Your critical guide to arts, culture and going out in the capital

  • Survey results: the truth about bikes in London

  • Sources: Time Out online poll, TFL, NOP/Mintel nationwide survey.

  • The average London cyclist has had his or her bike nicked 0.9 times. The unluckiest rider has had theirs pinched 8 times. One cyclist says, ‘There aren't enough places to lock up your bike! Especially in the West End. There've been loads more cyclists on the streets since last year.’

    The City of London police say that cyclists make up 40% of their road casualties, despite making up only 10% of road users. (City Police)

    A whopping 26% of cyclists say that they’ve been stopped by the police at least once – mostly for jumping lights, but also for riding on the pavements and being drunk in charge of a bike. One rider was stopped for ‘cycling in a laboured way’. Feature continues

    Advertisement

    60% of adult cyclists in London are male, 40% female. Of the cyclists involved in accidents in the first nine months of 2005, almost 80% were male.

    Between January and September 2005, cyclists accounted for 9% of London’s road casualties, 10% of all serious injuries and 11% of all fatalities. Pedestrians and car occupants represented 19% and 46% of all casualties, respectively.

    The borough with highest number of recorded cycling casualties between January and September 2005 was Westminister, with 193 accidents (also the most dangerous place for pedestrians, with 423 incidents).

    The safest borough is Greenwich, with just 44 reported accidents.

    Our poll was split on who cyclists think are the worst road-users: 25% say white vans, and 20% say 4x4s.

    Of the 4,372 pedestrians involved in accidents in London between January and September last year, 67.8% were injured by cars, 3.3% by taxis, 9.2% by buses or coaches, 9% by mopeds or motorbikes – and 1.2% by bicycles.

    One respondant thinks we should ‘make 'at least 1 bike trip through central London during rush-hour an obligatory requirement for everyone holding or aspiring to a Drivers Licence’.

    67% of cyclists have argued with a driver and 69% with a pedestrian. One of the most popular suggestions for improving London for riders is to make it a serious offence to obstruct a cycle lane.

    82% of people in our poll believe that there are not enough cycle lanes in he capital.

    56% of cyclists tell us they sometimes head the wrong way down a one-way street.

    A dubious 41% claim that they never, ever ride on the pavement, while the more honest remainder admit that they do occasionally. Thankfully, nobody said that they always do.

    Your suggestions for how to improve cycling in London include: ‘legalise safe left turns on red lights’, ‘banish cycle lanes and remove railings and segregation from traffic – it encourages more speed’, ‘make residential areas 20 miles per hour to encourage people to cycle on shorter journeys’, and ‘Jeremy Clarkson to be unable to drive for the rest of his natural life’.

  • Add your comment to this feature
  • Page 2: 1 2

15 comments

  1. Posted by Ruth on 23 May 2007 13:28

    Caroline. I couldn't agree with you more. spot on :)

  2. Posted by Jon on 09 Jan 2007 14:25

    The significance of the figure that "cyclists make up 40% of their road casualties, despite making up only 10% of road users." depends entirely on whether this is a count of vehicles or occupants: are bus and car passengers counted as road users?

  3. Posted by Caroline on 28 Sep 2006 10:22

    pedestrians - how many LOOK PROPERLY before stepping into the road? Often if they haven'y 'heard' a car they assume nothing is coming & step out! I have been riding to work everyday in London for 10 years and the only cause of accidents have been motorists mainly 1 - not stopping at give way junctions & 2 - cutting in front to make left turns. Obviously the cyclists comes off worse! I'm not biased, I also drive and ride a scooter, I'm just telling it like it is! After 9/11 there was a huge increase in bad cyclists but hopefully these have now learnt some road sense or gone back to the tubes! This morning I had a pedesrian on a cycle path telling me I shouldn't be using it! Fortunately there was a big 'CYCLE PATH' sign nearby so I soon put him strainght! OK there are bad cyclists - but there are also bad drivers and bad pedestrians - why can't everyone just be a bit more sensible and tolerant and stop thinking they are the only important thing in the universe?!

  4. Posted by susan on 22 Sep 2006 17:10

    Are there different rules for cyclists? Seems as though that is the case. I have had so many close calls but not yet been hit by a cyclist. Those cyclists who are a danger to pedestrians give all the good cyclists a bad name.

  5. Posted by Charlie on 22 Sep 2006 15:33

    Literally every day i leave my workplace near Covent Garden and almost get hit by cyclists jumping the red light at the crossing and ignoring the rules of the road. The other day as I stepped off a bus a cyclist knocked me over by using the bus stop as a traffic short cut. There must be a way to start handing out fines or prosecuting cyclists for this. And it's the vast majority I see who cycle this way.

  6. Posted by Ingvild Holm on 22 Sep 2006 15:28

    I am happy to be alive every day after cycling to and from work. Extreme sport on a daily basis...

  7. Posted by james on 06 Sep 2006 19:37

    Fair enough! But the fair weather ones cycle like they drive - shite. The next one I see wearing a fucking IPod whilst cycling through traffic is getting a smack.

  8. Posted by david on 28 Jul 2006 20:49

    Positive defensive cycling, think ahead, pick a line, hold the line, keep the 'beat' with the surrounding traffic, obey the road rules as the situation demands, don't take chances (you'll always come off second best) can't legislate for idiots on four wheels or two, don't tailgate Kamikazi riders or it will be 'goodnight Irene' sooner or later, be aware, don't put yourself in potential dangerous situations. You can be lit up like a xmas tree but if two or four wheelers don't look you could be dead meat on the street, don't trust anyone on the road to do what you would do, expect the unexpected, keep your cool when all around you . . . get home in one piece. Buena Suerte, Adios

  9. Posted by zoe on 25 Jul 2006 10:45

    Why has nobody mentioned cycle paths??
    Most European cities have more cyclists due to the fact that they have a clear connecting system of dedicated cycleways, set aside from busy roads! London has a token gesture of cycle paths that do not match up and are generally ignored by all other road users!
    London needs to put its money where its mouth is! and take cyclists needs seriously, then not only will cycling be accessible to more people, it will also be safer.

  10. Posted by Jes on 25 Jul 2006 09:26

    How biased! I see now it is acceptable in the eyes of the press to imply that cyclists liars if their answers to a biased survey don't quite match what is expected. A 'dubious 41% claim they never ride on the pavements'. Where are the questions about what causes injury to cyclists? Once again the cyclist is painted as the villian and the motorist - who kills a mere 3000-odd people a year - the victim. Oh please. Get a life. Get a bike!

  11. Posted by David on 23 Jul 2006 20:11

    What a strange survey. You seem blissfully unaware that all available surveys, including one by the AA, show motorist errors as the main cause of cyclist casualties (mainly through the motorist failing to give way at junctions). Are those the accidents you categorised as "unspecified" causes? Marianne is spot on - as any advanced cycle training will tell you, hugging the kerb and related wrong road positioning are the most dangerous things a cyclist can do. And unless you have evidence that all cyclists ride on the pavement (far fetched), you probably got honest answers - although who knows whether the survey was representative, as you haven't tried to find out. Just to state the obvious, virtually all adult cyclists are motorists, by the way.

  12. Posted by d on 21 Jul 2006 20:05

    One point not mentioned:
    The danger bad cyclists pose to other cyclists. In central London you often hit pockets of cyclists at cross roads. When they start to cross the junction it's easy to get caught up between not-so-skilled cyclists....

  13. Posted by t on 21 Jul 2006 15:03

    BIKES RULE!

  14. Posted by Marianne on 21 Jul 2006 09:36

    The gap you found between opinion and behavior reflects nothing so much as the poor quality of your survey questions.
    I may think that running a red light at a busy intersection at full speed is the most dangerous thing some cyclists do (you also failed to ask, dangerous to whom?), and yet occasionally proceed at a deserted red light at a pedestrian crossing after first having come to a full stop.
    Likewise, I may think that *riding without lights* (and possibly additional reflectors on the bike) is very dangerous, but not think reflective clothing is necessary and hence not wear any.
    In addition, you may consider adding the option "Wrong road positioning/ hugging the kerb" to your list of dangerous things next time.

  15. Posted by Paul on 20 Jul 2006 13:58

    Ahh, what a lovely biased report. You'll find that the majority of cyclists do ride on the pavement, but you'll find many, like myself, never do (unless it's a shared cycleway). Like lawyers, it's the majority that make it worse for the minority of us.

15 comments

Have your say






Hotels.com
hotel.info
Travel Supermarket
Expedia.co.uk logo
Venere.com

More ways to enjoy Time Out