|
| 'We need to encourage people to do both: cycle and wear a helmet' |
Make headgear compulsory
Franca Tranza, spokesperson for the British Medical Association
Last
year the BMA passed a policy calling for helmet-wearing to be made
compulsory. All cyclists should wear helmets. In the USA, a 30-month
study of 3,854 cyclists showed that helmet usage decreased the risk of
brain injury by 65 per cent and severe brain injury by 74 per cent in
all age groups.There is a concern that making helmets compulsary would
result in a reduction in people cycling, and that is why we need a big
public information campaign to highlight the dangers of not wearing a
helmet and to promote the health benefits of cycling. We need to
encourage people to do both: cycle and wear a helmet. Even though
London’s traffic is quite slow, there are still too many accidents on
our roads. The BMA believes cycling can be made safer by ensuring
everyone wears a helmet
Feature continues
Obey the law
Nick Coleman, driver and cyclist
The
cyclist, in his regalia, flew up the inside of a line of crawling
traffic. As he passed my car, his regalia flicked the tip of my
wing-mirror. The contact he made with the Nissan in front was much
firmer. It was turning left when the bike hit it midships.
|
| Caught in between the 'robot killing machines without a conscience' |
Tunk.
Flump. Pung-pung-pung. This was the sound the cyclist made as he hit,
as he fell, and then as he attempted to kick the Nissan’s passenger
window in. He screamed too. ‘You fucking fucking fucking cunt!’ was all
he had to say. The old lady in the passenger seat cowered, covering her
mouth with one hand, the side of her face with the other. The cyclist
ceased kicking the window after a while, picked up his buckled machine,
threw it down again, offered a final kick at the car and stalked off to
adjust his clothing in the shade of a tree. The Nissan remained in
position, mid-turn, its windows steaming up.
There it all was, revealed as in mythology: the fall of Superman. It was this instant that changed my view of cycling forever.
I
cycle and I drive and I know which is better for the planet. It is
important that we are rewarded for cycling, and that we recognise that
the act of cycling is better than the act of driving. It is equally
important, however, that we do not think of cyclists as being morally
superior to motorists.
Cycling in London is scary and
dangerous. Where there is danger, there is also the instinct to fight.
And where that instinct holds sway, so too does the need to assert
moral superiority. And which member of our society ascribes to himself
the most unassailable moral superiority? Got it in one. Yet which
member of our society goes about breaking the rules most freely – in
the absolute certainty that he has the right to do it because he is
better? Yup, same guy. He jumps lights, mounts pavements, overtakes on
the inside, kicks in the windows of innocent old ladies…
To
most cyclists, cars are not vehicles conveying humans about their
business; they are robot killing machines without a conscience. I know
this from my own experience on a bike. It is discomfiting to feel
small, invisible and as soft as a peach. We need to feel in control,
but that robust feeling is very hard to achieve when you’re on a bike.
You’re slow, you’re unprotected, you’re not setting the agenda, you’re
wearing stupid clothes. You are vulnerable on too many levels. In the
case of Superman in his fight with the Nissan, the feeling of
vulnerability was consummated in the nastiest, most emasculating way.
But none of that made him right or his actions defensible. His actions
are only defensible where, in that philosophical contruct sponsored so
assiduously by the Mayor, the cyclist is deemed the moral superior of
the motorist.
Tendentious bullshit. Cyclists need to let go
of the sense that they ought to be in control of events. They need to
let go of the delusion of moral superiority. Cyclists need to climb
down. We ARE slow, we ARE unprotected, we ARE wearing stupid clothes.
Start from that position – obey the rules, treat motorists and
pedestrians as equals, acknowledge our weakness, wear proper trousers –
and then, when we try to kick glass in the faces of old ladies, we
might begin to deserve the understanding of ordinary mortals.
Nick Coleman writes for the Daily Telegraph
|
|
|
|
19 comments
You've mis-attributed this article about red lights to Buffalo Bill, when in fact it was written by Douglas Carnall. I know because I read a draft before he sent it. You'll be wanting to correct this!
why does mister Gardiner imagine that law-abiding vermin will tend to be regarded more highly than that of the law-breaking variety?
Encouraging cyclists to break the law is not only irresponsible, but does not serve the interests of cyclists in the long term. Cyclists jumping lights only serve to further annoy the cyclophobic motorist. If we want the law to protect us from the worst excesses of white van drivers, Chelsea tractor owners and others that consider us no more than vermin, we should respect the law ourselves. Even if it does add a few minutes to the journey.
Dr Ward says that doctors have been fooled by research about helmet effectiveness. Then the BMA spokesperson gives an example of the outdated research that has been widely discredited.
I am really glad that the BMA have decided to review all the evidence in the future and not be misled by helmet promoters. I am sure that they will return to the view that cycling - with or without a helmet - provides health benefits 20 times greater than the risks.