Film

What's on at the cinema plus reviews of the latest movie and DVD releases

Search cinema listings

Browse cinemas A-Z

Search 20,000 reviews

 

Hostel: Part II (2007)

Director: Eli Roth

2

Time Out rating

Average user rating
22 reviews

Synopsis

In this violent horror sequel, three teenage American girls embark on the holiday of a lifetime backpacking around Europe. Their dream trip turns into a nightmare however, when they find themselves becoming the victims of rich and powerful men who enjoy administering pain and torture.

Movie review

From Time Out London

For all its jokey, fanboy indulgences, Eli Roth’s original slaughterhouse satire did achieve a bleak, visceral intensity. In this boring, blood-drenched sequel, three female American backpackers – party girl Whitney (Bijou Phillips), naive nerd Lorna (Heather Matarazzo) and sensible heiress Beth (Lauren German) – are lured to the same Slovakian torture factory, where flesh-ripping power-tools and Countess Báthory-style blood-baths await them. Meanwhile, a mobile phone auction, complete with photos of the potential victims, attracts wealthy clients who are jaded thrill-seeking sadists with an appetite for human flesh – literally so in the case of ‘Cannibal Holocaust’ director Ruggero Deodato’s lip-smacking cameo.

Once again, Roth is torn between two conflicting impulses: a sly subversion of our worst expectations and an adolescent delight in taboo-breaking. So, on the one hand we have an ‘equal opportunities’ policy that admits women-torturers, and on the other we have the callous killing of children. The female victims are less convincingly drawn than their fleshed-out male abusers – boorish braggart Todd (Richard Burgi) and wimpy wife-hater Stuart (Roger Bart) – although neither man conforms to type. Roth constantly emphasises the Elite Club members’ abuse of money and power, and indeed we identify masochistically with the victims’ suffering rather than the torturers’ sadistic pleasure. Yet there is nothing here that intelligently explores, still less justifies, the writer-director’s dubious assertion that ‘everybody has some side of them that wants to control or abuse another person.’ Although this slow, opportunistic sequel is better written and directed than its predecessor, Roth still talks a better film than he makes. He needs to jettison the geeky in-jokes, grow up and move on.

Author: Nigel Floyd 2007-06-26 11:08:32

Time Out London Issue 1923: June 27-July July 3 2007


  • Print this page
  • Send to a friend

User reviews of this film

  • mr.mike said...
    Posted on Jan 02 2008 01:36 Decent as a rental or pay-per-view. True gorehounds may be somewhat disappointed.
    Report as inappropriate
  • Rob Cordiner said...
    Posted on Dec 27 2007 06:26 Sequel ? Better than the 1st....? Not a hope in HELL !!! U started as you did in all your movies... Brilliant ! Hollywood has now taken over.
    Report as inappropriate
  • Rob Cordiner said...
    Posted on Dec 27 2007 05:58 Wot a load of Americanized CRAP ! Cencored gore, cheap theatrics, cheaper actors/actressess and worst of all, A slap in the face for Tarantino movie fans !!! How dare you !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Report as inappropriate
  • gay said...
    Posted on Aug 03 2007 16:40 ITS GAYY
    Report as inappropriate
  • sabrina said...
    Posted on Aug 01 2007 14:16 dis waz a wiked and a scary film i was shittin in ma pants dey cut da skin in front of ya man all da blood drippin out as if it was a chiken cuttin it in pieces dis is a doctors film
    Report as inappropriate
  • gigi said...
    Posted on Jul 19 2007 11:26 o my word! this has to be the best movie i have ever seen. it was so scary. the perfect horror movie! must see
    Report as inappropriate
  • Emma said...
    Posted on Jul 13 2007 15:47 omg it was gud, very gruesome, alot of oh my gods when things got cut off and slashed. but i would recommend
    Report as inappropriate
  • jess said...
    Posted on Jul 10 2007 16:20 it was ok, but no were near as good as the first!!
    Report as inappropriate
  • anon.. said...
    Posted on Jul 09 2007 16:16 the film was grusome and gory, but the plot wasnt as good as the first, bits of it was predictable. but my boyfriend wanted more gore.. not bad, but could be better.
    Report as inappropriate
  • jordan said...
    Posted on Jul 08 2007 16:20 it was disgusting! but still a gd film.
    Report as inappropriate
  • Anita said...
    Posted on Jul 08 2007 10:22 amazing, gruesome and gourey luved it it was 1 of da best films i have ever seen in my whole life, really brill i would defo recommend it 2 anyone between 18 and 30 its ace!
    xxxx
    Report as inappropriate
  • Lauren said...
    Posted on Jul 06 2007 18:33 omg wat a disapointment !!!!! they sudda left it with the first one, not nearly as grusm as the 1st . such a shame i was looking forward 2 this one !
    Report as inappropriate
  • Richard said...
    Posted on Jul 06 2007 18:00 it was ok,but not as good as the original
    Report as inappropriate
  • mark plymouth said...
    Posted on Jul 06 2007 17:55 much better than the first one
    Report as inappropriate
  • jamie said...
    Posted on Jul 05 2007 20:52 i didnt like it
    Report as inappropriate
22 comments: page 1 of 2
1 2

What do you think?
Post your review now

clear rating
Min 1 star. Zero stars will be treated as unrated.

*mandatory fields





Top Stories

Time Out's 101 Films of the Decade

Time Out's 101 Films of the Decade

Ten years, thousands of movies and millions of dollars in international box office, and it all boils down to this

Martin Provost discusses 'Séraphine'

Martin Provost discusses 'Séraphine'

Trevor Johnston talks to the director of 'Séraphine' about bringing a little known French painter back to life

Our verdict on Peter Jackson's The Lovely Bones

Our verdict on Peter Jackson's The Lovely Bones

Peter Jackson ends a triumphant decade with a sentimental misfire with this lush Alice Sebold adaptation

On the set of Ken Loach's 'Route Irish'

On the set of Ken Loach's 'Route Irish'

Dave Calhoun meets Ken Loach on the set of his forthcoming Iraq war movie

Stephen Poliakoff discusses 'Glorious 39'

Stephen Poliakoff discusses 'Glorious 39'

Stephen Poliakoff’s ‘Glorious 39’ is his first film for cinema since ‘Food of Love’ in 1997. Dave Calhoun met him

Is 'Paranormal Activity' the new 'Blair Witch'?

Is 'Paranormal Activity' the new 'Blair Witch'?

How does a film go from DIY experiment to box-office smash? 'Paranormal Activity' director Oren Peli explains

Steven Soderbergh on 'The Informant!' and 'The Girlfriend Experience'

Steven Soderbergh on 'The Informant!' and 'The Girlfriend Experience'

We talk to Steven Soderbergh about his two forthcoming films: one featuring a porn star, the other a chubby Matt Damon

A gateway to all things 'New Moon'

A gateway to all things 'New Moon'

In anticipation of 'The Twilight Saga: New Moon', Time Out is offering the chance to pick up a limited edition pack with three exclusive magazines and a free poster.

The films that deserve a TV spin-off

The films that deserve a TV spin-off

With Roland Emmerich suggesting he'd like to make a '2012' TV spin-off, we propose some more movie-to-TV serialisations

Time Out's 50 greatest animated films with commentary by Terry Gilliam

Time Out's 50 greatest animated films with commentary by Terry Gilliam

In celebration of the release of Pixar's 'Up' and Wes Anderson's 'Fantastic Mr Fox', read our rundown of fifty classic feature length animations