Search London

  • Bendy boys and Route martyrs

  • A war has broken out between supporters of the bendy bus – led by the Boriswatch blog – and those who want to see Boris’s new Routemaster – led by long-time Boris fan, Andrew Gilligan. Gilligan, in a virulent piece, has accused Boriswatch of getting its figures wrong and provoking ‘unintentional hilarity’ by supporting the despised bendy.

    Interestingly, this view is not borne out by either the statistics or the commentators beneath Gilligan’s own piece, the majority of whom come out in support of the bendy and have been allowed to say so despite the Standard’s ruthless policy of vetting overly critical comments.

    And as for unintentional hilarious, well look no further than Gilligan himself, who Tory Troll reveals has apparently been leaving favourable comments about himself all over the internet under a variety of different names. Did you really think you'd get away with it, Andrew?

    But some interesting arguments lie at the heart of all this froth. Should Boris’s value-for-money campaign promise be compromised by his new Routemaster campaign promise, even if it is going to cost a fortune?

    Is the bendy bus actually as unpopular as we are told?

    And should public transport put dull but essential things like passenger capacity and cost-per-mile above the beauty of good design?

    I'm genuinely undecided by all this. As a bus user, passenger capacity is important, but I dislike bendies, which tend to make the horror of commuting even less appealing. And while I don't have a problem with the state spending money on quality-of-life-raising projects, I do wonder whether this is the best use of the mayor's budget in the current climate and with so many other pressing concerns.

    Any views? Do you hate bendies? Do you think Boris should be spending vast sums on new buses that aren't really needed at a time when he has promised to cut costs? How much do you want a new Routemaster? And isn't this a more interesting controversy than Sachs/Brand/Ross/Satanic Sluts-gate?

    Update:  It appears I've been far too harsh on the Standard's comments policy, given that they've published my query to Mr Gilligan regarding his alleged habit of leaving anonymous comments about himself all over the net.

  • Add your comment to this post

5 comments

  1. Posted by MrMac on 25 Nov 2008 15:30

    Save the bendy bus, it's safer than a double decker. For more details see; save-the-bendy-bus.blogspot.com

  2. Posted by KH on 10 Nov 2008 18:06

    Gilligan used one of his ES columns (3rd July 08) to insert this gem:
    "What the Routemaster symbolised was public-service idealism: a conviction made flesh"
    Wow.
    Then, after constant attacks against Boris Johnson's critics, and obsessive support for the current mayor, Gilligan finishes with this, regarding the Routemaster:
    "It's his only specific manifesto item that most Londoners remember"
    Brilliant.

  3. Posted by Olive on 05 Nov 2008 14:13

    The Bendy Buses are faster than the old route masters, (boarding and disembarking is quicker because passengers don't have to negotiate stairs). This is really important if you want to get people off the tube.
    The major problem is the disregard for rules on the bus, whether its not paying the fare, leaving litter or abusing strangers.
    Instead of spending money designing a new bus, Boris should spend it on conductors for the Bendys.

  4. Posted by Jonny Futuro on 03 Nov 2008 05:42

    Tory Troll's brilliant!
    Hahaha, love a good poke at Andrew Gilligan....
    To bendy or not to bendy? The damage is done, move on and save some cash.

  5. Posted by weepej on 01 Nov 2008 09:15

    I for one am not looking forward to the large scale return of open backed buses. As a cyclist I remember many times having to deal with people jumping off the back of them into my path, and they rarely looked back, only ever forward.
    I would be interested in statistics showing the number of cyclists who were crashed into whilst undertaking emergency manouvres to avoid said pedestrain.
    As for replacing bendies in the meantime I'd rather see one bendy on the road than the two or three vehicles that would have to be used to replace it.
    Nightmare. I'm pretty confident it's just not going to happen though.

Have your say