Film

Movie theaters, reviews and showtimes in New York, plus articles, trailers and more

 

Dracula (1992)

Director: Francis Ford Coppola

Average user rating
2 reviews

Movie review

From Time Out Film Guide

From the moment Dracula (Oldman) trails a bloodied razor across his tongue with a look of ecstasy, you know that this version, going back to source in Stoker's novel, isn't going to offer a silver-tongued bloodsucker hovering over swooning damsels. In the opening sequences, Dracula's soul-mate Elisabeta (Ryder) commits suicide in the mistaken belief that he had died in battle. Forsaking God, he seems doomed to an endless existence of guilt and loneliness, until lawyer Jonathan Harker (Reeves) shows him a picture of his fiancée, who just happens to be the spitting image of Elisabeta. A gorgeous, stylised adaptation, full of visual tricks and dazzling camerawork, this places the emphasis firmly on perverse, rampant eroticism. Equally forceful is Oldman's extraordinary performance, especially in his older guise, complete with bouffant hairdo and elongated fingers. In contrast to Hopkins' aggressive performance as vampire-hunter Van Helsing, a stupefied Reeves puts in a hopeless show of defiance. This lack of a convincing central dynamic leads to the occasional sense that the film is little more than a spectacular edifice, but you'll be too spellbound to resist seduction.

Author: CM 0000-00-00 00:00:00

Time Out Film Guide


  • Print this page
  • Send to a friend

User reviews of this film

  • S Colban said...
    Posted on Sep 08 2009 19:57 Oldmans` preformance was brilliant : a lot of detail-reseach went into the script and Gary wasted non of it eg the 14th Century mannerism,Knights` Chivlarous qualities.His physic was very true to life - I can think of two Great generals,who,if you didn`t know them would pass them off as whimps (Sitting Bull,Von Mantufel).Hopkins performance was excellent as always and so were the other actors - each played a vital ingredient that made this the best Dracula Film to date.I could go on - the Nosferateau-silent-movie touch of....
    Report as inappropriate
  • S Colban said...
    Posted on Sep 08 2009 19:57 Oldmans` preformance was brilliant : a lot of detail-reseach went into the script and Gary wasted non of it eg the 14th Century mannerism,Knights` Chivlarous qualities.His physic was very true to life - I can think of two Great generals,who,if you didn`t know them would pass them off as whimps (Sitting Bull,Von Mantufel).Hopkins performance was excellent as always and so were the other actors - each played a vital ingredient that made this the best Dracula Film to date.I could go on - the Nosferateau-silent-movie touch of....
    Report as inappropriate

What do you think?
Post your review now

clear rating
Min 1 star. Zero stars will be treated as unrated.

*mandatory fields





Features

Making a name for himself

Making a name for himself

Sin Nombre's Cary Joji Fukunaga learned his lessons well.

To the letter

Forty years later, Costa-Gavras's Z still brims with fury.

Mind over matter

David Cronenberg reflects on a most bizarre body: his own corpus of work.

Fool's gold

Can an Oscar win lead to a cursed career? Here are five stories of postaward professional meltdowns.

We are the championed

Terrorists and teens abound in this year's "Film Comment Selects."

A history of violence

Matteo Garrone's kaleidoscopic Gomorrah wallops you with Italy's crime crisis.

True romantic

James Gray exchanges urban amorality for amour in Two Lovers.

Playing in the dark

MoMA salutes pianist Stuart Oderman's 50 years as the one-man sound of silents.

Junk bonds

Cast and crew recall the making of the classic NYC drug drama The Panic in Needle Park.