Archipelago (15)

Film

Drama

Archipelago_02.jpg_cmyk.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>4/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Mar 1 2011

British director Joanna Hogg’s first film, ‘Unrelated’, was an intimate and sympathetic, but not uncritical, portrait of upper-middle-class folk and their children on a Tuscan holiday, told from the perspective of one of their friends, a woman, who hangs out with teenagers to escape from troubles in the adult world. For her second film, another low-budget work with an air of improvisation to it, Hogg goes back on holiday, but she leaves the sun in Italy and her alter ego at home to portray a fractured family from the inside during a period of discord and dreadful weather. In ‘Archipelago’, the pretty landscapes of Siena give way to the brooding, changing landscapes of a tiny island in the Isles of Scilly.

Patricia (Kate Fahy) and her two children, young adults Edward (Tom Hiddleston) and Cynthia (Lydia Leonard), arrive for a break at a holiday cottage. As rain and wind lash against the windows, Patricia grows exasperated at the absence of her husband, who remains an unheard voice on the phone. Good-natured Edward struggles to hide his angst at where his life is heading and assumes a fatherly role while becoming weirdly familiar with Rose (Amy Lloyd), the family’s hired cook. Cynthia, meanwhile, looms like a dark cloud and snaps and lashes out for no clear reason.

All in all, it’s a very English affair, which is amusing considering that Hogg’s influences are so obviously more broadly European. Characters struggle to say what they mean, or anything at all, and there’s no therapist on hand to lead matters to a neat, inspiring conclusion.Hogg’s second film suggests a director emboldened by her first. She takes risks. Scenes play out in a single take, the camera locked in position, resisting close-ups and giving ‘Archipelago’ an appropriate sense of foreboding and austerity. It also creates space for silences to linger and awkwardness to ferment. There are enough elephants in the room to fill a zoo. If there’s an element of ‘Archipelago’ that doesn’t fully work, it’s the character of a painter (Christopher Baker) who gives the family lessons in his craft. He may remind us of the father’s absence (and absence of warmth, if comments by his kids are accurate) and his musings on art and abstraction may nod to Hogg’s perception of her own work, yet there’s a serene naivety to his delivery that grates and feels condescending when it shouldn’t.

But that’s a quibble. ‘Archipelago’ is a daring new riff on familiar themes. Hogg draws another strong performance from Hiddleston, who plays a very different character from the ballsy recent school leaver in ‘Unrelated’, but again elicits internal screams of horror at his inappropriate relationship with someone outside his gang and over whom he holds
a power he may not perceive. Most of all, ‘Archipelago’ confirms Hogg as a daring and mischievous artist, and a major British talent whose next move will be intriguing.
90

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

15

UK release:

Fri Mar 4 2011

Duration:

100 mins

Cast and crew

Director:

Joanna Hogg

Screenwriter:

Joanna Hogg

Cast:

Tom Hiddleston, Kate Fahy, Amy Lloyd, Christopher Palmer

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (62 ratings)
  • I wish more films in Britain were made in the way this was made, rather similar to the Quartet, Talking To A Stranger, starring Maurice Denham, Judy Dench, Michael Bryant & Margery Mason, also a family at odds with itself. Far from being condescending, I found the Christopher's words extremely moving and full of depth, a quality so rarely found in the present day works of Drama. The was not a note of music nor even available music, and photography was available light, which was so refreshing. The dialogue was so superior to that to be experienced in nearly all televisual Drama of Present times, unlike that in this and War and Peace, with Anthony Hopkins and Alan Dobie which this performance could said to be superb, by any Standards, and as good as the Best that the US Performers have to offer, which latter normally leave the present day British far behind, and much of the Planet. The actors's treatment of the dialogue was as good as any thing I have encountered, and that even includes the very best of the Americans' whose consistency is unique, and makes them the leaders in this ability. The Dramatis Personae were so beautifully well projected to the viewer, and at times it was quite difficult to know whether was an element to the performers input, having been given the script and then changed the wording ad hoc. There seems to me to be nothing I could find to criticise, which is normally my won't. Thus have I ordered the DVD as a consequence. This is how British drama should continue to be, and maybe the Shakespearian Round Theatre has become the fountain out of which a Renaissance in particularly English performance might take the Stage. The people that were represented were not not much Upper Middle, but rather the MIddle Class, which has only beeb taken up by the aspiring. The Upper Middle Class were not so imbued with such profundity.

    ivan Peter james wavell Fri Mar 8
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • I wish more films in Britain were made in the way this was made, rather similar to the Quartet, Talking To A Stranger, starring Maurice Denham, Judy Dench, Michael Bryant & Margery Mason, also a family at odds with itself. Far from being condescending, I found the Christopher's words extremely moving and full of depth, a quality so rarely found in the present day works of Drama. The was not a note of music nor even available music, and photography was available light, which was so refreshing. The dialogue was so superior to that to be experienced in nearly all televisual Drama of Present times, unlike that in this and War and Peace, with Anthony Hopkins and Alan Dobie which this performance could said to be superb, by any Standards, and as good as the Best that the US Performers have to offer, which latter normally leave the present day British far behind, and much of the Planet. The actors's treatment of the dialogue was as good as any thing I have encountered, and that even includes the very best of the Americans' whose consistency is unique, and makes them the leaders in this ability. The Dramatis Personae were so beautifully well projected to the viewer, and at times it was quite difficult to know whether was an element to the performers input, having been given the script and then changed the wording ad hoc. There seems to me to be nothing I could find to criticise, which is normally my won't. Thus have I ordered the DVD as a consequence. This is how British drama should continue to be, and maybe the Shakespearian Round Theatre has become the fountain out of which a Renaissance in particularly English performance might take the Stage. The people that were represented were not not much Upper Middle, but rather the MIddle Class, which has only beeb taken up by the aspiring. The Upper Middle Class were not so imbued with such profundity.

    ivan Peter james wavell Fri Mar 8
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • I wish more films in Britain were made in the way this was made, rather similar to the Quartet, Talking To A Stranger, starring Maurice Denham, Judy Dench, Michael Bryant & Margery Mason, also a family at odds with itself. Far from being condescending, I found the Christopher's words extremely moving and full of depth, a quality so rarely found in the present day works of Drama. The was not a note of music nor even available music, and photography was available light, which was so refreshing. The dialogue was so superior to that to be experienced in nearly all televisual Drama of Present times, unlike that in this and War and Peace, with Anthony Hopkins and Alan Dobie which this performance could said to be superb, by any Standards, and as good as the Best that the US Performers have to offer, which latter normally leave the present day British far behind, and much of the Planet. The actors's treatment of the dialogue was as good as any thing I have encountered, and that even includes the very best of the Americans' whose consistency is unique, and makes them the leaders in this ability. The Dramatis Personae were so beautifully well projected to the viewer, and at times it was quite difficult to know whether was an element to the performers input, having been given the script and then changed the wording ad hoc. There seems to me to be nothing I could find to criticise, which is normally my won't. Thus have I ordered the DVD as a consequence. This is how British drama should continue to be, and maybe the Shakespearian Round Theatre has become the fountain out of which a Renaissance in particularly English performance might take the Stage. The people that were represented were not not much Upper Middle, but rather the MIddle Class, which has only beeb taken up by the aspiring. The Upper Middle Class were not so imbued with profundity.

    ivan Peter james wavell Fri Mar 8
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • To be fair, it is not a clear-cut category winner: it is a close run thing with this "Garfield" and "mr Popper's Penguins" for worst film ever.

    David Allan Sun Sep 23 2012
    Report
  • The worst film ever made

    peter Sat Sep 22 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • The worst film I have seen . Worst film ever made

    peter Sat Sep 22 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • I THAY THIS GUINEA FOWL IS NOT O.G.!

    Ice T Sat Sep 15 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Currently looking at film and really like.. I feel I am getting some empathy!...as my family is full of angst angry emotions and I ain't from a rich family... I do feel for the cook! Why is she socialising solo much with them.. I do find it very amusing also because I relate to the tensions going on ... Ode to the family... What can you say.

    Cate Fri Sep 14 2012
    Report
  • ...and many stupid people who see substance in thin air!

    Adrian Fri Aug 17 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • People who find this film boring are a)not using their imagination and b) probably corrupted by the artificial tricks used in reality TV to create drama. The director uses great subltety in pointing us towards the inner emotions of a family undergoing a shift in its dynamics caused by the imminent departure of the son/brother to a dangerous location for a long period. Cynthia the daughter is the eldest who feels she must organize everything. She wants to give her brother a good send-off but childish emothions overcome her.She is furious with Edward for going off and leaving her to cope with the parental break-up. She is upset by the ending of the childhood closeness and safety and jealous of outsiders and because she is annoyed that her need for mothering is being put aside to console her mother she endw up being the one to upwet her. The mother feels abandoned by her husband and now son but is finding solace in art. Edward himself is too nice and makes things worse for the women by his own difficulty in taking charge of his life and leaving the nest. Rose is a simply masterly portrayal of the changing roles between those who serve us and 'servants'. I loved the way she thoughtfully put away the knives - the tensions were over and the family had adfusted itself. She was not sure what had been going on but she had survived! On to the next job.

    Bron Grillo Sat Mar 31 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star