Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (12A)

Film

Action and adventure

migrate.43944.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Sun May 18 2008

Dr Indiana Jones: a hokey, old-fashioned movie action-hero from the childhood of many film-goers who was based, back in the burgeoning summer blockbuster days of the early 1980s, on a hokey, old-fashioned movie action-hero from the childhood of director Steven Spielberg.

Yes, in case you haven’t realised, Harrison Ford is back as the university professor with a sideline in battling bad guys in a strictly archaeological context and a skill for dodging bullets and boulders in comic book fashion – without suffering a graze. Other pop-iconic inventions, like Batman, have since enjoyed the post-modern treatment at the hands of younger filmmakers like Christopher Nolan, but Spielberg avoids any nod-and-a-wink approach. There’s the odd self-referential moment that points to Indy’s age and to past plots but mostly this is played as straight as the fringe on Cate Blanchett as the villain of the piece.

It’s 1957, Jones has a good war record behind him, the Cold War is in full thrust, and fetish fans can rest easy in the knowledge that Indy has kept that hat, whip and leather jacket from his younger days. He digs them out when Mutt (Shia LaBeouf), a young lad who rides into the movie in a nod to Brando in ‘The Wild One’ – all leathers and attitude – offers Indy the challenge of hunting down the Crystal Skull of Akator.

Of course, Indy’s not alone in the search. There are Soviet agents on his trail, led by Blanchett. These are the same agents, all with that glassy stare that American movies often attribute to commies, who we’ve already seen Indy battle with on an American air field in the film’s first action set-piece. For this episode, he narrowly escapes from a nuclear test-bomb that’s detonated on a mock-up of the typical ’50s town. This is surprisingly chilling in tone and slightly recalls the creepy suburban set-up of the early scenes of Spielberg’s ‘AI’. But only Spielberg would puncture this nod at nuclear horror with a quick cut to an anodyne shot of fluffy desert animals.

The rest is familiar. There are car chases, quick sand, river pursuits, poison darts, and exotic locations from the Nevada desert to the jungles of Peru and the Amazon. The only real additions to the mix are some new characters, including Shia LaBoeuf as Indy’s younger sidekick and Ray Winstone as a companion closer to his own age, and a recourse to computer imagery that becomes less and less hidden as the film unfolds. There’s a nod to alien involvement towards the end of the film that feels out of place, and the more the film relies on spectacle, both from special effects and from production design, the more it segues from what audiences really want: human stunts and up-close combat. It’s all perfectly acceptable as a minor thrill ride – nothing more. The film doesn’t feel as punchy, amusing or as fast-paced as the best of the other three films, but it’s passable both as nostalgia and old-fashioned action-adventure that favours impossible leaps from waterfalls over psychological insights and anything in the realm of plot that you could possibly need to believe.

It’s John Hurt as an old academic buddy of Mr Jones who utters a significant line as this fourth adventure, 21 years since the last, comes to a close in a scene that’s so sentimental – even by Spielberg’s standards – that you might be shoving your fist down your throat at the very sight of it. He ponders ‘How much of human life is lost in waiting.’ Is that Mr Spielberg suggesting we shouldn’t get our hopes up over these silly things? If so, he’s definitely right. Expect little, remember that the first three films were all basic affairs, and you might just – just – avoid disappointment.

99+

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

12A

UK release:

Thu May 22 2008

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (92 ratings)
  • this film its self was good, but i was disappointed that even though the skull was guarded by the living dead they were only faught properly once. also a lot of the scenes and lifted out of the mummy films. this ark also had a close up in one of the scenes but had not relevance to the film whatsoever.

    jo Mon May 26 2008
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • This family adventure film pines back to a simpler time in movie making, where the main objective was to entertain the audience and apart from a few over the top sequences ,notably the monkey scene (not as rude as it sounds) it accomplishes this goal admirably. A fine cast on top of their game. And Ford proves that there's life in the old dog yet by putting in a well measured performance and never once looking as though he wasn't up to the task when it came to the stunt work and fight scenes. All and all a worthy addition to the Indiana Jones franchise and a cracking way to spend two hours, well worth the ever increasing ticket prices.

    Richie Sun May 25 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Indiana still rocks! Ignore the critics and go see this movie. It's swashbuckling, action-packed with the usual far-fetched, nail-biting stunts and wonderfully happy ending. Enjoy!

    Nicky from Lichfield Sun May 25 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • the film was not as good as it look to be. i rather watch the mummy than this absolutely waste of time

    sarah Sun May 25 2008
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • Was Indiana Jones ever going to rank among the best films ever made?! This film ranks for me alongside Pirates of the Caribbean II & III, Stardust, League of Extraordinary Gentlemen... i.e. Stupid, silly, tongue in cheek and cliched, but great fun. People should really stop complaining, if you expected fine art when going in to see it, you deserved what was coming!

    Jonathan Sun May 25 2008
    Report
  • It was a very bad movie. Harrison Ford is way to old. The Ailen part way very random. Shiya LaBuf looked out of place. It sucked

    Phil Sun May 25 2008
    Report
  • It had a weird plot. Harrison Ford is way to old to be Indy Jones. Sha Labuf look out of place as a greaser. It was utterly bad

    Phjil Sun May 25 2008
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • If I could give minus stars I would. This film is wrong at so many levels. It's too long by about 30 minutes. The characterisation is dreadful, beyond perhaps Indy himself. The plot line stretches belief to breaking point. The CGI near the end is overplayed to a mind-numbing degree. Laws of physics are readily put to one side as are driving-through-jungle stunts. Cate Blanchett is a silly choice as a Russian agent with a very dodgy accent. The dialogue is so bad in places (typically George Lucas I'm afraid) it is sadly funny. The pace of the film is slow with large dollops of irrelevant action to chivvy it along. The worst moment of all in the film is the Tarzan scene and subsequent landing in the jeep. Why? and equally Why are we being treated as retarded? I have just wasted 2 hours of my life and will never get those hours back again. Others have castigated this film for a very good reason. I will add my voice. Please avoid.

    freddietheone Sun May 25 2008
    Report
  • absouloutly amazing great story line i would totally see it again!

    Benji Sun May 25 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • I Think It Was A GREAT Film And Lived Up To My Expectations And I Would Watch Another Indy Film If They Were To Make A 5th And If You Liked The 1st, 2nd And 3rd Indy Films You Have Got To Like This One

    Char Sun May 25 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star