Atonement (15)

Film

War films

migrate.31475.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>4/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Sep 4 2007

The first hour of ‘Atonement’ is an electric experience, during which one feels that Joe Wright (‘Pride and Prejudice’), the film’s young director, and Christopher Hampton, its screenwriter, have a clever grip on the potential of Ian McEwan’s novel to inspire more than just a well-crafted adaptation and a lyrical, intelligent film in its own right. McEwan’s book is about the telling of stories, about the perception of others’ tales and about delivering a lie to a rapt, conditioned audience for reasons of self-preservation: a key character even pleads to be believed with the defence that she saw something happening, ‘With my own eyes’. What greater appeal is there to the potential ability of cinema to twist, mould and convince us?

Wright tightly harnesses these ideas in the first, and longest, of the film’s three chapters. We’re in a smart country house in the late 1930s, just a few years before the war. Cecilia (Keira Knightley) has recently come down from Cambridge; Robbie (James McAvoy), her university contemporary and son of her parents’ housekeeper is dabbling with landscape gardening; and her brother Leon (Patrick Kennedy) is coming to dinner with a friend, the arrogant industrialist Paul Marshall (Benedict Cumberbatch). The performances are enjoyable and spot-on: Cecilia’s brittle beauty; Robbie’s educated but tempered confidence; the wily camaraderie between Leon and Marshall.

There’s clearly an attraction between Robbie and Cecilia, yet his connection with the servile classes and her inherited snobbery is holding Cecilia at bay. The class divide persists when Cecilia’s sensible 13-year-old sister, Briony (a terrific turn from Saoirse Ronan) – already dabbling in writing and staging plays at home – constructs her own, deluded fiction around the goings-on between Robbie and Cecilia that see Robbie falsely branded a ‘sex maniac’ and rapist. As with the coming of war to Brideshead, the spell is broken, the Second World War begins and Briony, later as a young adult (Romola Garai) and, much later, as a dying novelist (Vanessa Redgrave) recalls the errors of her youth.

Far from ‘unfilmable’, as some have described it, McEwan’s book offers real opportunities for a filmmaker to thread the perils of storytelling into an epic narrative that bursts out of the attractive claustrophobia of a rarefied world and onto the ravaged, classless beaches of Dunkirk and the fortified streets of London as Cecilia and Briony both, separately, work as nurses during the war and try to deal with their recent past. For the country-house scenes, Wright wisely makes us complicit with Briony’s perception of events, yet such is the strength of the director’s tactics in this chapter – repeated scenes, messing with time, the sound of a typewriter doing its damage on the soundtrack – that when he loosens his approach for a more traditional telling of the narrative for the rest of the film, one can’t help but be disappointed.

Compared to these earlier episodes, the film’s later scenes are more pedestrian and Wright becomes more prone to visual swaggery: a technically impressive but artistically questionable five-minute tracking shot of the carnage at Dunkirk; the nurses marching in formation around a hospital as lights go off above them one-by-one; the rush of water through a tube station as a character drowns – all these grate as one feels that Wright, rather than tackling the pitfalls of storytelling instead succumbs to its audience-pleasing thrills.

A noble, well-made, superbly performed and photographed (by Seamus McGarvey) semi-failure then, but still one that shows Wright to be one of the more imaginative filmmakers of his generation, capable of winning over large audiences with daring endeavours.

99+

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

15

UK release:

Fri Sep 7 2007

Duration:

123 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 4/5 (87 ratings)
  • FILM WAS FANTASTIC.DEFINATELY A MUST SEE BY ALL...NOT JUST A CHICK FLICK!!!

    LYNDSEY Wed Sep 26 2007
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Really loved the movie - was a bit unsure at the beginning but soon slipped into the feel of the tale. A must see for all

    Caz Wed Sep 26 2007
    Report
  • A brilliant film !! Has there ever been a film about the commandment that says. "You should not bear false witness" then this is it. Sister against sister but how many people in their lives inhibit true love and stop others through jealously and wanting someone for themselves. Extremely enjoyable film but at the end Bryony wishes for Atonement but fiction and wishful thinking can not change fact. Best filem I have seen this year.

    Cecile Wed Sep 26 2007
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • It's definitely a girly movie... but I didn't like at all!! I won't say it's crap, but I would definitely not see it again. I liked however the way the movie ended, otherwise I would describe it as tooo sad & sometimes boring...

    Ramez Wed Sep 26 2007
    Report
  • It has to be one of the great ironies that nobody commenting on this film understands what is meant by atonement. Has nobody ever found themselves accused of something they had not done because of lies told by someone else? How can Briony EVER atone for the consequences of her lie? Her actions destroy a love that had only minutes before been acknowledged, and the reason the ending seems so inadequate to many reviewers is exactly the point - even at the end Briony turns her guilt into fiction rather than write the truth. The so-called boring Dunkirk sequence is widely seen as dragging out the story, but Robbie's walk to the beach is noble as he is slowly dying of septicaemia from a wound, and whilst his motivation may be to get back to Cecilia, his comrades consider him selfless is saving them. This may be contrasted with the selfishness of Briony in never telling the truth till she herself is dying sixty years later. Nothing Briony does can ever be seen as real atonement.

    Stephen C Tue Sep 25 2007
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Am I an outsider loser or is this film just pretentious crap? The film makers have missed any emotinal connection with the characters and as a result I just didn't care. They have sterilised the book.

    John Box Mon Sep 24 2007
    Report
  • Having read the book, I doubted any film could honestly depict McEwan's exploration of the responsibilities in creating a work of fiction and still tell a cinematic tale. I think the brilliant use of sound, starting with the distant taps of a typewriter coming out of the opening darkness, convey this sense of the creative process. All the following sounds, the trapped bee, the dripping taps, the snapping electrics on the Underground, act as a 'leitmotif' for this, elegantly presaging the elderly Briony's moving speech at the close. This may be glossy, prestige cinema, but it's also thoughtful, elegant, and, especially in that incredible tracking shot at Dunkirk, superbly constructed cinema.

    tim Sun Sep 23 2007
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • absolutely the worst film i have ever seen. appaling.

    dantheman Sun Sep 23 2007
    Report
  • A thought provoking and classic tale. Making the ordinary folk of WW2 more real for me than before. I loved the suspence and the way the story moves about before the dramatic climax of the separation. After that I loved the twists and turns and moved with the characters to the sombre finale. I'm going again to see more. Might even read the book too.

    E Dashwood Sun Sep 23 2007
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • I saw it, and loved it. I hadn't read the book, I didn't really know what it would be about. It moved me to tears and i would definitely watch it again. Please, does anyone know which beautiful house was used as the family home?

    Lyn Sat Sep 22 2007
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star