Film

What's on at the cinema plus reviews of the latest movie and DVD releases

Updates:

"[There's] poetry in the way he tortures women." – Kirsten Dunst on Lars...
RT @davecalhoun Best cinema food and drink in London town? The Curzon Soho...
RT @simonjab If you watch one film this weekend, go see Down Terrace...
Meek's Cutoff! RT @ioncinema Complete Venice Film Fest Main Comp Titles...
How does a penguin break a video camera? Gruff Rhys – director/star of...

The Illusionist (2006)

Director: Neil Burger

Average user rating

1 review

Synopsis

The story of the battle between a mysterious stage magician and a determined and principled policeman.

Movie review

From Time Out London

A good magician never explains his tricks, a lesson Neil Burger’s beautifully realised film gives the impression of respecting extremely well, wringing involving drama from its protagonist’s and its own mysterious sleights of hand. Turn-of-the-last-century Vienna, and stage magician Eisenheim (Edward Norton) is performing illusions so astonishing there are rumours he has supernatural powers. Unconvinced, Crown Prince Leopold (Rufus Sewell) assigns Chief Inspector Uhl (Paul Giamatti), to investigate his secrets. Unknown to all, though, the illusionist’s teenage sweetheart, Duchess Sophie von Teschen (Jessica Biel), is the Prince’s ‘intended’ and after she’s ordered to assist Eisenheim onstage, old feelings resurface to ignite a dangerous rivalry.

Like Burger’s 2002 debut, ‘Interview with the Assassin’, ‘The Illusionist’ inhabits a world flickering between reality and illusion; as we follow Uhl’s investigations, we’re kept guessing about whether Eisenheim is the performer of merely unbelievably good tricks or genuine supernatural acts. In its fin de siècle setting, it also flickers between two ages: while the love triangle between lowly hero, fair duchess and evil prince looks back to ancient fairytales, its evocations of cinema’s infancy – sepia palette, iris shots and, in one scene, an early film projector – point to the media-saturated future which, as Eisenheim’s apparent raising of the dead begins to undermine the Prince’s authority, provokes interesting questions about the way illusions consolidate leaders’ powers today. With exquisite performances (Giamatti’s, in particular), it leaves you thrillingly hovering, happily uncommitted to any one interpretation – right until the end, that is, where Uhl seems to figure it all out in a clever-clever turnaround you’d thought the film was above. Or does he? It’s only his explanation, after all.

Author: Nick Funnell 2007-02-27 11:57:04

Time Out London Issue 1906: February 28-March 7 2007