Pedro Almodóvar interview
Ben Walters meets the maestro in Madrid to discuss mortality, desire and his brilliant new film, 'Volver'.
Aug 10 2006
The offices of Pedro Almodóvar's production company are inconspicuously located on an unassuming street in north-eastern Madrid. Turn right and walk for three minutes, however, and you're dwarfed by the ornate splendour of Las Ventas, the city's giant bullfighting arena, circus of bloodshed and dreams. It seems an aptly mixed-up spot to find a filmmaker who has always rubbed realism against romanticism, creating a world where the awful, the affecting and the absurd are hugged together in a gloriously human mash. A place where emotion can neither be denied nor run unchecked without consequence, its ironic tension is hinted at in the company's name: El Deseo, SA, or 'Desire, Limited'.
Inside, posters of Almodóvar's films and bright, pastel-coloured plastic furniture decorate a disarmingly quiet open-plan area. A heavy security door leads to an upstairs suite, where the director's personal office has a long, award-punctuated bookcase against one wall and a multi-coloured, vaguely Miró-ish mural-sculpture on the other. Behind his desk, Almodóvar, in a royal blue polo shirt and his trademark shock of now-grizzled hair, is genial and accommodating, knitting and unknitting his sausagey fingers as he considers the balance between serious subjects and playful expressiveness in his work. Speaking in Spanish, he occasionally interrupts the translator in characterfully imperfect English.
'That's perhaps what I'm specialising in,' he says, 'in dealing in that line. It is my greatest concern when I write and when I film – I try to navigate through these tremendously dark, tragic elements in a light-hearted manner, shedding light on all these issues. I do create a universe where these [monstrous] events happen, but it doesn't make the characters monsters. What I always do is treat my characters with utmost humanity and when you treat them like that, humour appears.'
Almodóvar's sixteenth feature, 'Volver' arguably marks the most sophisticated treatment to date of the balance between tragedy and farce that has run through his work, from his raucous 1980 feature debut 'Pepi, Luci, Bom…' to his international breakthrough 'Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown', from the bittersweet identity crises of 'The Flower of My Secret' to the ruinous revenging of 'Bad Education'.
It's also, by the director's own account, his most autobiographical work yet.
Meaning 'to return', or 'coming back', 'Volver' stars Penélope Cruz as Raimunda, a young Madrid wife and mother who, like Almodóvar himself and many of his leading characters, grew up in a small village in La Mancha. She still visits it, with her sister Sole (Lola Dueñas) and 12-year-old daughter (Yohana Cobo), to tend her mother's grave and look in on her aged aunt. When Raimunda's husband suddenly dies and Sole starts receiving visitations from their mother (Carmen Maura, reunited with Almodóvar for the first time since 'Women on the Verge…'), both find that living with death can be a practical as much as an emotional struggle – yet also, ultimately, a catalyst for sisterly solidarity.
Filming was divided between Madrid and location work at the village of Almagro in Ciudad Real, a national heritage site only 20km from Almodóvar's birthplace. 'We were shooting in the place where I was born, where I spent the first eight years of my life, and I did really have a very strong emotional response to it,' he says. 'The streets are just the way they were 50 years ago – that's the place where I heard my first words, where I would watch the neighbours chatting. I had a very strong feeling that it was my life.'
Such intensity stemmed from 'not only recognising the places, but also the absolute presence of my mother in all of them. Nearly all the dialogue is dialogue that I heard my mother speak and my mother is very much present in all the characters. It's a place that's inhabited by the presence of my mother in a way that's very tangible.'
Almodóvar has mixed feelings about the region he couldn't wait to leave as a teenager. 'Volver' started as a story of la España negra, or 'black Spain' – the rural, superstitious and conservative part of the country still often associated, he says, with violence, tragedy, even backwardness: 'It looks like they are living a century before. But I tried to demonstrate that the same Spain, in the same local places with the same local characters, could be called "white Spain", because the neighbours are completely solidar, and all the women help themselves a lot and create a kind of family among them. The movie really talks about women who survive, women who fight fiercely.'
This is hardly a surprise. Rarely since the postwar heyday of the "women’s picture" has a male director offered as sympathetic and celebratory a conception of the female experience as has Almodóvar. Where his male-centred films – 'Matador', 'The Law of Desire', 'Live Flesh', 'Bad Education' – offer abject lessons in the bitter fruits of libido and grudge, the female-centred ones – 'Dark Habits', 'High Heels', 'All About My Mother' etc – spin the beautifully hopeful gold of self-possession and compassion from the most egregious abuses. It's not a clear-cut line, but Almodóvar concurs that 'the movies I make about men are darker than the movies I make with women, which are more luminous and more optimistic. I feel that women live in a more light-hearted world. They have fewer prejudices. They're better at surviving but they're also better at living.'
This is further reflected in the extraordinary degree to which such movies rely on powerful performances rather than visual action. In 'Volver', for instance, the two major crises that propel the plot – one in the past, one in the present – are not seen but reported in extended accounts that bind us, the audience, to the emotional consequences of violence, rather than offering it up as spectacle.
'I have far more trust in the power of actresses and the power of words than in an act of violence,' Almodóvar says. 'I was far more interested in the character's reaction than in just the event. And something I'm discovering unintentionally is that this way of treating action through words has a lot more to do with writing for the theatre. Last week I was in London taking part in the workshop for the stage production of "All About My Mother" and I was amazed to discover that the characters had just as much wealth in English, with actors who still didn't know the parts by heart, on stage as on the screen. And it was a very pleasant experience.'
To followers of Almodóvar’s career, the suitability of his work to the stage is more obvious than him embracing the idea. 'All About My Mother' in particular is explicitly steeped in theatricality, from its backstage setting to its plot modelled on Lorca and Tennessee Williams and its largely female characters' preoccupation with modes of performance (like 'Volver', it's a world of useless or absentee men and breathlessly multi-tasking women).
Having mounted plays of his own at the start of his career, Almodóvar was latterly dissatisfied by Spanish and Italian stage versions of 'Dark Habits' and 'Women on the Verge…' that were produced without his direct involvement, and sceptical when London-based Australian first-time producer Daniel Sparrow approached El Deseo about a play of 'AAMM' in 2002. Swayed by a detailed proposal, however, the director became closely involved in the project, helping select an adaptor – Samuel Adamson, whose 'Southwark Fair' recently played at the National Theatre – and a likely director – Broadway darling David Levaux, whose productions include Williams' 'The Glass Menagerie', 'Sinatra' at the Palladium and Stoppard's 'The Real Thing' – and approving script development.
Last month, Almodóvar came to London for the last three days of a two-week workshop session, accompanied by his producer and brother Agustín and composer Alberto Iglesias, who will adapt his own score for the play. He was, Sparrow reports, enchanted by the process. 'Pedro was quite happy – he just wanted to sit there and learn and watch, see what we were doing. He participated a little bit; he gave some background to the characters. Some of the plot on the surface seems a bit far-fetched, perhaps, but he had and explanation for everything. At first, we were a little scared [to depart from the screenplay]: this is Pedro we're talking about, so we didn't want to leave anything out. But because he's been involved at every stage, he's been able to tell us which bits he thinks are most important.'
Although the play isn't expected to open here before autumn 2007, Broadway producers are already attached and interest is building in Europe, Australia and Japan. The air of excitement clearly extends to Almodóvar himself, who found it offered him a whole new perspective on his own work. 'I enjoyed it, but I was more surprised that I could analyse it,' he says. 'This is something completely new for me, because it was the first time that I could see my work with distance . Everything was different, except the characters. And then I felt very proud because I discovered how I did it, why, and that it worked very well. But that was the first time that I could analyse one of my movies, because when I'm working I'm working, and then when I'm finished working I think about what's going to be next. I never look back – which is not very good, because I think it's good to have memory of everything you've done before. These things give you a kind of support, but I don’t have this support. It's not a pleasant feeling. It's a disgusting feeling – to be born again every day being older and with less time. But I can't help it. I can't stand looking back at the things I've done and the life I've lived.'
This seems surprising given the remarkable consistency of his work: although Almodóvar's technique has grown ever more sophisticated, his essential interests have been more or less constant; to watch his back catalogue is to witness an ongoing conversation of subject, style and characterisation. 'If I look at my career, the chain between each film is a coherent chain,' he agrees, 'but in the point of pure creation, when you have to take those big decisions that make this film be this film and not a different film, I do rely on instinct and intuition. It's certainly not calculated at all.'
Nor is it necessarily pleasurable. 'Sometimes there are things that are very painful to put down but I have to do it because the story is demanding it. In general it's related to desire. Desire is an essential source of vital energy that I really need to live, but it is also a source of tremendous pain. When I was writing parts of 'The Law of Desire' or 'Bad Education', there were things that I knew I had to write, but the upheaval in the story affects you because you have to in some way live through it to be able to write it.'
While the autobiographical aspects of 'Volver' made its creation an intense experience, the confrontation with mortality it represents proved more cathartic than traumatic. It is perhaps the first Almodóvar film in which a consciousness of death at large – rather than an individual mourning – infuses the characters' daily lives. 'This film talks about the tremendously natural way in which people in the area where I was born deal with death and relate to death. And I found that terrifically liberating. I have a very tragic sense of death, but in La Mancha people co-exist very naturally with death, with the dead, and this has been a tremendous lesson.'
Now closer to 60 than 50, the erstwhile enfant terrible has spent the past few years anxiously eyeing the ticking clock. 'I think at some point in your forties, this whole concept of time just lands in front of you – the time that's passed and the time that's left. Talking about time implies talking about death, and death and physical deterioration are things that I'm really concerned about. Death is something that I haven't quite come to terms with – I'm an agnostic, I don't believe there's an alternative after death and I find it frustrating that the cycle is so short.' Accordingly, he is already preparing a new project, provisionally called 'Tarantula', which sounds like something of a departure. 'I'll be making certain formal experiments,' he says. 'I shouldn't tell you the plotline but let's say it's a story of revenge located in the immediate future. You could say it's a German Expressionist film from the silent era mixed in with Buñuel's 'Belle de Jour'.'
Almodóvar shows little sign, then, of complacency or a declining appetite. 'Despite the fact that time passes, you still have needs that are more natural to youth,' he sighs. 'I thought that as one got older those needs would change, but many of them remain the same. I still have very juvenile needs. You have to choose between being healthy and living intense emotions, and this is a choice that I hate to have to face, but that's probably what getting older is all about.' And has he made his choice? He laughs. 'Depends on the day.'
'Volver' is out August 25. See www.allaboutmymother.com for information on the play.
User comments on this story
-
- Sérgio Menezes said...
-
I saw Almodóvar's "Volver" back in May and in spite of bits and pieces that annoyed me throughout the film, I quite enjoyed it as a whole.
What I did not like is the excess of melodrama - and I do not mean just drama, because that is human and exciting - present also in his previous films since "High Heels". People cry too much all the time, to the point of embarrasing ridicule, as was the case in "Talk to her", where a character was a compulsive cry-baby, presented at the time as Almodóvar's "revelation" that men could actually cry. As if nobody knew that before the film.
But in "Volver", the annoying aspect of melodrama is not only associated with tears, but also with a contrived, self-indulgent desire to pay hommage to Visconti's "Belìssima", made obvious in many ways, from the main character's look (Penélope Cruz here doing her Anna Magnani bit, unconvincingly, it must be said) and characterisation, to an explicit extract of that film shown in "Volver". If the desire to do "Belìssima" is so obvious, why not then just do a full remake of it? It would be better than a half cooked, shy hommage, because it would be a film with its own identity, although a remake, whereas in the case of "Volver", the takes on "Belìssima" are contrived, self-indulgent and awkward. And Penèlope Cruz is definitely not an actress for neo-realism and in this case, she was clearly out of her league, having to be dubbed in a singing scene that didn't even have to be in the film (another self-indulgent decision, or "instinct", as Pedro Almodóvar calls it, in his Time Out interview), making it more awkward and embarrassing to watch. The same happened in "Talk to her", in a scene where Caetano Veloso simply appears singing in a party, where friends of Almodóvar are gathered in cameos. This sort of self-indulgence gets in the way of what could have been a tighter, more concentrated film and spoils much of its impact, as it did here in "Volver' .
Apart from that, I also think that the film shows a light-hearted attitude towards death and liked the way women bonded and helped each other, particularly in a scene involving the preparation of a meal.
It was also great to see Carmen Maura reunited with Almodóvar after almost 20 years, a fact very fittingly used in the this film, giving it more resonance and depth to the character.
In spite of missing the subversive comedies he made in the 80's, I still like the dramas he's made such as "Tie me up, tie me down", "Live Flesh" and "All about my mother". Those remain among my favourite Almodóvar films and it proves you can create affecting, great films without too much melodrama, so my message to him is: hold the "water works" and sharpen up your instincts towards the personal self-indulgences. Posted on Aug 11 2006 10:19 - Report as inappropriate
-
- Barbara Michel said...
- Hello I cannot imagine why you left Talk to Her off the Almodovar filmmography. It is arguably his best film and one that is deeply humane; the words of one of the characters spoken near the end of the film are haunting: "nothing is simple," she says, and, as life goes on, we find it is not. Barbara Michel Posted on Aug 11 2006 09:21
- Report as inappropriate
Most popular on this site
Features
Bridesmaid revisited
Anne Hathaway crashes more than a wedding in Rachel Getting Married.
Old-school house
Even in the age of the multiplex, a few old movie theaters continue to thrive in NYC.
Keeping the faith
Hope abounds in Spike Lee’s latest—as it does in the director himself.
Going the distance
TONY toughs out the Toronto International Film Festival, blow by blow.
Race you to the top
Tyler Perry doesn’t need critics—and may not need new audiences.
Spanish intuition
Scarlett Johansson and Rebecca Hall flirt away an Iberian summer in Vicky Cristina Barcelona.




What do you think?
Post your comment now