Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (12A)

Film

Family films

migrate.29942.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>4/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Mon Jul 9 2007

A midsummer release seems inappropriate for ‘Harry 5’, with its intriguing aura of new-term blues, as a hormonally distracted Harry (Daniel Radcliffe), having escaped expulsion by the intervention of dear head Dumbledore (Michael Gambon), trudges back for a fifth year at Hogwarts carrying a burdensome weight on his more muscularly defined shoulders. But just because he’s paranoid, it doesn’t mean that they’re not out to get ’im. Irritable but resolute Harry knows by physical injury that evil Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) is gathering a new army, but his every step to recruit a rival one is dogged by the morons at the Ministry and their appointee as new headmistress, Dolores Umbridge (Imelda Staunton), a smiling villain in pink-knit twinset who nails up more interdicts than a riled Robespierre.

There’s a new director on board, and if Chris Columbus was enjoyable, Alfonso Cuarón dark, and Mike Newell aware that for all school sagas, familiarity breeds content, new helmsman David Yates is serious, almost grave. He swathes swiftly through JK Rowling’s doorstopper text with martial efficacy, clocking a crisp 138 minutes, the shortest of the series. He certainly keeps the scenes and action moving, but his no-nonsense approach leaves no time for games – please sir, can’t we play just a little Quidditch? – and the excision of scenes of lolling chat in study rooms will disappoint fans of Bunter and Tom Brown worldwide.

On the plus side, Harry gets his first, sweet screen kiss – to the warrior the spoils – from one of the increased quota of ethnic faces, cherubic new girl Cho (Katie Leung). Also, Evanna Lynch brings new, if blenched, blood with her endearing loony, Luna Lovegood; the production design is again an eclectic wonder, from the adumbrated Georgian mustiness of the secret Order of the Phoenix house to the Bazalgette-burnished tiles of the Victorian Ministry ‘Headquarters’ where stacked rows of jurors deliberate like Doges for Harry’s inquisition; and there are some spectacular CGI effects. Performances are more mature, the soundtrack (by Nicholas Hooper) less grandiose, and Yates executes some thrilling set-pieces – but, please, Mr Yates, don’t let these winds of modernity sweep too many beloved cobwebs away! Let’s hope he casts some more old-fashioned spells in part six, ‘The Half-Blood Prince’.

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 4/5 (130 ratings)
  • I thought this film was really good. But i don't think it was the best one out of all of them so i am going to give this film a well earned 4 STAR rating!

    Mary Fri Jul 27 2007
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • Honestly, I think that the young actors have come a long way from the very first movie, and developed a depth as actors - I couldn't stand Radcliff in the first one, but he has truly grown and is on his way to becoming a fine actor - I think that both Watson & the dude playing Ron (sorry forgot name) have the same potential. Truthfully, you all, lighten up. It's entertaining, well shot... I do have to agree with the deviations towards the end. When they were in the room I found myself going "why do I remember something completely different???" Personally, I could have done without Helena Bonham Carter & the very canned weird, quirky Goth type of character that seems to have become her new specialty. I used to love her as an actress.... a long time ago...

    Jennifer Fri Jul 27 2007
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • I'm a fan of Harrypotter but I don't like it,it's SOOO rabish!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Liton Thu Jul 26 2007
    Report
  • WOW!!!Harrypotter was so cool,we love horror, you should watch it.

    Maruf and Tuli Thu Jul 26 2007
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • WOW!!!Harrypotter was COOL!! we love HORROR! you should watch IT!

    Maruf and Tuli Thu Jul 26 2007
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • in the next book, snape betrays dumbledore and kills him, and in the next book,(deathly hallows),dumbledore wanted snape to kill him and voldemort dies . long story, hard to explain. order of the phoenix was rubbish compared to the actual book. horribly made. director is rubbish.

    halfbloodprince Thu Jul 26 2007
    Report
  • This outing of Harry Potter brings the audience a very dark storyline, relying much less on the displays of fantastic spells etc and concentrating more on the deeper awakenings of the main characters. Well worth watching although younger children may be worried by the special effects which are excellent, especially the dementors at the start!

    Penelope Pitstop Thu Jul 26 2007
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • This film is as good as it gets for the Potter series...not true to the book, so what, fab.

    AnAdult Thu Jul 26 2007
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Not the best Harry Potter so far...not much action! too a while get going. But overall it was good n Harry Potter is fab anyway

    Leanne Thu Jul 26 2007
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • it was utter rubbish, such high expectations for a film which just disapoints in every way possible. i expected a dramatic ending but the build up seemed not to be a build up at all. it has its good moments but overall a very overated film.

    Film Expert Thu Jul 26 2007
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star