Film

What's on at the cinema plus reviews of the latest movie and DVD releases

 

  • Print this page
  • Send to a friend

Darren Aronofsky Q&A

The director of 'Pi' and Requiem for a Dream' discusses his new film, 'The Fountain'.

Jan 17 2007

Darren Aronofsky says 'The Fountain' is 'A post-'Matrix', metaphysical science fiction movie.' His producer, Eric Watson, calls it 'a love poem to death'. Fans say 'That wasn't a movie, man, that was an experience.' One detractor tagged it 'A pile of time-travelling Kabbalistic balderdash.' The director of 'Pi' and 'Requiem for a Dream' talks about his trippy space oddity.

'The Fountain' is science fiction, but not as we know it.

It is science fiction, but it's more interested in inner space than it is in outer space. Recent sci-fi has been hijacked by laser guns and hardware, what I call 'techno lust'; but there is a long tradition of using the genre to explore ideas. Also, ever since 'The Terminator' and 'The Matrix', we've been living in a computer-generated universe. So the look and design of 'The Fountain' is partly a reaction to that. You might say 'The Fountain' is a fairy tale for adults. It starts 'Once upon a time . . .' and it ends happily ever after.

The film has three time frames: the twenty-sixth century, with Hugh Jackman in a bubble spaceship; the sixteenth century, in which the Spanish queen Isabel (Rachel Weisz) sends a conquistador to steal the Mayan people's Fountain of Youth; and the present, in which scientist Tommy Creo searches for a cure for his wife's cancer. How did that develop?

We started off with David Bowie's 'Space Oddity'. The astronaut Tom Creo is floating around in space – but not in a tin can. We also knew we wanted to mix in some historical adventure, so very early on we introduced the stuff about the Mayan myth of eternal life. Later on, we realised that the film would have to be grounded in the present. Those two strands needed a powerful emotional underpinning, and love is the most powerful emotion.

The film took more than six years to make. Brad Pitt left the project and the original $70 million budget was halved. Did you still hold fast to your original ideas?

Yes, that long period of gestation was an advantage for me, I think. That's why we were able to make the film for a relatively small amount of money, yet create such a complex, inter-locking structure and a depth of visual detail.

Was the decision not to use CG effects financial or aesthetic?

It was entirely an aesthetic decision. For the past 15 years we've been living in a CG universe, but I wanted to do something completely different. We found this amazing English guy, Peter Parks, who's been beavering away in a converted cowshed outside Oxford for the past 20 years, creating incredible effects with cloud tanks and liquids. Then we fed his amazing raw material – sometimes just images of yeast growing – into a computer and got our digital artists to make it look a bit more celestial. But all those incredible images of space were shot under a microscope.

You planned to shoot the Mayan jungle scenes on location, but for budgetary reasons had to shoot in a studio. Was that a hindrance?

Since we were trying to create our own cohesive universe, it definitely helped. The nice thing about building and shooting everything in a studio is that you really are in complete control of everything: the designs, the weather, the atmosphere, the lighting, every single colour. I like that feeling, because it does create its own world, its own reality.

Kubrick's '2001: A Space Odyssey' was criticised for being a cinematic 'trip' rather than a movie? Do you see any parallels?

I'm not going to compare my movie to '2001', but it's true that Kubrick got a lot of flack, because it was a very abstract and experimental film. But now those images and ideas are part of our consciousness.
People are used to more linear storytelling, do find 'The Fountain' challenging. But there's nothing that original about braiding together a tapestry of themes and telling a story in a poetic, circular fashion. The important thing for audiences to know is that 'The Fountain' is more of an experience than a movie.

'The Fountain' opens on January 26.

  • Print this page
  • Send to a friend

User comments on this story

  • Annne Hedley said...
    First of all thank you it is excellent to have a feedback from comments made.
    I feel that Stephen is more in tune with the film and this film I willnot miss under any circumstances.
    Not really sure where Rub is coming from - everyone sayes how difference this film is and how amazinf the performances were but because largely the audiences had to think these not only dismissed the film but the extra ordinary talents of its star. Posted on Jan 23 2007 20:20
    Report as inappropriate
  • Stephen Christian said...
    To all of you in the UK who long for a film experience that is genuinely imaginative, provocative yet deeply, tenderly comforting, see The Fountain. Rarely have I wondered if critics and I saw the same movie. OK, it takes huge risks, it isn't afraid to sound very out-there when you try to summarize it, but that's the mission of art, isn't it? For me, The Fountain perfectly expressed a saying of the Buddha: "The mind is devoid of mind, for the nature of mind is clear light." If you can seriously consider "clear light" as a way to exist if you can give up enough of ego and limited petty ways of living, and truly open up to the universe, and you can imagine taking love and courage (two names for the same thing) as far as they can go, then The Fountain is for you! Posted on Jan 23 2007 15:19
    Report as inappropriate
  • The Rub said...
    Some good ideas but it seems to draw inspiration largely from the older film Orlando. Not exactly fresh or new in any way at all unlike PI. Posted on Jan 20 2007 09:44
    Report as inappropriate
  • Anne Hedley said...
    I have been waiting so impatiently for this film as I believe that it will be an experience I will not forget. As soon as it hits my local cinema I will be there.I have read reviews, ciritics and seen trailers and it looks a wonderous science fiction love story beautifully staged and directed
    I have read many reviews of the main stars and that Hugh Jackman is amazing in his roles and I sincerely hope that he is recognised for this - he has more than proven himself as a Top A List actor. His co-star Rachel Weiss is a beautiful and accomplished actress and their partnership I feel will be one of the very best in movie for a long long time. Posted on Jan 19 2007 12:19
    Report as inappropriate
4 user comments

What do you think?
Post your comment now

*mandatory fields





Features

The divine comedy

The divine comedy

Film Forum honors Carole Lombard, cinema's funniest lady.

From here to maternity

Catherine Deneuve, belle maman, reigns in A Christmas Tale.

Van Dammage

With the metamovie JCVD, the Muscles from Brussels hopes to flex his acting chops.

Kind of blue

Elizabeth Banks comes undone in Zack and Miri Make a Porno.

Sim city

Charlie Kaufman dreams up a portrait of the artist as a control freak.

Oliver's army

W. returns Hollywood's provocateur to the big political canvas.

Bridesmaid revisited

Anne Hathaway crashes more than a wedding in Rachel Getting Married.