Never Let Me Go (12A)

Film

Science fiction

WINDOW WATCHING Mulligan and Knightley play peekaboo

WINDOW WATCHING Mulligan and Knightley play peekaboo.

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>2/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Feb 8 2011

You wouldn’t know it from the poster campaign. You couldn’t guess it from the cast list. Even watching the film, the horrible reality is only gradually revealed. And yet it’s true: ‘Never Let Me Go’ is… a sci-fi movie.

If ever proof were needed that cultural snobbery is alive and well, it’s right here. ‘Never Let Me Go’ is a film so ashamed of its own genre trappings that it goes to extreme and illogical lengths to pretend they don’t exist. Carey Mulligan, Keira Knightley and Andrew Garfield play Kathy, Ruth and Tommy, pupils at a strange English boarding school who slowly learn that they’re being bred for a grim purpose – and one we can’t fully reveal without a spoiler…

You’ve seen this movie before, back in 2005, the same year Kazuo Ishiguro published his novel. Then it was called ‘The Island’ and masked its numerous scripting deficiencies with a series of noisy, action-packed escape scenes. No such luck here: Ishiguro’s central point about human acquiescence to the inevitability of death is powerful on the page, but on screen it’s flat and frustrating. Alex Garland’s screenplays (‘28 Days Later’, ‘Sunshine’) often feel like they were written in the same time it takes to watch the film, and this is no exception, glossing over key emotional currents like the central love triangle and draining any sense of tension from the material.

Mark Romanek’s direction is icy and uninvolved, but there are some lovely visual flourishes, and his work with the actors is solid: while Knightley flounders, Mulligan and Garfield provide the film’s few effectively intimate moments as a star-crossed victims doomed to die. The result is pretty, empty, and immediately forgettable.
42

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

12A

UK release:

Fri Jan 21 2011

Duration:

105 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (32 ratings)
  • Timeout review is pretty much on the ball. Andrew Garfield gives the standout performance but the film is let down by an illogical plot and patchy characterisation. The soupy soundtrack suggests that we're meant to find it all deeply moving but I felt detatched most of the way through. One you can postpone to watch until it comes out on DVD

    Evie Sun Feb 13 2011
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Does not try to conceal the scince fiction element, and is a beautiful film

    BobbyM Sun Feb 13 2011
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • l cannot believe this was made into a film.The book is utter tripe.

    david glowacki Sat Feb 12 2011
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • I thought the film did a really good rendition of the novel, though it was more bleak than sinister (I found the book very sinister - almost creepy). I agree that the child actors stole the show - they were amazing - but liked the adults' performances, too, particularly Andrew Garfield - very moving.

    pleased cinemagoer Sat Feb 12 2011
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • Wow! Couldnt disagree more with this review. I agree that they aren't marketing it as sci-fi but the film knew what it was, if the dialogue wasn't pushing the love triangle it was teasing out small clues as to the nature of this alternate reality. It was supposed to be a mystery that you uncovered over the course of the film right? Btw, well done for not spoiling it... then mentioning another film which used the exact same twist. This film was beautiful, poingant and incrediaby well crafted. I cant believe its not getting the love it deserves

    Ben Fri Feb 11 2011
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • I have to agree with this review. Something is missing in this film. In fact the 1st 30mins, the 3 main cast are in their early teens and played by child actors and I have to say, this was the most interesting part of the film. The rest was done in such a typical 'English' way. None of the characters had any backbone. It becomes increasingly irritating watching these 3 characters accept their fate and literally do nothing about it. No fight, no rebelling, just complete acceptance. Which I feel is just not true to life, even for us monotone apologetic English folk! This is not a film to be watched more than once.

    Tbam Fri Feb 11 2011
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • For what it's worth, I'd like to say that I couldn't disagree more with this review. I adore Ishiguro's novel, so it was with a considerable sense of relief - and a fair amount of surprise - that I found myself thoroughly impressed by Mark Romanek's vision of Never Let Me Go. Adhering to the same structure as the source material, the movie looks through the eyes and memories of Kathy H (played with heart-breaking restraint by Carey Mulligan) to follow the lives of three children as they grow up and learn that the world has a very specific, frightening fate in store for them. The writing and visual style are evidence of a sincere, intelligent (and largely successful) attempt to tell a story that confronts uncomfortable psychological truths. The performances are first-rate (for once, even Keira Knightley's canine-baring leer is well used), Rachel Portman's music memorably underscores the bleakness and Adam Kimmel's photography adds a suitable touch of other-worldliness to proceedings. Just ignore the final voiceover's redundant and explicit spelling out of one of the central themes.

    Dariush Alavi Fri Feb 11 2011
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • This is the least laugh-a-minute film on current release. A friend tried to read the book and left it unfinished, though never explained why. Now I understand. The general idea behind the storyline is perhaps a little far-fetched for the era when it was set but, then again, so was 1984 when it was written. Storyline aside, the script is good. Loathe as I am to admit it, Keira Knightley is very good. Carey Mulligan and Andrew Garfield absolutely shine. I’m not convinced this film will win any major awards, something doesn’t seem to gel. I wasn’t overly struck by the photography, and given the potential of some of the bleak settings this was a bit of a let down. Also, the characterisation of the characters when young wasn’t great. Perhaps it’s all a little far-fetched. But for its preview evening last night, screen 4 of Cineworld Chelsea was fairly full. A three star movie.

    Mike Wed Feb 9 2011
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • Its a shame, Science Fiction is such a broad church of meanings and ideas. and the preserve of off road artists and visionarys. some simply dont belong in any other genre and proudly so. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless mind is a Sci fi film-. and all the more for it. I am an inverted Snob, put JG Ballard back in Sci fi with the other scruffs! : ) ..but, am off to see the film...

    BobbyM Wed Feb 9 2011
    Report
  • Far too simplistic, weak characters and a bit of a bore really.

    kate Mon Feb 7 2011
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star