Avatar (12A)

Film

Fantasy films

Avatar 2.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>2/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Dec 15 2009

There’s a line from ‘Jurassic Park’ that echoed hauntingly through this critic’s head as ‘Avatar’ unfolded: ‘Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.’ James Cameron is one of those scientists: so in love with the technology, with the possibilities, that he never pauses to reflect upon the practicalities of cinema, of storytelling, of connecting with an audience.

That quote is doubly relevant when one considers the cultural similarities between these two blockbusters, both of which justified massive expense by promising a quantum leap forward in visual effects. But where Spielberg utilised technology in the service of a tight, witty script, Cameron is simply out to astound. There are moments when you almost expect Sam Worthington’s moody, ever-present voiceover to be replaced by the self-styled king of the world yelling at his audience: ‘Are you awestruck now? How about now? Now?’

When his scientist brother is killed a week before shipping out to the distant planet Pandora, wheelchair-bound US Marine Jake Sully (Worthington) is offered the chance to go in his place. On Pandora, Jake meets his avatar, a remote-controlled host body generated from his brother’s DNA and designed to blend in among the native Na’vi, a race of nine-foot blue hunter-gatherers living in peaceful harmony with their homeworld, Native American style.

Or rather, Native Californian: Na’vi civilisation is a mishmash of half-formed Hollywood ideas about the supposed superiority of ‘primitive’ cultures, tossing around buzzwords like ‘spirit’ and ‘energy’ without ever approaching a cohesive set of beliefs. But ‘all this tree-hugging shit’, as Jake describes it, is only the most obvious defect in Cameron’s dire, cliché-ridden script. From the bluntly expositional nature of the early scenes to the gung-ho, sub-‘Aliens’ banter of Jake’s fellow soldiers, this is screenwriting on autopilot, cobbling together unripe ideas without a scrap of originality or emotional resonance.

It’s hard to fault ‘Avatar’ as an immersive visual experience. Pandora and its luridly coloured inhabitants are beautifully designed, though none of this ever feels remotely real. But this was supposed to be the movie that changed the face of filmmaking forever. Ultimately, Cameron’s signature achievement may have been to prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, the oldest of all Hollywood maxims: all the money in the world is no subsitute for fresh ideas and a solid script.
99+

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

12A

UK release:

Thu Dec 17 2009

Duration:

161 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (355 ratings)
  • Uh, Drew, weren't you just beating me with the same stick? But I accept your apology. Enjoy the movie; I'm moving on.

    Wayne S Mon Jan 18 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • missy k don't beat me with the grammar stick; what's wrong with: the four, eight-feet Na'vi have eight foot?

    drew Mon Jan 18 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • The four, eight-foot tall Na'vi, have eight feet. Drew please repeat a 1000 times, naughty boy.

    missy k Mon Jan 18 2010
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • AVATAR IS A SIMPLY GLORIOUS FEAT - OF A GORGEOUS CINEMATIC FETE-

    miles Mon Jan 18 2010
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • I don't think that a film with such breathtaking effects and beauty needs a multi-layered and complex plot which might distract from the visuals. The storyline of Avatar was a simple good vs. evil hero/love story with some drama to balance the fun - it was fairly predictable with no surprises and no major twists but there also were no disappointments nor any obvious plot holes that I can think of. The story made me feel happy which is a good thing and I loved the length of the film which gave me more time to be amazed by the scenery, effects and the sheer brilliance of the people who managed to create such a visually stunning world and make it feel real but at the same time unreal - just as an alien world should feel. I will go to see it again just to enjoy the spectacle and to re-live the moments and the beauty once more.

    Mika Mon Jan 18 2010
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • To my friend Drew: For some reason we use the "zero plural" when the measurement is a pre-noun modifier (pre-noun) as in "a four-foot wall," a "six-inch ruler," or "an eight-foot tree worshipper." Authority: "A Grammar of Contemporary English Usage" by Randolph Quirk, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartik, Longman Group, London, 1978. I rest my case, and if I may include a bit of American usage... "Avatar sucks."

    Wayne S Mon Jan 18 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Eight is plural, eight FEET tall,That`s FEET Wayne!Not eight foot.Get an education! Then your opinion will count.

    Drew Sun Jan 17 2010
    Report
  • was looking for a film to go an watch then in the corner of my eye i saw that AVATAR had only been rated a 1 star. well let me tell you that all these people who gave it a crap rating are sad people who cant be pleased and enjoy a good moan. i dont normally get excited or even watch films like this but it WAS AMaZING!!!!!! it was more then just a film it was an experience all the way through i was going wow... and when it finished i felt sad as the story line had got me so engaged i actually felt i was one of those blue people. lol

    holly Sun Jan 17 2010
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • "Video game," it's a metaphor. Sorry you didn't understand. Smurfs are for Saturday morning TV. Making them 3-dimensional, eight foot tall tree worshipers who hate ex-Marines doesn't make them deep; it makes them silly.

    Wayne S Sun Jan 17 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • I went to see this film 4 weeks after release for a reason.It usually takes that long for the re-actions and over crytical under/over hyped opinions of various viewers....What a dissapointment!!!!!!!!!! THAT SO MANY IDIOTS(BUT ESPECIALLY WAYNE S) DONT LIKE THIS.! How could you not? are you breathig? whats all this video game bol**x I keep reading??? it was not a video game! where was the joypad/disc/console...... Come on!!! stay away from the movies if you do not like good films,and get off this review.. WITHOUT DOUBT TEN OUT OF TEN! THIS IS HOW MOVIES SHOULD BE,AND AS IS BLATANTLY OBVOIUS (although some of you muppets dont realise) ITS HOW THE FUTURE OF CINEMA LOOKS!!!

    drew Sun Jan 17 2010
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
  31. 31
  32. 32
  33. 33
  34. 34
  35. 35
  36. 36
  37. 37
  38. 38
  39. 39
  40. 40
  41. 41
  42. 42
  43. 43
  44. 44
  45. 45
  46. 46
  47. 47
  48. 48
  49. 49
  50. 50
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star