Quantum of Solace

Film

Action and adventure

685.x600.film.quantum.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Mon Oct 20 2008

Revenge is a dish best served cold. Which, along with mean and lean, is how Daniel Craig plays 007 in Marc Forster’s slightly disappointing, furiously-paced, hi-tech, slash-and-burn sequel to the more leisurely, luxurious first ‘reboot’, ‘Casino Royale’.

James Bond – you’ll have to remember his Christian name as the arrogant cad neglects to announce it – is grieving the loss of lover and betrayer Vesper Lynd (Eva Green). You’d best remember the plot – and Lynd’s necklace – of the earlier film, too, as director Forster throws us immediately, eye-smackingly into the frenetic activity and globe-traversing travel that is the angry, increasingly unorthodox, ‘soul-destroyed’ world-saving agent’s way of dealing with betrayal, grief and loss.

Eight minutes of highly impressive, parallel-edited, SFX-assisted, stunt-laden action are up before the ears, eyeballs and brain get their first momentary repose. Before then, our hero chases down Mr White in the Aston dodgem-car through Alpine tunnels. Cough or blink and you’ll miss how our bold spooks link the last film’s Le Chiffre to bug-eyed faux environmentalist Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric), a destabiliser of US backyard governments with a laughable, pudding-basin haircut-ed sidekick. Almost immediately, he hops, skips and jumps across Siena’s roofs and the horse-loving, harlequin-ed Palio crowds – and we soon follow Bond ‘running wild’ from the palatial villas of Italy to the slums of Haiti, the neo-Reifenstahl opera houses of Vienna, and the menacingly beautiful, otherworldly moonscapes and deserts of Bolivia.

So much dash, flash and thrill – so many boat chases, tight rope-dangling fight scenes, bi-plane dogfights, architectural flourishes and flat-table computer displays – there’s scant time left for character, let alone, story, fun, seduction, humour or wit. You can sense the older, traditionalist viewers wanting to go home early to take their nostalgia pills. True, there are some cute one-liners – presumably the product of Paul Haggis’s polish of Neal Purvis and Robert Wade’s screenplay taken from producer Michael G Wilson’s first inspirational treatment and itself repeatedly pencil-marked by Forster and Craig.

Also, new Bond Woman Olga Kurylenko is impressive as 007’s Latin helpmeet Camille. But, strange for a supposedly ‘humanising’ franchise, Craig’s Bond comes dangerously close to being a cipher himself: only a ‘Bourne’-again, action superhero could perform his physical feats.

It’s a cynical movie, too: half the Brit agents are double and all the US spies seem untrustworthy – save Felix Leiter, of course, whom the excellent Jeffrey Wright reprises in arguably the film’s sole sympathetic, low-key performance. (Though, intriguingly, Judi Dench’s ‘M’ has gone all maternal – couldn’t she be renamed ‘SM’, for Surrogate Mum?) Okay, maybe real life is, pace Hobbes,  brutal, nasty and short – like this movie. But can’t we sneak in the odd moment for some occasional quiet conversation, maybe even a leisurely martini or a game of baccarat, even if we can’t afford luxury rail travel or –  God forbid – some protracted, guiltless sex? Go on, Bond, next time, indulge yourself a little more. We like to watch.
99+

Comments

Add +

Release details

UK release:

Fri Oct 31, 2008

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (139 ratings)
  • * Warning! * People have indicated on here that it's not an enjoyable film because it neglects the usual Bond features. I don't agree, I wouldn't mind all the old Bond formulae being ditched if it was a good film: but it's not a good film!

    NotPremiumBond Mon Nov 3 2008
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Although this is much more action packed, a bit like the last Bourne films, it is still very enjoyable. Sure there are a couple of ridiculous scenes (the airplane and DB9 chase), and Bond is less gadget based, but it is still good fun. Maybe for the next Bond film, a more even balance between dialogue/plot and action would be better. Nevertheless if you are a fan, I would definetely go and see. Daniel Craig and Judi Dench are excellent.

    Zed&#039;s dead but Mon Nov 3 2008
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • Everyones shocked because the film wasn't like the others. In this film bond is on the run from his own people and didn't have access to gadgets. There were no one-liners because he was still deeply upset about the women he loved who died for him. The emotions were spot on by Daniel in this film, cold, dark, lonely and taking his anger out on others. Action was really intense and focused on all the details. It was much more realistic than other bond films. Daniel is the most believable bond due to his physical appearance and ferociousness. He looks like an athlete who could really do damage, unlike other bonds. Truth be told, I can imagine people saying things like "It wasn't a bond film" but I really thought it was clever and enjoyed it. I can't wait until it comes out on DVD

    David Mon Nov 3 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • I have to say I enjoyed Daniel Craig's performance in Casino Royale! After The World is Not Enough and Die Another Day Bond did require a complete overhall. Brosnan was a fantastic Bond but was given bad films after Goldeneye (Goldeneye is clearly one of the best Bonds ever!) I liked the darker, gritter Bond Craig plays but I feel that Quantum lacks the essence of a Bond film. The opening sequence is great and I like the titles and theme but after that it becomes a poor mans Bourne!!!! No gadgets, a distinct lack of women and few witty one liners. It may only be me but I feel it is not that hard to get the basics of a Bond Film right. Simple gadgets, a few judo chops, 3 bond girls, plenty of trumpets rewarding Bonds efforts with variations of John Barry's theme and a good villan with a few hentchmen to kill. Good points about Quantum, Felix Lighter's character and the performance, Judi Denches portraial of M and her exchanges with Bond and David Arnolds musical score. Things that are missing, "The Names Bond James Bond", simple gadgets i.e. a magnetic watch or a pen thats a lazer, 3 more "Bond Girls," a decent villan and lots more of John Barry's music. Quantum really does feel like a stop gap for Bond 23. Finally since when has the Bond franchise had to follow on from the last film. The Devil May Care is a Bond film in the waiting so lets get Clive Owen to play bond and do Sebastian Faulkes's book justice.

    Quarrel Mon Nov 3 2008
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Disappointing. It was more Bourne than Bond. Where is the slick sophisticated super spy that we all loved? No one seemed to have any touch of class at all in this movie. Casino Royale was good "reset" of Bond, but this has just lost the plot. Not even worth watching on TV reruns.

    SJO Mon Nov 3 2008
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Ive just come back from watching the eagerly anticipated 'Quantum of Bo-lacks' After Casino Royal I came out having watched a good action movie - not a good 'Bond' film, but a good action movie. But, I forgave them expecting the next bond film will be very much a Bond film! How utterly wrong i was! The theme at the beginning has been omitted, no gadgets, hardly any sight of the aston martin fully loaded with tricks, hardly any funny one liners, not a single sentence uttering the words, 'The names Bond, James bond,' no shaken but stirred martinis, no psychological game between Bond and the enemy, I think I could go on, but that should suffice. Daniel Craig is a good Bond and he can pull it off, but this new Bond appears to be for a new generation who can never appreciate but Bond truly is. Lastly, call me thick, but I lost the plot half an hour into it! I eventually gave up trying to understand and concentrated on the head crashing action which in some sequences was so difficult to make it, you couldnt understand what was going on with all the shakey direction! Take my advice - wait for the DVD - I certainly wont be catching the next Bond on cinema thats for sure. Finally, watch 'Taken' which is probably more Bond like than QOS!

    Irfan Mon Nov 3 2008
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • I was really disappointed! Most of the things that make a Bond film special were missing ie humour, his charisma and a good ending, were all missing. What happened to Mr White? The opening car chase and fight scenes made my eyes hurt, you couldn't really tell what was going on.

    eliza Sun Nov 2 2008
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • I’ve seen the QS twice now. I take on board all the comments about the action shots being too close and M turning up everywhere is a little unbelievable. That’s the problem. This film is trying hard to be an all action thriller and yet make Bond a truly realistic character. Recent Bonds with all the gadgets and jokes are just totally fairyland and we all know deep down its all nonsense and so enjoyed them for what they were and therefore expected the cheap laughs. But in CR they introduced us to a different Bond, a cold killer, a more realistic Spy and Man. This is taken further in QS and we now start to believe this is real life. We like this damaged Bond and feel slightly cheated that we do not get chance to see into his character in close action fight scenes and start complaining because some things, such as M turning up everywhere, are not realistic. Since when has Bond film’s been realistic? I think the clearly damaged gritty Killer bond is great and in the next film they should go further and let us into his character. In QS they didn’t quite get the balance right. However if you can remember the plot from CR you should be able to follow QS at least after two viewings. And what’s wrong with that? I like having to revisit films to understand them completely and pick up on things I didn’t quite get first time round. If I had not enjoyed it, I wouldn’t care. QUESTION Last scene Bond says to M, “ you were right in what you said about Vesperâ€� He walks off and drops the chain in the snow. What had M said that was correct??

    Rod Sun Nov 2 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Hi, just came from cinema, I found it very dissapoiting for this budget it could be better storyline. It looks like it last for 30min no more. No any particular gadgets what all 007 used to have. I would give it 3 out of 10 points...

    Andrew Sun Nov 2 2008
    Report
  • Absolutely woeful. The plot was mundane. The villains not bad enough. The editing was truly awful. All the girls were ugly. Why didn't they give us the bond theme at the start of the credits? A waste of an afternoon.

    PERFECT DAY Sun Nov 2 2008
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star