Argo

Film

Drama

Argo.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>4/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Wed Oct 17 2012

It’s a little-known fact that Ben Affleck – celebrity totty, tabloid bait and esteemed filmmaker – has a degree in Middle Eastern affairs from the University of Vermont. It’s a qualification he puts to good use in ‘Argo’, a nail-biting thriller based (fairly loosely) on real events which, for the majority of its length, manages to avoid the expected Hollywood clichés about the Middle East and promote a balanced view of America’s dealings with that troubled region.

It’s 1979, and after the fall of the Shah supporters of the new Islamic rulers of Iran have laid siege to the US embassy, demanding the return of their former leader for trial. But six embassy employees have escaped, and are hiding out in the home of the Canadian ambassador. Enter Tony Mendez (Affleck) a CIA exfiltration expert with a crafty if bizarre plan: posing as a film producer – complete with sci-fi script, production sketches and an ad in Variety – he’ll smuggle the six back to safety.

For 100 minutes, ‘Argo’ is close to flawless. Unashamedly modelling his directorial style on the stark, serious ’70s thrillers of Alan J Pakula and Sidney Lumet, Affleck cranks up the tension expertly. The script is witty and insightful, contrasting US and Iranian popular reactions to  the crisis: it’s ‘Death to America’ versus  ‘Ayatollah Assaholla’. There’s not enough attention paid to character development – Mendez, in particular, never comes into sharp focus – but that was true in the Pakula/Lumet films, too, and it’s mitigated by a superb cast, notably Alan Arkin as an irascible Hollywood old-hand.

But the film’s most abiding pleasure lies in the period detail: using multiple film stocks and reportedly blowing up some of the 35mm footage for a grainier texture, Affleck achieves the look, feel, and almost smell of the late 1970s. From the opening, old-school Warner Bros logo – snatched from a crackly ’70s print – to the closing montage of real photos of the hostages, there’s a commitment to minutiae which enriches the experience beyond measure.

So it’s a shame that Affleck bottles it in the home stretch, bowing to the demands of the multiplex to offer a frankly idiotic action-packed climax, and ending on a note of odious sentimentality. It’s almost enough to erase what’s gone before – but that would be to undervalue the remarkable skill, intelligence and craft that have gone into this oh-so-nearly brilliant political potboiler.

35

Comments

Add +

Release details

UK release:

Wed Nov 7 2012

Cast and crew

Director:

Ben Affleck

Cast:

Ben Affleck, Bryan Cranston, John Goodman

Screenwriter:

Chris Terrio, Joshuah Bearman

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (24 ratings)
  • Thought I'd have a third vote! Changed my score again ;-D

    John o Sullivan Sun Nov 25 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Another pompous film. Starts out sober and didactic with what purports to be a history lesson and has a promising first half-hour. Then it runs out of story and gets progressively more uninteresting till its pumped-up artificiality puts it on a level with the b-movie schlock it mocks. Heroic rogue CIA agent single-handedly saves whimpering bureaucrat Yanks from murderous Muslim army. The blaring finish of checkpoints, chases and shouting is grindingly dull. Leave before the hugs and high fives. A bore.

    Phil Ince Sun Nov 25 2012
    Report
  • Interesting, fluid mix of drama, thriller, history and (in the Hollywood segments) comedy.

    critique Fri Nov 23 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • my rating!

    Pollo Fri Nov 23 2012
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • This. Up until the last few minutes it is ridiculously tense and slick, an incredible story credibly told. But all the way home there was a bad taste in the mouth from the jingoism and self-congratulation that lay oddly with the beginning - where the political context is cleverly and efficiently explained through graphic novel means

    Pollo Fri Nov 23 2012
    Report
  • Oddly enough, I agree with most of the 'user review' comments here, both good and bad: Argo is a well made film with great screencraft. Affleck can direct, there is lots of atmosphere and period detail. I found it gripping. There are some good performances, some less so. Character development is limited, The ending is cliche. So far it's nudging up towards a 4star rating! But this is not a story that needed to be told. If Affleck wanted to do a credible piece on the CIA in Iran, there's decades of their support for the Shar and his death squads to draw on. So why this? The first half was great, until the distasteful political subtext put me off.

    Simple Simon Thu Nov 22 2012
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • blimey scrumpyjack agrees with me ... wheres the prozac ?

    john o sullivan Thu Nov 22 2012
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Excellent. LOVED the 70's/80's WB logo touch too. 8/10

    scrumpyjack Thu Nov 22 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • Any film that dramatises historic events has a context. Where those events are so harrowing and important as The Iranian Revolution, there is a clear responsibility on the film maker to treat 'history' with a certain amount of respect. There is of course a balance to be struck between storytelling and factual accuracy. . Two films that have pulled this off extremely well are 'The Kite Runner' and 'The Last King of Scotland'; where artistic license is used to tell a 'greater truth' about the human condition, without distorting key elements of history, or our understanding of what transpired. . The greater truth behind 'Argo' is that we only know the CIA role in events portrayed because they have chosen to declassify it for PR purposes. Although well directed and shot, I'm comfortably sure it would not have been commissioned/ funded but for the propaganda value: to show the Iranians in a bad light and the clever American CIA in a good one (wave flag). We learn nothing about ourselves. The 'lie well told' here seems for the sake of propaganda rather than art.

    Numpty Tue Nov 20 2012
    Report
  • To enjoy this work one must view it as a film not a documentary. It's drama. It's fiction based on fact.It's a lie well-told. It certainly sustains the viewer's attention. It's hardly boring. Well-structured story, very well acted and cleverly written. Maybe not to everyone's taste but if you read the reviews, watch the trailer you'll have a good idea if you're likely to enjoy it. It's not the best film of the year but it is certainly very good and well worth a visit to the cinema.

    NILES CRANE Thu Nov 15 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star