Film

What's on at the cinema plus reviews of the latest movie and DVD releases

Updates:

The Godfather Part III (1990)

Director: Francis Ford Coppola

Average user rating

3 reviews

Movie review

From Time Out Film Guide

The chief impression is of déjà vu: extravagant ceremonies, parties, shady meetings behind closed doors. The implausible story doesn't help: Michael Corleone (Pacino), grey and bowed in 1979, misses his ex-wife (Keaton) and kids so much that he decides to abandon crime and make the family business legitimate. If it's nicely ironic that bastard nephew Vincent (Garcia), Michael's right-hand man, is almost psycopathically violent, this strand is weakened when Michael objects to daughter Mary's falling for Vincent. And the unwise insertion of elements from real life - the laundering of money through the Vatican - founders because so many details are skated over that the exact implications of Michael's brush with Old World power-brokers are often obscured. Plot apart - much of which concerns Michael's struggles to defend both his empire and his intergrity against Mafia peers - it often looks like Coppola is going through the motions. The acting is merely passable, several characters are given nothing to do, and Michael's paranoid self-pity lends the film an absurd morality: Coppola expects us to sympathise with the semblance of virtue.

Author: GA 0000-00-00 00:00:00

Time Out Film Guide

Bookmark

User reviews of this film

Nestor said...

Posted on Sep 24 2009 18:57 This sequel tries to hard too hard to match the greatness of its' predecessors. FF Coppola tries to move the move the Corleone family from Regional Hoodlum Importers (GF1) to National Gangster Casino Owners (GF2) to Corrupt International million dollar Financiers (GF3) and it just doesn't fly. On top of that, add the poor acting skills of Sofia Coppola matched up with greats like Al Pacino and it makes it painful to watch her every time she's in a scene. Add to that all the beautiful and expensive sets and scenery and this comes close to failures like monstrous failures like Heavens Gate and Waterworld.

Report as inappropriate
Ron S said...

Posted on Nov 18 2008 04:08 Dreadful - I just wonder why Coppola bothered - its just slapped together and the ending is just silly. Pacino is dreadful, and Coppolla's daughter should have been somewhere else, she does not appear to know why she is in the film.
I agree with previous comments - dont bother with this - but Parts 1 and 2 - ah, that is what film-making should always be

Report as inappropriate
Jack the Bear said...

Posted on Jan 27 2008 12:10 Dire. It is a complete mystery how a director who made the Godfathers I and II should have produced this drivel. Terrible acting; confused plot; no sense of narrative pace; no development of character; complete garbage. Don't ever watch it because it is truly so terrible and Pacino is so lame that it may even may spoil the other Godfather films for you.

Report as inappropriate