Looper (15)

Film

Joseph Gordon-Levitt, left, and Bruce Willis in Looper

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>4/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Fri Sep 7 2012

The first thing you notice is Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s face. Has the star of ‘Inception’ lost a fight with an orbital sander? His nose is oddly flat, his forehead unnaturally smooth. It’s distracting – which is a problem, because ‘Looper’ offers the kind of head-bending sci-fi that you don’t want to be distracted from. Look away, and you’ll miss something important.

The face is intentional, of course: like a futuristic take on the surgerised celebrity lookalikes in ‘LA Confidential’, Gordon-Levitt has had a digital facelift to make him resemble Bruce Willis. In fact his character, gangland assassin Joe, is destined to become Willis, drop back through a portal in time and confront his ‘current’ self. Confused? If you pay attention, you won’t be.

The plot of writer-director Rian Johnson’s third feature is far too convoluted to explain: let’s just say it involves time travel, organised crime, future terrorism, death, loss, hope, regret and genetic mutation. But it’s to Johnson’s credit that, for the attentive viewer, none of these frantic plot contortions ever becomes bewildering: ‘Looper’ lays out a wealth of clever, intriguing concepts lucidly and with precision.

Not that any of these ideas is particularly new. Both the time-travel structure and a late-arriving, even more compelling subplot involving Emily Blunt as an isolated woman with a unique child are familiar from decades of sci-fi, notably ‘The Terminator’, ‘Twelve Monkeys’ and Jerome Bixby’s wonderful 1953 short story ‘It’s a Good Life’ (memorably adapted for ‘The Twilight Zone’).

But, as with his 2005 debut ‘Brick’, it’s how Johnson organises these elements that makes ‘Looper’ special. Nothing is predictable or comfortable: both the beautifully designed world of Kansas City 2042 and the characters who inhabit it feel entirely real, but also consistently surprising and often disconcerting. As the older version of Joe, brutalised by grief and self-hatred, Willis has never played such an unsympathetic role: although both Gordon-Levitt and Blunt give strong performances, it’s Willis you’ll remember. With this and ‘Moonrise Kingdom’, he’s on a roll.

‘Looper’ isn’t the super-smart sci-fi masterpiece many had hoped for: logically, it doesn’t quite add up, and there are slow spells. But if Johnson’s main aim was to strike a balance between conceptual cleverness and multiplex thrills, he could hardly have done better. This is a hugely satisfying, enjoyable and thoughtful movie.
23

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

15

UK release:

Fri Sep 28 2012

Duration:

118 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (18 ratings)
  • Finally got round to seeing it but what a disappointment. Clever idea (too clever?) but not involving enough. All three films from this very over-rated writer/director have been a let-down.

    sticky Tue Dec 11 2012
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Heard some people saying it was a "must see" movie, so I saw it. Must say I was underwhelmed. Neither a good action movie or interestingly thought provoking. Could say it was neither here nor there but maybe that is what time travel does to you

    Ian Pollock Sun Nov 11 2012
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Fantastically bad. Only for those with masochistic tendencies.

    MikeT Sun Oct 28 2012
    Report
  • Just the sort of film Michael Haneke made Funny Games for. Terrible and quite distasteful in places in that disturbing way some modern films seem to lack morality - the child target, the constant repetitive shotgun assassinations, casually expecting us to enjoy the sight of hooded figures kneeling on tarpaulins being blasted across a field. And then we are expected to like the assassin! Why couldn't they just have beamed the victims straight into the furnace and given us all a break? I agree with others, it is an amalgam of other films, painting by numbers it is terribly acted, what a cliche the Emily Blunt character is. Painful to watch.

    Harold C Hanger Tue Oct 23 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • I really thought TimeOut film reviews were good, however if you have given the movie Loopers more than 2 stars you have lost your skills. The movie is no good: 1. The story idea is good but not well thought out in the scenes or storyline, and so amateur. 2. In a fictional movie, especially for the most part pointless like this one, there is no justification for depicting assassinating a child. 3. Bruce Willis cannot act. 4. It is neither original nor a well drafted or performed story and so not any good. Michael

    Michael Mon Oct 15 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • I think this was an attempt to make a cult sci-fi movie like Blade Runner but it didn't work. I wouldn't say it was bad just not a 4 star, 3 star more than adequate.

    jason Fri Oct 12 2012
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • This movie was wholly disappointing, I just did not care about the characters. The little kid with crazy powers was just always going to happen and was hideously cliché. It felt like Bruce Willis didn't even show up for this film. Thumbs down

    Jon Fri Oct 12 2012
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • pooper more like...another bruce willis botch up ,go back in time & shoot the writer & anyone else to do with this yarn

    roger rabbit Thu Oct 11 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Yes i agree his eyebrows are drawn on!Also if they wanted to make him look like Willis when he was younger they couldve stuck some dumbo ears with an earlobe on J.G.Levitt according to Willis' ears. In saying that J.G.Levitt done well to try and recreate Willis' acting with some spot on facial expressions & way he talks. Plot was too long. Anyway that was about it for me.Yes you can hear enthusiasm too,not! 3 star

    Ric Tue Oct 9 2012
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • Anatomy of a movie 18% terminator 15% twelve monkeys 13% timecop 12% back to the future 10% la jetee 8% timecrimes 7% butterfly effect 6 % matrix

    john o sullivan Mon Oct 8 2012
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star