Film

Movie theaters, reviews and showtimes in New York, plus articles, trailers and more

 

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007)

Director: David Yates

4

Critics' rating

Average user rating
10 reviews

Synopsis

Harry returns for a fifth year at Hogwarts School and discovers that most of the wizard community is in denial about his recent encounter with Lord Voldemort. Cornelius Fudge, the Minister for Magic, appoints a new Defence Against the Dark Arts teacher to watch over the students, as he fears that the Hogwarts headmaster is lying about Voldemort’s return. Unfortunately, the newly appointed teacher’s ministry-approved course leaves the students unprepared and unable to defend themselves, so Harry decides to take matters into his own hands.

Movie review

From Time Out New York

Non-Potterites will yawn: another one? (Two more to go.) But it’s only fair to mention that Harry and the gang haven’t been kids in pointy hats for a while now. These days, the saga is all awkward first kisses, internal power grabs at hallowed Hogwarts and the increasingly vexed expressions of Daniel Radcliffe, maturing into an angry young man right before our eyes.

Installment five boosts his rebellion to enjoyable levels of British pique—not exactly Lindsay Anderson’s if… but maybe Pink Floyd: The Wall—as the young magician and his teenage friends secretly assemble against starchy headmistress Dolores Umbridge (Vera Drake’s Staunton, having a ball in high Thatcherite dudgeon).

The Order of the Phoenix is also one of J.K. Rowling’s darker books, with hints of random terrorism and blood revenge. Brit TV helmer David Yates doesn’t shy away from the inky notes or the narrative’s sheer length, but he also seems to know where his bread is buttered. The spells and creatures are playful, and I’d trade the whole of the movie franchise so far for the comic scenes with little Evanna Lynch, age 15, as mysterious Luna Lovegood: dreamy, distracted and—if Harry knows what’s good for him—the future.

Author: Joshua Rothkopf 2007-07-10 02:21:17

Time Out New York Issue 124: July 5-11, 2007


  • Print this page
  • Send to a friend

User reviews of this film

  • Jonathan said...
    Posted on Jul 09 2009 12:58 I'm gonna be totally honest - this film was the worst. Extremely bad connection with the characters and I didn't feel the ''magic'' or the ''Harry Potter atmosphere'' in the film. The book was marvellous, but because the shittest director Britain has vere seen directed this it turned out to be a pile of bollocks, The film just felt very empty and and there was not the usual feeling you normally get with the HP franchise. Overall a poor result, and I HOPE the next film will be much better - don't expect anything great though :(
    Report as inappropriate
  • Dec said...
    Posted on May 02 2009 13:56 the 5th film was shit... it was the best and longest book and the worst and one of the shortest films... too much was focused on the effects and the big scenes but the film was terribley done... if yoo read the book you should hate the film, it missed half the book out, didnt even explain alot of things... the parts with the newspapers was obviously just to fill in what they couldnt be bothered to film... over all, a horrible film, i hope the next one will be much better, but since its the worst director so far and he probably doesnt care much about the books, it will ruin it.
    Report as inappropriate
  • Jonathan Heggie said...
    Posted on Jan 05 2009 09:46 Shit.
    (P.S: Daniel Radcliffe is FITTTT, I definitely would)
    Report as inappropriate
  • El Prince said...
    Posted on Oct 15 2007 10:10 It was brilliant, but I didn't cope up with the events. The best scene was the duel between Dumbledore and Voldemort.
    Report as inappropriate
  • ankittta said...
    Posted on Sep 08 2007 05:47 it was a good movie
    Report as inappropriate
  • Jennifer said...
    Posted on Jul 26 2007 22:15 Honestly, I think that the young actors have come a long way from the very first movie, and developed a depth as actors - I couldn't stand Radcliff in the first one, but he has truly grown and is on his way to becoming a fine actor - I think that both Watson & the dude playing Ron (sorry forgot name) have the same potential.
    Truthfully, you all, lighten up. It's entertaining, well shot... I do have to agree with the deviations towards the end. When they were in the room I found myself going "why do I remember something completely different???" Personally, I could have done without Helena Bonham Carter & the very canned weird, quirky Goth type of character that seems to have become her new specialty. I used to love her as an actress.... a long time ago...
    Report as inappropriate
  • joe said...
    Posted on Jul 17 2007 05:38 I liked it!
    Report as inappropriate
  • Andy said...
    Posted on Jul 14 2007 08:24 I enjoyed the film but you had to know the story to keep up. As a film it was OK but I was dissappointed with deviations from the book with chunks missed out or changed which for me lost their impact and integrity with the original script. Pehaps thats being picky. JKR appears to be happy with the films.
    Report as inappropriate
  • Singe said...
    Posted on Jul 12 2007 19:02 I'm sure the book must be better than this - the story is no further on by the end of the movie, too many characters appear without clear introduction for non=book readers, and the whole thing lacks any depth - stopped caring about the characters! Sorry.............
    Report as inappropriate
  • lain said...
    Posted on Jul 11 2007 08:01 Yawn! It seemed like a filler, and don't they have acting coaches, someone needs to help emma watson out!
    Report as inappropriate
10 comments

What do you think?
Post your review now

clear rating
Min 1 star. Zero stars will be treated as unrated.

*mandatory fields





Features

Making a name for himself

Making a name for himself

Sin Nombre's Cary Joji Fukunaga learned his lessons well.

To the letter

Forty years later, Costa-Gavras's Z still brims with fury.

Mind over matter

David Cronenberg reflects on a most bizarre body: his own corpus of work.

Fool's gold

Can an Oscar win lead to a cursed career? Here are five stories of postaward professional meltdowns.

We are the championed

Terrorists and teens abound in this year's "Film Comment Selects."

A history of violence

Matteo Garrone's kaleidoscopic Gomorrah wallops you with Italy's crime crisis.

True romantic

James Gray exchanges urban amorality for amour in Two Lovers.

Playing in the dark

MoMA salutes pianist Stuart Oderman's 50 years as the one-man sound of silents.

Junk bonds

Cast and crew recall the making of the classic NYC drug drama The Panic in Needle Park.