Blindness (18)

Film

Fantasy films

679.x600.film.blindness.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>2/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>2/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Nov 18 2008

Despite its evident honesty, horrific visceral impact and its emergent moral and political idealism, this adaptation of Nobel Prize-winning Portuguese writer José Saramago’s eponymous allegorical novel must be considered a misfire from Fernando Meirelles, the Brazilian director of ‘City of God’ and ‘The Constant Gardener’.

Of a mixed North and Latin American cast, Julianne Moore (right) and Mark Ruffalo play the leads, as an opthalmologist and his wife who are first on the scene when an unexplained pandemic of blindness breaks out in an unnamed (but New York-evocative) metropolis. Meirelles initially mounts the film as a generic apocalyptic thriller – distant shots of traffic chaos as another victim is blinded –  before modulating into, briefly, disease-of-the-week investigation and more extensively pressure-cooker horror as the stricken are imprisoned together by jack-booted soldiers and start descending, ‘Lord of the Flies’-style, into internecine savagery among near ‘Salò’-levels of degradation.

How thin is the veneer of civilisation? That is the question here, with a supplementary query on the differing responses of men and women in the face of moral panic and necessary sacrifice.
As most of us already know the answers to both, all we’re left with is the spectacle – one of fumbling men and women reduced to foetal positions or shooting at each other in the dark. Sadly, ‘Blindness’ may realise its director’s worst fear: to produce not only an exploitation B-movie but one, paradoxically, spoiled by its own integrity and misplaced ‘artistic’ mise-en-scène and intentions.
15

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

18

UK release:

Fri Nov 21 2008

Duration:

121 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 2/5 (6 ratings)
  • I really don't understand the situation where the government just throw all of these blind people into a derelict hospital! I understand that It could work in the novel but the film makes out to be set in a 'nomal word' and to send everyone into the hospital makes no sense whatsoever! All of the blind were too content with the situation and not one perosn really asked what was going on, where were the doctorrs? Can't believe how angry this film made me. pathetic.

    Tom Thu Nov 4 2010
    Report
  • To judge whether a movie on grounds of morality and if people would actually do something or not is pure stupidity. You can never say about human character. Why does everybody have a problem with the movie's alegorical tone? I think it is the tone that defines the movie. Its a great movie directed by Fernando in his signature style, I give the movie a thumbs up.

    Anirudh Sat Jul 3 2010
    Report
  • Worst movie I have ever wasted time on, d director & actors should all go blind! (pun intended)

    neo Wed Feb 17 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • This is not an easy movie. Its main problem is that the director chooses to shoot this in English with a solid part of the crew being Amrican actors (out of which Julianne Moore shines). That sets expectations for a Hollywood popcorn-alike production... That is so far from the truth. This is a hard to swallow movie (based on a difficult literary masterpiece)... Alongside with "Lord of the Flies" comparison (which is strikingly obvious), I'd say that Lars von Trier "Dogville" is another similar approach. As per the content: is the human nature (under extreme circumstances) so pathetic and horriffic?... Would guess that most of times it might be. After all, any religion is trying to raise the human condition (while accepting its quite low current behaviour)...

    Razvan Wed Jan 27 2010
    Report
  • All I can say is that the author must have a very warped idea about human nature if he seriously believes that we would disintegrate into such evil,cruel and dysfunctional beasts following such an event. Equally implausible was the manner in which the majority were so easily controlled by the minority of brutish men who had but a single gun at their disposal, especially as the only sighted person who had the only real advantage was on the 'good' team. Unrealistic and repulsive depiction of mankind when put to the test

    Helen Mon Nov 9 2009
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Contrary to most reviews, the problem with this film is not in its aesthetics, but in its massive, literally in-credible plotting. Its heroine turns out to be something of a selfish dolt, more worried about "being found out" than the dignity of those she's professing to help. In context, this leads to a really stupid situation any reasonable person would have resolved even before it had arisen.

    meticulous Wed Nov 4 2009
    Report
  • Oh my goodness me...... this is the truely WORST TERRIBLE PATHETIC excuse of a film.If your thinking of giving it a go we urge you not too..... its awful.

    Laura and grant Sun Jun 28 2009
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • stupid irrelevant film. waste of time and money.

    Alex Mon Dec 15 2008
    Report
  • I saw the movie yesterday and i liked the first 3 minutes and the last 3. I am portuguese and i've tried to read saramago's books and his biggest mistake is that he assumes that 90% of the people in the world are evil and if they don't have police control they'll do the worst that they think of! that's not the world that I live in! Because if it was i'dd rather not live! But also Fernando Meireles(also in city of god, a great movie)produced scenes that are just sickening and perfectly avoidable! to be honest I didn't liked it. Not one bit.

    João S Melo Sat Nov 29 2008
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Is this the worst film I've ever seen? Possibly, had I stayed to the end. At first it's occasionally unintentionally funny as the ludicrous plot unfolds, a candidate for a Golden Turkey Award if ever there was one. Then, as all the blind people descend into degeneracy, shit on the floor, indulge in rape etc it becomes merely sickening. Who ever penned this must have a view of people so low it doesn't bear thinking about. Utter bilge, of the worst kind - the kind that thinks it's saying something 'artistic'.

    Archy Wed Nov 26 2008
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star