Avatar (12A)

Film

Fantasy films

Avatar 2.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>2/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Dec 15 2009

There’s a line from ‘Jurassic Park’ that echoed hauntingly through this critic’s head as ‘Avatar’ unfolded: ‘Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.’ James Cameron is one of those scientists: so in love with the technology, with the possibilities, that he never pauses to reflect upon the practicalities of cinema, of storytelling, of connecting with an audience.

That quote is doubly relevant when one considers the cultural similarities between these two blockbusters, both of which justified massive expense by promising a quantum leap forward in visual effects. But where Spielberg utilised technology in the service of a tight, witty script, Cameron is simply out to astound. There are moments when you almost expect Sam Worthington’s moody, ever-present voiceover to be replaced by the self-styled king of the world yelling at his audience: ‘Are you awestruck now? How about now? Now?’

When his scientist brother is killed a week before shipping out to the distant planet Pandora, wheelchair-bound US Marine Jake Sully (Worthington) is offered the chance to go in his place. On Pandora, Jake meets his avatar, a remote-controlled host body generated from his brother’s DNA and designed to blend in among the native Na’vi, a race of nine-foot blue hunter-gatherers living in peaceful harmony with their homeworld, Native American style.

Or rather, Native Californian: Na’vi civilisation is a mishmash of half-formed Hollywood ideas about the supposed superiority of ‘primitive’ cultures, tossing around buzzwords like ‘spirit’ and ‘energy’ without ever approaching a cohesive set of beliefs. But ‘all this tree-hugging shit’, as Jake describes it, is only the most obvious defect in Cameron’s dire, cliché-ridden script. From the bluntly expositional nature of the early scenes to the gung-ho, sub-‘Aliens’ banter of Jake’s fellow soldiers, this is screenwriting on autopilot, cobbling together unripe ideas without a scrap of originality or emotional resonance.

It’s hard to fault ‘Avatar’ as an immersive visual experience. Pandora and its luridly coloured inhabitants are beautifully designed, though none of this ever feels remotely real. But this was supposed to be the movie that changed the face of filmmaking forever. Ultimately, Cameron’s signature achievement may have been to prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, the oldest of all Hollywood maxims: all the money in the world is no subsitute for fresh ideas and a solid script.
99+

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

12A

UK release:

Thu Dec 17 2009

Duration:

161 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (355 ratings)
  • I think this movie is good for sociologists and psychologists who can now find out exactly how infantile the general public really is.

    Robert Mon Dec 21 2009
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • this is a movie for numbing our kids brains..

    hud Mon Dec 21 2009
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • I agree with this review. The "noble savage" is a myth perpetuated by new agers and other silly people The twin brother was merely a lame plot decise. It could have become a real interal part of Jake's psychology and would have conbtributed to the all ready explicit themes of identity and doubling. Alas, James Cameron doesn't seem to be intellectual enough to understand the themes his own writing is exploring. There wer eother plot devises such as the strange mineral that we have no idea why the evil people want it. Yes, it is worth a lot of money, but why is it worth so much? What does it do? The script was predictable, the action scenes were repetitive. The characters were flatter than flat. The "philosophy" was simplistic . The score was old and obvious. The whole film was merely a garbage dump of Romantic cliches.

    blair Mon Dec 21 2009
    Report
  • As the love scene got underway, I found myself really anticipating what should have been a genuinely touching detail: Sully and the Navi girl intertwining their ponytail fringes (the ones used to bond with flying creatures & trees). When that DIDN'T happen, the film lost me for good. It was such an obvious touch, yet overlooked by James Cameron. After that, I became much more attuned to the films many plot flaws.

    ralph Mon Dec 21 2009
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Personally, I thought it was fantastic, as did the rest of my family, but that's just my opinion.

    A.G Sun Dec 20 2009
    Report
  • If you want a sophisticated plot with subtly drawn characters then this film isn't for you. This is a movie in which the bad guys are bad and the good, good. It's a straightforward, powerful and urgent story set in a world of simply unparalleled and never-before-seen visual richness. Totally absorbing and utterly amazing.

    clive369 Sun Dec 20 2009
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • wow, this film was amazing!

    Adam Sun Dec 20 2009
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • I waited in hushed anticipation for years to see this film. Although the visuals were 3D, the script could not even manage 1D and for Cameron insulting my intelligence and dumbing the whole thing down to the level of a poor computer game, 0D. Shame.

    Arpo Sun Dec 20 2009
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • My comments weren't directed at the film itself but rather at its subliminal message. I suppose I should be more obvious about that, for the sake of those inclined to militantly defend mindless entertainment (and whose arsenal is, not surprisingly, limited to ad hominem attacks).

    Iseeyou Sun Dec 20 2009
    Report
  • Well Clara, this movie is just perfect for you then :)

    Max Sun Dec 20 2009
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
  31. 31
  32. 32
  33. 33
  34. 34
  35. 35
  36. 36
  37. 37
  38. 38
  39. 39
  40. 40
  41. 41
  42. 42
  43. 43
  44. 44
  45. 45
  46. 46
  47. 47
  48. 48
  49. 49
  50. 50
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star