Film

Movie theaters, reviews and showtimes in New York, plus articles, trailers and more

 

Funny Games (2007)

Director: Michael Haneke

3

Critics' rating

Average user rating
3 reviews

Synopsis

For his English-language debut, master agitator Michael Haneke relocates his own 1997 thriller about a violent home invasion to Long Island.

Movie review

From Time Out New York

Austria’s king of pain, Michael Haneke, has remade his own 1997 home-invasion thriller with Hollywood actors, preserving every chilly composition and scalpel-like edit as if to say, “I got it right the first time.” Even if you ignore the self-fellating pretension of such an exercise (not to mention Haneke’s sad squandering of his own stateside momentum post-Caché), a small fact niggles. Funny Games wasn’t so perfect to begin with. Even in 1997, it felt didactic: Here is the pretty white gate that a rich family will glide by to their summer house. Here are the shiny golf clubs, sure to become weapons. The killers are preppy teenage brats; one talks right to the lens like Ferris Bueller. Aggressively, Haneke lets us know they have no motive. You want to scream—not at the violence but at the archness.

And still, the “new” Funny Games has a certain cool, academic appeal, probably more so for comparative viewers. Lord knows why Naomi Watts would want to executive-produce a movie in which she’s beaten, stripped and debased, but her performance is a live wire of fear. The way the original’s Susanne Lothar wailed “I love you” to her hobbled husband was heartbreaking; Watts’s hushed whispering of the line connotes a strange sense of shame. (Has any actor subverted these words more?) Darius Khondji, the cinematographer of Seven, imports a palpably humid Long Island mustiness to Haneke’s frame; the film is shot on location. But these are creative exceptions in a sour project that defines anti-imaginative. Funny games, indeed.

Author: Joshua Rothkopf 2008-03-11 16:37:14

Time Out New York Issue 650: March 13–19, 2008


  • Print this page
  • Send to a friend

User reviews of this film

  • Evan said...
    Posted on Aug 06 2009 00:33 Talk about pretentious, you all really need to stop it. This movie was fantastic in my honest opinion. I may not have seen the original but I don't need to see it to know that this movie was a psychological masterpiece. Get off of your damn high horses and try to enjoy a movie for once. I bet you'd all love G-Force.
    Report as inappropriate
  • Amanda. said...
    Posted on Apr 05 2009 20:07 This was the most stupid, unrealistic film ive ever watched. DO NOT waste 2 hours of your time watching this. Its a joke. Not a film.
    Report as inappropriate
  • Nomad said...
    Posted on Mar 07 2008 05:16 Isn't it a shame indeed. Why are acclaimed filmmakers wasting time to remake their best work in English. Please use your valuable time to work out new ideas.
    Report as inappropriate

What do you think?
Post your review now

clear rating
Min 1 star. Zero stars will be treated as unrated.

*mandatory fields





Features

Making a name for himself

Making a name for himself

Sin Nombre's Cary Joji Fukunaga learned his lessons well.

To the letter

Forty years later, Costa-Gavras's Z still brims with fury.

Mind over matter

David Cronenberg reflects on a most bizarre body: his own corpus of work.

Fool's gold

Can an Oscar win lead to a cursed career? Here are five stories of postaward professional meltdowns.

We are the championed

Terrorists and teens abound in this year's "Film Comment Selects."

A history of violence

Matteo Garrone's kaleidoscopic Gomorrah wallops you with Italy's crime crisis.

True romantic

James Gray exchanges urban amorality for amour in Two Lovers.

Playing in the dark

MoMA salutes pianist Stuart Oderman's 50 years as the one-man sound of silents.

Junk bonds

Cast and crew recall the making of the classic NYC drug drama The Panic in Needle Park.