually acclimatise to the new state of affairs and, in a series of quiet, beautifully judged scenes, realise how much they need her. Here, Fassbinder is speaking as much to the activist as to the intolerant, illustrating in simple, inescapable terms the gradual nature of social change, and displaying a profound, optimistic faith in humanity’s ability to adapt and improve itself.

Author: Tom Huddleston



User comments on this story

  • tschill said...
    When I first saw this movie I was somewhat puzzled, that Fassbinder gave the story such an optimistic ending. Further viewings made me doubt this easy way out. There is a clear cut in the film, marked by their vacation. They leave in deepest trouble and when they come back everybody has adapted to their relationship? I don't think so. For me the film is divided into a realistic first and a utopian second part. Or if you want to see it from Emmis viewpoint: She starts to dream herself into a better world, because reality is unbearable. The ending of Fassbinders film tells you, that escape from reality is no way to deal with intolerance. Posted on Jan 10 2009 10:32
    Report as inappropriate
  • Srebro said...
    Wow, that was great. I love Fassbinder movies and it's great when I find people remembering his work. Posted on Jan 09 2009 14:11
    Report as inappropriate

What do you think?
Post your comment now

*mandatory fields





Features

Making a name for himself

Making a name for himself

Sin Nombre's Cary Joji Fukunaga learned his lessons well.

To the letter

Forty years later, Costa-Gavras's Z still brims with fury.

Mind over matter

David Cronenberg reflects on a most bizarre body: his own corpus of work.

Fool's gold

Can an Oscar win lead to a cursed career? Here are five stories of postaward professional meltdowns.

We are the championed

Terrorists and teens abound in this year's "Film Comment Selects."

A history of violence

Matteo Garrone's kaleidoscopic Gomorrah wallops you with Italy's crime crisis.

True romantic

James Gray exchanges urban amorality for amour in Two Lovers.

Playing in the dark

MoMA salutes pianist Stuart Oderman's 50 years as the one-man sound of silents.

Junk bonds

Cast and crew recall the making of the classic NYC drug drama The Panic in Needle Park.