Avatar (12A)

Film

Fantasy films

Avatar 2.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>2/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Dec 15 2009

There’s a line from ‘Jurassic Park’ that echoed hauntingly through this critic’s head as ‘Avatar’ unfolded: ‘Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.’ James Cameron is one of those scientists: so in love with the technology, with the possibilities, that he never pauses to reflect upon the practicalities of cinema, of storytelling, of connecting with an audience.

That quote is doubly relevant when one considers the cultural similarities between these two blockbusters, both of which justified massive expense by promising a quantum leap forward in visual effects. But where Spielberg utilised technology in the service of a tight, witty script, Cameron is simply out to astound. There are moments when you almost expect Sam Worthington’s moody, ever-present voiceover to be replaced by the self-styled king of the world yelling at his audience: ‘Are you awestruck now? How about now? Now?’

When his scientist brother is killed a week before shipping out to the distant planet Pandora, wheelchair-bound US Marine Jake Sully (Worthington) is offered the chance to go in his place. On Pandora, Jake meets his avatar, a remote-controlled host body generated from his brother’s DNA and designed to blend in among the native Na’vi, a race of nine-foot blue hunter-gatherers living in peaceful harmony with their homeworld, Native American style.

Or rather, Native Californian: Na’vi civilisation is a mishmash of half-formed Hollywood ideas about the supposed superiority of ‘primitive’ cultures, tossing around buzzwords like ‘spirit’ and ‘energy’ without ever approaching a cohesive set of beliefs. But ‘all this tree-hugging shit’, as Jake describes it, is only the most obvious defect in Cameron’s dire, cliché-ridden script. From the bluntly expositional nature of the early scenes to the gung-ho, sub-‘Aliens’ banter of Jake’s fellow soldiers, this is screenwriting on autopilot, cobbling together unripe ideas without a scrap of originality or emotional resonance.

It’s hard to fault ‘Avatar’ as an immersive visual experience. Pandora and its luridly coloured inhabitants are beautifully designed, though none of this ever feels remotely real. But this was supposed to be the movie that changed the face of filmmaking forever. Ultimately, Cameron’s signature achievement may have been to prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, the oldest of all Hollywood maxims: all the money in the world is no subsitute for fresh ideas and a solid script.
99+

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

12A

UK release:

Thu Dec 17 2009

Duration:

161 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (355 ratings)
  • I don't really like that kind of films but decided to watch it as it was the most expensive film ever. I was really surprised as I loved it!!!! Anazing!!!!

    Maggie Mon Jan 25 2010
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • From the vivid imagination of David... I mean James, Callahan, comes a fantasty world in which evil coprs employ the US army to slaughter indeginious peoples for their resources. Dire script and did someone say cliche, and the Jungle of Much 3D Wonderment and a Busy 600-Piece Orchestra quickly irritates. The local gooks are blue, and interestingly they win. What is News Corp thinking of?

    Damion Mon Jan 25 2010
    Report
  • Came back around to see if the Avatar comment line was still going on and on. It is. I've been a detractor in general, admiring the visual achievement while thinking it could have been so much better with a storyline that didn't incorporate every liberal cliche and diversity lecture thrown at us for the past twenty years. That's why I think you've got it wrong Peter M; it's the lentil munchers who are eating this mess with spoon. I prefer chili-mac with a dash of pepper, thank you.

    Wayne S Sun Jan 24 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Why has this film taken so much abuse? I can only guess that the more cultured amongst us are the more vocal? Maybe. Anyway I went to see this expecting the worst and have to say that, as a cinematic experience, this is the best film I have seen in a very, very long time. Let this be a lesson to you; permit the Guardian and Time Out lentil munchers to have their vitriolic comment but take it with a large pinch of salt. A very large pinch!

    peter m Sun Jan 24 2010
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • apparently cost about $300m to make, of which $20 went on the script (including photocopying) - embarrasingly bad - gets two stars for visual effects - but, oh dear, was there a cliche left out ?

    deckard Sun Jan 24 2010
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Just amazing, I watched it a month ago and I am still speechless, cant believe time out rating is so low!! unexplainable!

    Andrea Sun Jan 24 2010
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • i think its awsome the movie

    Dark Angel Sun Jan 24 2010
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • Am not sure why this film is being panned so viciously by so many, it is a visual spectacle of incredible creativity and imagination, but more than that, it is the story behind the visuals that give this movie a 5* in my book. I am not sure how other reviewers can miss the environmental warnings contained in this marvellous vehicle but maybe it's proof that most of the human race are so preoccupied with themselves and personal gain and greed that the bigger picture is lost - the end of mankind is nearer than we may realize if so many are so out of tune with anything other than their own greed. Go and see for yourselves and listen to the message conveyed by the story while revelling in the fantastic visual effects!

    Jules(not Verne) Sun Jan 24 2010
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Yes well The Sun is the best-selling paper in the UK and the X Factor the most popular show-doesn't mean they are actually any good, they just appeal to the lowest common denominator-ditto Avatar.

    Richard Kiddle Sun Jan 24 2010
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • And as Stephen Colbert pointed out, this film is the highest grossing film of all time: "The market has spoken!"

    jeremykyle Sun Jan 24 2010
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
  31. 31
  32. 32
  33. 33
  34. 34
  35. 35
  36. 36
  37. 37
  38. 38
  39. 39
  40. 40
  41. 41
  42. 42
  43. 43
  44. 44
  45. 45
  46. 46
  47. 47
  48. 48
  49. 49
  50. 50
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star