Avatar (12A)

Film

Fantasy films

Avatar 2.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>2/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Dec 15 2009

There’s a line from ‘Jurassic Park’ that echoed hauntingly through this critic’s head as ‘Avatar’ unfolded: ‘Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.’ James Cameron is one of those scientists: so in love with the technology, with the possibilities, that he never pauses to reflect upon the practicalities of cinema, of storytelling, of connecting with an audience.

That quote is doubly relevant when one considers the cultural similarities between these two blockbusters, both of which justified massive expense by promising a quantum leap forward in visual effects. But where Spielberg utilised technology in the service of a tight, witty script, Cameron is simply out to astound. There are moments when you almost expect Sam Worthington’s moody, ever-present voiceover to be replaced by the self-styled king of the world yelling at his audience: ‘Are you awestruck now? How about now? Now?’

When his scientist brother is killed a week before shipping out to the distant planet Pandora, wheelchair-bound US Marine Jake Sully (Worthington) is offered the chance to go in his place. On Pandora, Jake meets his avatar, a remote-controlled host body generated from his brother’s DNA and designed to blend in among the native Na’vi, a race of nine-foot blue hunter-gatherers living in peaceful harmony with their homeworld, Native American style.

Or rather, Native Californian: Na’vi civilisation is a mishmash of half-formed Hollywood ideas about the supposed superiority of ‘primitive’ cultures, tossing around buzzwords like ‘spirit’ and ‘energy’ without ever approaching a cohesive set of beliefs. But ‘all this tree-hugging shit’, as Jake describes it, is only the most obvious defect in Cameron’s dire, cliché-ridden script. From the bluntly expositional nature of the early scenes to the gung-ho, sub-‘Aliens’ banter of Jake’s fellow soldiers, this is screenwriting on autopilot, cobbling together unripe ideas without a scrap of originality or emotional resonance.

It’s hard to fault ‘Avatar’ as an immersive visual experience. Pandora and its luridly coloured inhabitants are beautifully designed, though none of this ever feels remotely real. But this was supposed to be the movie that changed the face of filmmaking forever. Ultimately, Cameron’s signature achievement may have been to prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, the oldest of all Hollywood maxims: all the money in the world is no subsitute for fresh ideas and a solid script.
99+

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

12A

UK release:

Thu Dec 17 2009

Duration:

161 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (355 ratings)
  • It has really intrigued me, sittin gback reading over the last couple of days....the amount of reaction that this film has provoked!!!!It just continues to convince me that this is the most vital/relevant piece of cinema in the last 20 years,Yet still there are an odd few of you on here saying smart little anti hollywood/anti america/anti cameron/anti capitilist/anti FUN soundbites!!!!! & slogans..Ridicule along with congratulations truly is one of the sincerest forms of flattery.more people have an opinion on this film than any I have seen since the early 80s..and of all the varied people I meet(and I work very near to a 15 screen multiplex) around 90/95% love it!!!! well done J.C.

    scotty Sat Jan 9 2010
    Report
  • Trip e for the masses! Not only would I like my ticket money back, I'd like the $3 they charged me for the stupid glasses, which gave me a headache by the way... or was it the stupid pantheistic anti-capitalist crappy plot that gave me the headache?

    Wayne S Fri Jan 8 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • the film was supertop. Tom Huddleston has not a strong grasp with his critque because ideas around originality are flawed. Tom Huddleston's machine like western greedy selfish voice ignores the fact everything is reused in art. "kfffffffffff."

    davidfloat Fri Jan 8 2010
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • I absolutely LOVED this film! I saw it in 3D Imax which would have made it more incredible, but I actually can't see why so many people don't like it. It is pure escapism and yeah, maybe the plot isn't some complicated, overly twisted storyline, but I liked that. And the special effects really are something. If you haven't seen this film, don't listen to what other people say, just see it for yourself. 5 stars. I want to go to Pandora!!! =D

    Kate Fri Jan 8 2010
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Twee, good effects which held attention, leaden dialogue, 2 dimensional characters, formulaic

    TJK Thu Jan 7 2010
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • NARGOS YOU THE MAN! glad to find someone in total agreement with me about avatar vs miyazaki.......nausica is also similar....and yes much more charming! nice one

    christian Thu Jan 7 2010
    Report
  • I think in Steven, see below, James Cameron night have found a collaborator for his next screenplay. Does anything he said make sense? What a bunch of hooie! Getting back to the film... on second thought, I'd rather not. Going to see "The Fantastic Mr. Fox" instead.

    wayne S Thu Jan 7 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Watch Princess Mononoke - It deservedly ranks among the masterpieces of the medium, and in my opinion of cinema in general. It is a serious--yet beautiful--allegorical tale that doesn't take any easy ways out and paints a more complicated picture than movies that try many times harder than it apparently does. Unlike most "man versus nature" stories, the comforting black and white answers that make things easy are nowhere to be found. It is also, as expected, a visual feast, though instead of the breathtaking flight sequences of most of Miyazaki's films the visual treats consist of beautifully realistic natural settings and sharp, gritty action.

    Nargos Thu Jan 7 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Movie Review : A Mission to find Our Own Trueself. We are like a baby if we don’t know where we live in, what are the elements that supports human life. Do we treasure it. Do we know what we are doing now exactly? There are three main groups in this world, *Those who study the nature, to maintain the nature. *Those who make profit out of the nature, make use of those who don’t know anything. *Those who don’t know anything and ignore everything about nature. Everyone of us could be anything if we learn it patiently, smart, even at times might sacrifice something. But do we know what we really want, need and our responsibilities? Now, which groups are we belong to? Which group is having the majority numbers now at this moment? The movie emphasizes connection with the bird, horse, trees, tribes, natures. Did Eywa really fight back? As human, who take our country or homeland, we would probably think of fighting back. As animal, being attack, would probably protect themselves by making their territory. As plant, being attack, would probably try to stay alive if there is water and sun. As earth, being attack, would you know how does it fight back? *As earth fight back, that will be the day of the connection between bird, horse, trees, tribes, natures has been broken seriously. * Do we look like part of the biological link then? What is our effort so far? The Question again: Are we still a “babyâ€�? Knowing “NOTHINGâ€� about ourself?

    Steven Thu Jan 7 2010
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • The worst film have seen in a long time, bored me senseless - we walked out after an hour of the usual hollywood cheesy dribble. Could have spent a bit less on the effects and actually looked into having a plot instead. Utter rubbish.

    chris h Thu Jan 7 2010
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
  31. 31
  32. 32
  33. 33
  34. 34
  35. 35
  36. 36
  37. 37
  38. 38
  39. 39
  40. 40
  41. 41
  42. 42
  43. 43
  44. 44
  45. 45
  46. 46
  47. 47
  48. 48
  49. 49
  50. 50
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star