Film

What's on at the cinema plus reviews of the latest movie and DVD releases

Funny Ha Ha (2003)

Average user rating

1 review

Movie review

From Time Out London

It’s highly likely that cinematic carbon daters would be caught off guard if asked to place the year of production of Andrew Bujalski’s gently observant and delightfully cine-literate debut, ‘Funny Ha Ha’. Its loyal commitment to the documentary aesthetic of late ’70s American directors like John Cassavetes and the Maysles brothers belies the astonishing fact that it was actually made in 2002. Lank-haired and lonely, Marnie (Kate Dollenmayer) is trapped in postgraduate limbo and in serious need of direction. Helplessly side-lined by the remainder of her clique who are all in the later stages of pairing off and settling down, Marnie does her best to suppress designs on ex-boyfriend, Alex (Christian Rudder), himself a greasy bundle of scatterbrained ineffectuality whose outwardly cheery disposition only serves to perplex her further. The film’s pleasures – and there are many – are similar to those enjoyed during a night in a bar with friends when the conversation flutters naturally between the mundane, the fascinating, the hilarious and the sad.

Filmed in long, hard takes on 16mm stock, the tinny sound and florid colours sit alongside some marvellously ragged dialogue (every sentence containing at least one ‘um’, ‘ah’ or ‘I don’t know’), imbuing the film with a subtle realism that allows us to feel totally comfortable in Marnie’s presence as she runs a gamut of awkwardness into young adulthood. Stripped of any pretensions and harbouring an old-fashioned (some may call it ‘uncool’) fondness for its characters, this is an undoubtedly modest yet wholly pleasurable tale about the difficulties that come with letting go of youth.

Author: David Jenkins

Time Out London Issue 1908: March 14-20 2007

Email Tweet Share

User reviews of this film

Technoguy said...

Posted on Feb 12 2008 19:30 Not LAL funny,just awkward,nerdish,naffly wierd.The central character was merely nice,easily taken in,easily put-upon.she ummed and aahed her way ably through a film with no real dialogue or plot,maybe that was it's point: we were going nowhere,she was too middlingly bland but good to be around.A lot of the young characters could have been left out of an early Woody Allen film.

Report as inappropriate