Film

What's on at the cinema plus reviews of the latest movie and DVD releases

Search cinema listings

Browse cinemas A-Z

Search 20,000 reviews

 

3:10 to Yuma (2007)

Director: James Mangold

Time Out rating

Average user rating
14 reviews

Movie review

From Time Out London

Times are tough at the ranch for hobbled Civil War vet Christian Bale, a man powerless to stop his drought stricken-property going to the wall. So, when he grabs an unexpected payday helping the sheriff escort gang leader Russell Crowe across country to the train station where he can be packed off to jail, it’s not just about the money – it’s his chance to do something worthwhile. Trouble is, the prisoner’s henchmen are at large, there’s hostile territory to negotiate, and Crowe’s a master manipulator, with any number of reasons the rancher should accept the thief’s pay-off and spare himself death.

Elmore Leonard’s original story offered a cracking premise for the taut 1957 version and brings a core of tension to this expansive remake. Given that the Western’s an endangered species, it’s understandable James Mangold (‘Walk the Line’) should direct like a man who might never make another one, hence the pumped-up stagecoach chases and revisionist digressions (yes, Chinese coolies pretty much built America’s railroads) which at times threaten to lose sight of the central conflict. It’s all vividly mounted however, done with obvious affection, and if it lacks the laser precision of Delmer Daves’ original, the script brings added moral complexities with a key role for Bale’s adventure-hungry teenage son. The two leads’ sparking byplay, Crowe’s addled cockiness versus Bale’s nervy grit, would grace any surroundings, but it’s a pleasure to revisit the frontier in a drama which feels far more vital than mere nostalgic homage.

Author: Trevor Johnston

Time Out London Issue 1934: September 12-18 2007


  • Print this page
  • Send to a friend

User reviews of this film

  • Michele said...
    Posted on Jun 16 2008 19:16 Love being told I'm retarded for enjoying this movie.
    I got the ending: Crowe's character gets on the train to prevent the young boy from ending up just like him. Not implausible, since Ben Wade said the boy reminded him of himself. The movie's ending is about what path the boy will take. I loved it. Five out of six.
    Report as inappropriate
  • Technoguy said...
    Posted on Mar 18 2008 00:53 Good as westerns go with the two main leads playing well off of each other ,with I thought Christian Bale coming out on top as a down on his luck homesteader trying to make some money and honour in the eyes of his family(he lost a foot in a previous accident).Crowe just played his usual snakey tough guy role that he does in his sleep,with a lashing of charm for the son and the ladies.There was a lot of sharp action sequences and a lot of killing as Bale helps a posse of men escort Crowe,the badman,to the 3;10 to Yuma train to take him to his execution.The ending was toally unbelievable but somehow had poetic justice on it's side.
    Report as inappropriate
  • aldiggitydog said...
    Posted on Jan 27 2008 06:39 This was possibly the least believable movie I have ever seen. Notice how most positive posts are from women, and I'm not sure if that is significant, just noticed. My wife, though, also thought the movie was outrageous, especially the ending. Maybe a remake of a WWII movie where Hitler has a change of heart is the next big thing in Hollywood. Reality was apparanty not a consideration
    Report as inappropriate
  • MB said...
    Posted on Jan 14 2008 23:29 The ending to this film was RIDICULOUS and it completely ruined it. Absolutely stupid beyond belief and anyone who thinks different is completely retarded. I feel cheated that i sat through it, really enjoyed it and then watched in disbelief as it turned into a farcical joke before my very eyes.
    And as for this homophobic nonsense, am i missing something here? What are you people on? Talk about one person reading something into something that doesn't even exist and then everyone jumping on the bandwagon and giving it credence as though it has some sort of basis in reality.
    So to sum the ending up - He's about to strangle him and he says something about wanting to look a hero in front of his son and the next thing he's stopped strangling him and they now form some kind of doubleact jumping across rooftops to get him to the prison train. "Slight change of heart, i was a cold hearted bastard but now i'm going to help you take me to prison so your son doesn't think your a loser, then i'm gonna kill my whole crew who've just moved heaven and earth to save me and then i'll get on the train of my own free will" What a complete joke.
    Report as inappropriate
  • amber said...
    Posted on Dec 09 2007 20:42 it was amazing
    Report as inappropriate
  • Milla said...
    Posted on Oct 13 2007 15:51 A beautiful film. Its colours reminded me a lot of Sergio Leone's westerns, The soundtrack is spot on too.
    Report as inappropriate
  • Andy said...
    Posted on Oct 06 2007 08:30 So... Christian Bale's son was trying to respect his father by him that Russell Crowe was on the train?
    Report as inappropriate
  • May said...
    Posted on Sep 28 2007 15:08 Excellent film. One of the best I have seen for some time. The acting is superb by both Russell Crowe and Christian Bale. My husband and I love westerns and this is one that is like the good old ones. Saw Atonement recently and this film is far superior.
    Report as inappropriate
  • JR said...
    Posted on Sep 26 2007 17:56 A good sample how a bad ending can make an interesting movie, for most of the film, a bad one.
    Report as inappropriate
  • jord said...
    Posted on Sep 19 2007 14:44 exelent
    Report as inappropriate
  • Georgie said...
    Posted on Sep 18 2007 13:06 Brilliant!! My boyfriend's a western film fan, I'm a Christian Bale fan so there was something for both of us. Would definately recommend seeing it just for some great acting, especially by the guy who plays Charlie
    Report as inappropriate
  • nellyporter said...
    Posted on Sep 17 2007 14:41 Wasn't very impressed, especially by the ending which was a real cop out. Starting out promising but got a bit silly towards the end with an unrealistic ending. Don't waste your money..
    Report as inappropriate
  • shinlim said...
    Posted on Sep 15 2007 23:49 Spectacular! The character development is as engrossing as the gun-fights. Crowe plays the amoral captive who plays along with his captors, all the way to the final scene. Go see it!
    Report as inappropriate
  • reza said...
    Posted on Sep 15 2007 17:30 fantastic move really enjoed it
    Report as inappropriate
  • Shreada said...
    Posted on Sep 14 2007 17:11 old fashioned, ok generally.
    Report as inappropriate
18 comments: page 1 of 2
1 2

What do you think?
Post your review now

clear rating
Min 1 star. Zero stars will be treated as unrated.

*mandatory fields





Top Stories

A Farewell To Tartan Films

A Farewell To Tartan Films

To mourn the loss of the great Tartan Films, Time Out remembers a few of the best films to emerge from their impressive canon

Jason Bateman: interview

Jason Bateman: interview

Jason Bateman – star of ‘Hancock’, alongside Will Smith – talks to Time Out about his comic influences and how to pretend to throw a car

Ten Great Head Shots In The Movies

Ten Great Head Shots In The Movies

Lots of people get shot in the head in the new film 'Wanted'. Read our guide to some other great head shots on film

Set visit: 'The Damned United'

Set visit: 'The Damned United'

Dave Calhoun gets his training kit on as he visits the set of a new film about football legend Brian Clough’s torrid spell at Leeds United in the mid-1970s