Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 (12A)

Film

Fantasy films

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>4/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Mon Nov 15 2010

Anyone who complained that the previous episode in the ‘Harry Potter’ saga felt too much like scene-setting for the final showdown will be equally disappointed with ‘Deathly Hallows Part 1’. A film with no beginning and no end but a whole lot of expository middle, this is the least satisfying instalment in the series since Chris Columbus folded up his director’s chair.

Bill Nighy’s dour, dandified Minister of Magic sets the tone with a barbed speech bemoaning the state of the magical nation: murders, disappearances and raids are becoming commonplace and no one, it seems, is safe. Least of all our bespectacled hero, who bids farewell to the suburbia of his youth before being whisked away in the film’s only outright action sequence, a dizzying high-speed flying-bike chase through the Dartford tunnel.

The ensuing half hour is business as usual: an entertaining balance of sorcery, slapstick and sweetness, enlivened by a handful of scary scenes and a surprisingly sadistic streak of black humour. But once the kids decide to break out on their own, setting off across the shattered English countryside on the trail of the four remaining shards of the Dark Lord Voldemort’s soul, things take a bleaker turn, and they never quite recover. Part of the problem is JK Rowling’s source material: there are too many characters, too much backstory and too many magical Mcguffins to keep track of. The episodic plot wanders as aimlessly as the children, culminating in the would-be tragic death of a character we’ve barely been introduced to.

On this evidence, the producers’ decision to cut the final movie in two feels like a mistake: despite some undoubted highlights, ‘Deathly Hallows Part 1’ feels like the weaker half of a still-promising film.
Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 4/5 (24 ratings)
  • don't like harry potter films this one ok

    Anonymous Wed Nov 16 2011
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • I could 'nt agree more with ex i think its essential to read the books first in fact i wonder whether it would have been better if the film company had waited until J K Rowling had finished the books before the films were made,as children could then make it as scary as they want in their minds, also when each book came out all the characters from the film were imprinted on my mind, anyway im not complaining , went to see the film again & cant wait until the DVD comes out, & come on J K write some more books, PETER JAMES has taken over where she left off cant wait for his new book (one every year) J.

    j stone Sun Jan 16 2011
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Totally agree with J stone! Amazing film!!!

    Teddie_bear Thu Jan 13 2011
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • I dont know what everyones moaning about, i loved it & am going to see it again & as far as im concerned its the best one yet, the book & the films are two different things but i think they stuck to the story pretty well.

    j stone Tue Jan 11 2011
    Report
  • It didn't really pay much attention to the book and went off on a tangent, but for part 1 it ended in a good place and I can't wait to watch the last one. It's better than the last attempt at any rate.

    Kip Mud Sun Jan 9 2011
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • The film gets off to a lively start but sags horribly in the middle. The action picks up again towards the end but, to be honest, my buttocks were numb by then and I just wanted this long, long film to be over. My wife didn't think it was too bad.

    Cappybear Wed Jan 5 2011
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Not the best Potter film or first half of a film! Started out great then BOOM.... and nothing.. nothing ... nothing, dance in a tent... sitting reading a book... nothing... What happened to Ron's adventures? He returns after gaining a wand from a Snatcher.. sounds a lot more entertaining than Grainger and Potter getting all sullen. Luna getting taken.. that would have been good to watch. I understand that some things are better left 'unseen', Luke Skywalker's uncle and aunt getting blasted but this had nothing to replace anything that went on elsewhere. And now I have to wait 7 months to see if it was worth watching in the first place.

    w33v Fri Dec 31 2010
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • really good sad when dobby died

    manav Wed Dec 22 2010
    Report
  • I dont no why everyones saying this film is so bad! Ive seen it a few days ago and it is absolutly fantastic!! I totaly dont agree with people who say the film was boring. FULL OF ACTION!! I liked it so muc that Im going to see it again today!! ANYONE THINKING OF SEEING THIS... DONT BE PUT OFF BY THE OTHER COMMENTS (:!! a well deserved 5*'s from me! :)

    77isnotanumber Sun Dec 12 2010
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • OMG!! i dont no why you all think its so bad... Ive seen it 2 weeks ago and I love it!!! Its just as good as the others and I prefered it to the last two!! I liked it so much that Im going to see it again today (:! ANYONE THINKING OF SEEING THIS.... DONT BE PUT OF BY THE COMMENTS ABOVE!! a well deserved 5 stars (:!

    Alysha Sun Dec 12 2010
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star