Quantum of Solace

Film

Action and adventure

685.x600.film.quantum.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Mon Oct 20 2008

Revenge is a dish best served cold. Which, along with mean and lean, is how Daniel Craig plays 007 in Marc Forster’s slightly disappointing, furiously-paced, hi-tech, slash-and-burn sequel to the more leisurely, luxurious first ‘reboot’, ‘Casino Royale’.

James Bond – you’ll have to remember his Christian name as the arrogant cad neglects to announce it – is grieving the loss of lover and betrayer Vesper Lynd (Eva Green). You’d best remember the plot – and Lynd’s necklace – of the earlier film, too, as director Forster throws us immediately, eye-smackingly into the frenetic activity and globe-traversing travel that is the angry, increasingly unorthodox, ‘soul-destroyed’ world-saving agent’s way of dealing with betrayal, grief and loss.

Eight minutes of highly impressive, parallel-edited, SFX-assisted, stunt-laden action are up before the ears, eyeballs and brain get their first momentary repose. Before then, our hero chases down Mr White in the Aston dodgem-car through Alpine tunnels. Cough or blink and you’ll miss how our bold spooks link the last film’s Le Chiffre to bug-eyed faux environmentalist Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric), a destabiliser of US backyard governments with a laughable, pudding-basin haircut-ed sidekick. Almost immediately, he hops, skips and jumps across Siena’s roofs and the horse-loving, harlequin-ed Palio crowds – and we soon follow Bond ‘running wild’ from the palatial villas of Italy to the slums of Haiti, the neo-Reifenstahl opera houses of Vienna, and the menacingly beautiful, otherworldly moonscapes and deserts of Bolivia.

So much dash, flash and thrill – so many boat chases, tight rope-dangling fight scenes, bi-plane dogfights, architectural flourishes and flat-table computer displays – there’s scant time left for character, let alone, story, fun, seduction, humour or wit. You can sense the older, traditionalist viewers wanting to go home early to take their nostalgia pills. True, there are some cute one-liners – presumably the product of Paul Haggis’s polish of Neal Purvis and Robert Wade’s screenplay taken from producer Michael G Wilson’s first inspirational treatment and itself repeatedly pencil-marked by Forster and Craig.

Also, new Bond Woman Olga Kurylenko is impressive as 007’s Latin helpmeet Camille. But, strange for a supposedly ‘humanising’ franchise, Craig’s Bond comes dangerously close to being a cipher himself: only a ‘Bourne’-again, action superhero could perform his physical feats.

It’s a cynical movie, too: half the Brit agents are double and all the US spies seem untrustworthy – save Felix Leiter, of course, whom the excellent Jeffrey Wright reprises in arguably the film’s sole sympathetic, low-key performance. (Though, intriguingly, Judi Dench’s ‘M’ has gone all maternal – couldn’t she be renamed ‘SM’, for Surrogate Mum?) Okay, maybe real life is, pace Hobbes,  brutal, nasty and short – like this movie. But can’t we sneak in the odd moment for some occasional quiet conversation, maybe even a leisurely martini or a game of baccarat, even if we can’t afford luxury rail travel or –  God forbid – some protracted, guiltless sex? Go on, Bond, next time, indulge yourself a little more. We like to watch.
99+

Comments

Add +

Release details

UK release:

Fri Oct 31 2008

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (139 ratings)
  • Believe me this film is total and utter RUBBISH. My wife and I agreed to leave after 1 hour cos it was awfully boring and painfully disappointing to watch. The music is Shit, the plot is flat and the dialogue is crap. The hand held 'video clip' type filming is hugely irritating. A wasted evening.

    Mo Thu Nov 6 2008
    Report
  • Love Bond and Craig but this didn’t work at all. The theme tune is awful, the plot is meaningless, there is no real villain, no henchmen and even at just 1.3/4 hours I got very bored with the film. Bond girl covered in oil rather than gold, old ideas. Daniel is the best Bond by miles since Sean but please sort out the next one or it could be the last Bond film ever.

    Deano Thu Nov 6 2008
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Love Bond and Craig but this didn’t work at all. The theme tune is awful, the plot is meaningless, there is no real villain, no henchmen and even at just 1.3/4 hours I got very bored with the film. Bond girl covered in oil rather than gold, old ideas. Daniel is the best Bond by miles since Sean but please sort out the next one or it could be the last Bond film ever.

    Deano Thu Nov 6 2008
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Adequate follow up to Casino Royale but ultimately inferior. Moving the traditional gunbarrel sequence to the end of the film was as disorientating as the action sequences. The lack of Bond theme diluted the action somewhat, too. For Bond 23, I ask Babs and MG Wilson too give us a From Russia With Love style epic, which lets the very talented Daniel Craig flex his acting muscles rather than just his muscles. Oh, and restore the gunbarrel sequence to its rightful place at the start of the movie.

    Chris Fitzgerald Thu Nov 6 2008
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • Huge Bond Fan. Hugely disappointed by this film. Tries to do a Bourne. A poor imitation. Daniel Craig remains an excellent Bond, possibly the best ever Bond, but he is let down by poor script and terrible editing making the whole package disjointed and sometimes confusing. Casino Royale 9.5 out of 10. Q.of S. if I am very generous, a 6 out of 10. Overall a massive, massive disappointment. Audience on the night I saw it, which was the Friday, opening night natioanlly, were very quiet when they left. Their conclusion seemed to echo mine. The story line is exremely weak. Will stop there. Will not be buying it on DVD. I have all the others. Need I say more...

    Steve Mullins Wed Nov 5 2008
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Efficient, stripped-down action thriller which, as several people have remarked, is more Bourne than Bond (hand-to-hand combat, rooftop chases, blink-and-you`ll miss-it editing, agent as ruthless killing machine etc.).

    critique Wed Nov 5 2008
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • Daniel Craig excellent. Fight scenes confusing and annoying , do they have to be cut ferociously with horse racing, oper etc ?. Also was I the only one to notice the overal muted colour ?, a visual waste of all those stunning locations.

    mori Wed Nov 5 2008
    Report
  • Traversing ropes in Tosca against a rogue agent Craig perfectly sums up in one scene what the producers are finding their achilles heel as they attempt to balance the creditably of 007 with the expectations of a stunt hungry and action yearning pubescent crowd. Bond for the 21st Century, a man who only resembles in name anything to its predesesors is uncomfortable in this light and shallowy plotted adventure but Craig himself seems to be enjoying himself, compensating for what must have been a tough childhood with numerous tough beatings and bullying of inferior opponents. Gone are the silly quips(not missed) but also the charm and the humanity of the man(sorely missed) as well an a appetite for life thats only occasionally touched on in a scene at the Bolivian Hotel. Other scenes of note would be the Opera and occasional flashes of brilliance in La Tosca. Aside from that it looks like Forster was an observer in almost every facet of production. Certainly he had no say in the script and less again in the cutting room where so little time must've been spent. People are far too precious about this character and many others make uneducated and silly comments about the franchise that objectivity should perhaps a mission in itself. Craig as Bond, not for me. But the world's most recognised secret agent has survived quiche,invisible cars and radioactive lint so one bad review from a man expecting a little bit more than a XXX redux should be no problem.

    Ray Hyland Tue Nov 4 2008
    Report
  • It is undeniable that part of the bond experience is the exciting action scenes. Although at times the fast editting seemed on the verge of losing the viewer, they actually allowed the viewer enough time to follow the sequences and in doing so really imbued a tremendous sense of tension and excitement. Behind the fast pace action scenes is a Bond film with a plot and script more intriguing and intelligent that most that have come before and certainly come a long way from the dire lows of the likes of Die Another Day. Complementing the intriguing plot was the intelligence of the script and a film which oozes style, with scenes and scenery beautifully interwoven (e.g: Tosca perfromance). Thankfully we get more from Bond these days than just more of the same hackneyed plots and camp dialogues ("my name is Bond, James Bond"), which surely people tire of? What is also more refreshing is the departure of the over-reliance of gadgets and big spaceships/boats/planes/cars, which only serve to rubbish the film

    Adam Tue Nov 4 2008
    Report
  • box office in blighty BUSTED by danny boy -all QOS haters BURN after reading this -this movie is not for petit bourgeois but for those born with style and intellect -danny boy rulez

    uk Tue Nov 4 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star