Film

Movie theaters, reviews and showtimes in New York, plus articles, trailers and more

 

Eragon (2006)

Director: Stefan Fangmeier

Average user rating
4 reviews

Synopsis

The first of a planned trilogy of fantasy epics based on the best-selling novels by Christopher Paolini. Eragon, a young country boy, thinks it’s his lucky day when he finds a mysterious blue stone in the forest. But out of the egg hatches a dragon which reveals to him that his fate is linked with that of the Empire of Alagaesia itself. Eragon is forced to leave his simple life behind as he is thrust into a world of ancient magic and mysterious powers on his way to becoming a Dragon Rider. The future of Alagaesia is in his hands.

Movie review

From Time Out London

Adapted from a children's novel by precocious teenager Christopher Paolini, this cut-and-paste 'sword and sorcery' film is a painful reminder of what fantasy cinema was like before the 'Lord of the Rings' trilogy re-wrote the rules. Ineptly directed by visual effects supervisor Fangmeier, the predictable storyline lumbers from scene to scene like a wounded, flightless dragon. Newcomer Speelers plays the more-anodyne-than-Anakin hero, Eragon, a reluctant dragon rider destined to free his people from the tyrannical King Galbatorix (Malkovich), head-case sorcerer Durza (Carlyle), and hordes of tattooed Urgal berserkers. Encouraged by his care-worn mentor, Brom (Irons), Eragon grows into his role as a spell-casting, sword-wielding avenger. Just as female dragon Saphira (voiced by Rachel Weisz) grows rapidly from a blinky-eyed baby to a napalm-breathing nemesis. Inevitably, the story culminates with an epic confrontation between the Eragon-led Varden rebels and the shape-shifting Durza's ugly Urgal army. Sienna Guillory's winsome elf princess Arya supplies the nascent love interest. Malkovich shows an understandable lack of interest.

Author: Nigel Floyd 2006-12-12 10:40:31

Time Out London Issue 1895: December 13-20 2006


  • Print this page
  • Send to a friend

User reviews of this film

  • Twilight said...
    Posted on Jun 30 2008 00:18 The movie was completely pathetic, it took a good quality book, and reduced it to short, thoughtless, and uncreative film. I ask anyone reading this to not judge the book by the film. The two share virtually no resemblence.
    Report as inappropriate
  • Hit57High said...
    Posted on Feb 25 2008 16:16 A great film. Doesn't get the credit it deserves.
    Report as inappropriate
  • dukie said...
    Posted on Jan 14 2008 09:57 dukie dukie
    Report as inappropriate
  • Jc said...
    Posted on Jul 10 2007 15:34 This movie would be funnier than a comedy if that didn't make it such a sad piece of "work".
    Report as inappropriate
4 comments

What do you think?
Post your review now

clear rating
Min 1 star. Zero stars will be treated as unrated.

*mandatory fields





Features

Making a name for himself

Making a name for himself

Sin Nombre's Cary Joji Fukunaga learned his lessons well.

To the letter

Forty years later, Costa-Gavras's Z still brims with fury.

Mind over matter

David Cronenberg reflects on a most bizarre body: his own corpus of work.

Fool's gold

Can an Oscar win lead to a cursed career? Here are five stories of postaward professional meltdowns.

We are the championed

Terrorists and teens abound in this year's "Film Comment Selects."

A history of violence

Matteo Garrone's kaleidoscopic Gomorrah wallops you with Italy's crime crisis.

True romantic

James Gray exchanges urban amorality for amour in Two Lovers.

Playing in the dark

MoMA salutes pianist Stuart Oderman's 50 years as the one-man sound of silents.

Junk bonds

Cast and crew recall the making of the classic NYC drug drama The Panic in Needle Park.