Film

Movie theaters, reviews and showtimes in New York, plus articles, trailers and more

 

Welcome Home Roscoe Jenkins (2008)

Director: Malcolm D Lee

2

Critics' rating

Average user rating
2 reviews

Movie review

From Time Out New York

Of Big Momma, Madea and Norbit’s Rasputia, the first character is the one you’d most like to cuddle up with. The same can be said of Martin Lawrence, who is likable onscreen only when wearing a size-28 frock. As Roscoe Jenkins, a talk-show host returning to his parents’ Georgia home for a family reunion after a nine-year absence, Lawrence has taken to heart his narcissistically wounded character’s philosophy of “team of me.”

Fortunately, house-cured hams Mike Epps, Cedric the Entertainer—both playing Roscoe’s cousins—and especially Mo’Nique (when will she have her own big-girl movie franchise?) as Roscoe’s sister know how to give their all to the crowd. Yet they’re not enough to save this puerile mess, one that frequently relies on animal effluvia for laughs—especially disappointing considering that director Malcolm D. Lee’s last two films, Undercover Brother and Roll Bounce, were warm, funny nostalgia trips. But maybe this is just pointless caviling: The preview audience I saw this with erupted into song anytime a Whitney Houston jam was on the soundtrack. Nominally a one-star film, I’ll add another just for the supreme pleasure of seeing Mo’Nique beat the bejesus out of her arrogant costar.

Author: Melissa Anderson 2008-02-05 17:42:08

Time Out New York Issue 645: February 7-13,2008


  • Print this page
  • Send to a friend

User reviews of this film

  • linda said...
    Posted on Mar 08 2008 08:25 This movie was so funny, I enjoyed watching it. If you want to forget your troubles for a couple of hours or even a couple of days (smile). You need to go and see this movie. This movie could be anyone family"
    Report as inappropriate
  • lori said...
    Posted on Feb 10 2008 14:56 Just finished reading the reviews on Welcome Home Roscoe Jenkins. I agree with a user review that I read which said “I don’t know what movie you sneaked into see but this one was hilarious. I was present at the Arlington Movie Grill in Arlington, Texas for the 8pm showing. I heard the audience laughter and reaction. The house was in stitches most of the night. This was a Martin Lawrence Film. You were supposed to be entertained. It did that. People laughed throughout most of the movie. It did its job. It was not a deeply philosophic movie. The move presented good family values. Much has been written about certain areas.
    1. The broad slap-stick comedy. This was Martin Lawrence. Did you expect hearts and flowers?
    2. Yes, there were a lot of sexual innuendos. No real skin was seen. The camera work was done skillfully. If you were offended, it was your mind filling in the blanks.
    3. There was a family some said were “obese”. Since so much is said of the obesity in America today to have all size 8’s in a family would be rather unrealistic. The statuesque Liz Mikel, the mother of that family, played her role graciously. In one of the final scenes, her husband (Michael Clark Duncan) lays his head on her ample breast as they are dancing. It is a touching scene that symbolized the family cohesivness. The gracious matriarch and patriarch of the family played their roles beautifully as the sensible and loving anchors of the family. One critic said ;”There was no way they could have raised this family.” Of course none of us know dysfunctional people who came from gracious loving parents. What planet did you say you lived on?
    4. Much was said of the dog scene. Okay let’s break this down. In the scene, a tiny dog falls in love with a big) dog. She actually initiates the mating and subsequent scenes show them cuddling and obviously in doggy love. The refused to go back to her obnoxious mistress to the glittery world of Hollywood. Now does anyone have idea why reviewers found that story line so distasteful
    5. There were complaints that there were Black stereotypes. Yes, there were. There are stereotypes of many different ethnicities in our culture. The ability to point these out, take them to the extreme, and laugh at them is what maturity and diversity is about.
    6. . A criticism was made because a pregnant character sipped at a wine spiked punch. She prefaced doing this however by saying, “My doctor said I could drink a glass of wine.” The movie was responsible enough to explain this action. And face it, folks, in the days before we knew about “fetal alcohol syndrome” expectant mothers were encouraged to have some wine to help them and the baby relax.
    I would urge you to go see this film for yourself. You might shift around in your seat a bit if your recognize yourself or family members. (And probably you will, no matter what your race is. These characters are truly universal!) Mostly expect to laugh!
    Report as inappropriate

What do you think?
Post your review now

clear rating
Min 1 star. Zero stars will be treated as unrated.

*mandatory fields





Features

Making a name for himself

Making a name for himself

Sin Nombre's Cary Joji Fukunaga learned his lessons well.

To the letter

Forty years later, Costa-Gavras's Z still brims with fury.

Mind over matter

David Cronenberg reflects on a most bizarre body: his own corpus of work.

Fool's gold

Can an Oscar win lead to a cursed career? Here are five stories of postaward professional meltdowns.

We are the championed

Terrorists and teens abound in this year's "Film Comment Selects."

A history of violence

Matteo Garrone's kaleidoscopic Gomorrah wallops you with Italy's crime crisis.

True romantic

James Gray exchanges urban amorality for amour in Two Lovers.

Playing in the dark

MoMA salutes pianist Stuart Oderman's 50 years as the one-man sound of silents.

Junk bonds

Cast and crew recall the making of the classic NYC drug drama The Panic in Needle Park.