Film

Movie theaters, reviews and showtimes in New York, plus articles, trailers and more

 

W. (2008)

Director: Oliver Stone

4

Critics' rating

Average user rating
1 review

Synopsis

Oliver Stone psychoanalyzes a sitting president.

Movie review

From Time Out New York

He is arguably the single most divisive commander in chief in our nation’s history. So when documenting the life of George Walker Bush, one question prevails: Do you portray him as the bold leader our country deserves or the quintessential ugly American? Remarkably, Oliver Stone has opted for neither extreme; he may be a filmmaker of rage and righteousness, but the director of Nixon has made a biopic that doesn’t bury or praise our 43rd President. W. is his crack at examining Dubya’s checkered past, rise to the pinnacle of power and “plan” for war with as much objectivity as humanly possible. The bigger surprise: Stone has damn near done it.

Oh, there’s plenty to debate: As played by Josh Brolin, this is a Bush who’s nakedly ambitious, an out-of-touch bully and no friend to the English language. Yet even advocates will admire how Brolin never relies on parody; the chimp-like chuckle and the condescending smile are present but muted. That the film treats the President with some sympathy—Bush is oedipally obsessed, perpetually trying to please “Poppy” (Cromwell)—will piss off those who feel his policies are glossed over while, outside the multiplex, Rome burns. Indeed, W.’s Freudian overview occasionally dominates the proceedings to a fault. Selectivity regarding your subject is one thing; simplistic Daddy-love-me reductionism is another.

But credit Stone—and a cast devoted to performances over impersonations (both Jeffrey Wright and Thandie Newton, as Colin Powell and Condi Rice, deserve statues)—for pulling off something that seemed impossible. There’s no lack of panache in the film’s portrayal of contentious history—it’s a movie that fans of Candide, Dr. Strangelove and Eugene O’Neill can all claim as their own. Yet W.’s black comedy and familial drama do ultimately serve a substantial single goal. Stone searched for an inner life within a public figure who’s only scrutinized in opinionated sound-bite punditry; endeavors this even-handed and entertaining shouldn’t be misunderestimated.

Author: David Fear 2008-10-14 17:28:15

Time Out New York Issue 681: October 16 - 22, 2008


  • Print this page
  • Send to a friend

User reviews of this film

  • Stan zuckerman said...
    Posted on Oct 26 2008 00:39 Most reviews see this movie as a psuedo- psychanalysis of George W. Bush. they miss the point. It is rather a strking and briilant account of the simplicity of evil.
    Report as inappropriate

What do you think?
Post your review now

clear rating
Min 1 star. Zero stars will be treated as unrated.

*mandatory fields





Features

Making a name for himself

Making a name for himself

Sin Nombre's Cary Joji Fukunaga learned his lessons well.

To the letter

Forty years later, Costa-Gavras's Z still brims with fury.

Mind over matter

David Cronenberg reflects on a most bizarre body: his own corpus of work.

Fool's gold

Can an Oscar win lead to a cursed career? Here are five stories of postaward professional meltdowns.

We are the championed

Terrorists and teens abound in this year's "Film Comment Selects."

A history of violence

Matteo Garrone's kaleidoscopic Gomorrah wallops you with Italy's crime crisis.

True romantic

James Gray exchanges urban amorality for amour in Two Lovers.

Playing in the dark

MoMA salutes pianist Stuart Oderman's 50 years as the one-man sound of silents.

Junk bonds

Cast and crew recall the making of the classic NYC drug drama The Panic in Needle Park.