Quantum of Solace

Film

Action and adventure

685.x600.film.quantum.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Mon Oct 20 2008

Revenge is a dish best served cold. Which, along with mean and lean, is how Daniel Craig plays 007 in Marc Forster’s slightly disappointing, furiously-paced, hi-tech, slash-and-burn sequel to the more leisurely, luxurious first ‘reboot’, ‘Casino Royale’.

James Bond – you’ll have to remember his Christian name as the arrogant cad neglects to announce it – is grieving the loss of lover and betrayer Vesper Lynd (Eva Green). You’d best remember the plot – and Lynd’s necklace – of the earlier film, too, as director Forster throws us immediately, eye-smackingly into the frenetic activity and globe-traversing travel that is the angry, increasingly unorthodox, ‘soul-destroyed’ world-saving agent’s way of dealing with betrayal, grief and loss.

Eight minutes of highly impressive, parallel-edited, SFX-assisted, stunt-laden action are up before the ears, eyeballs and brain get their first momentary repose. Before then, our hero chases down Mr White in the Aston dodgem-car through Alpine tunnels. Cough or blink and you’ll miss how our bold spooks link the last film’s Le Chiffre to bug-eyed faux environmentalist Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric), a destabiliser of US backyard governments with a laughable, pudding-basin haircut-ed sidekick. Almost immediately, he hops, skips and jumps across Siena’s roofs and the horse-loving, harlequin-ed Palio crowds – and we soon follow Bond ‘running wild’ from the palatial villas of Italy to the slums of Haiti, the neo-Reifenstahl opera houses of Vienna, and the menacingly beautiful, otherworldly moonscapes and deserts of Bolivia.

So much dash, flash and thrill – so many boat chases, tight rope-dangling fight scenes, bi-plane dogfights, architectural flourishes and flat-table computer displays – there’s scant time left for character, let alone, story, fun, seduction, humour or wit. You can sense the older, traditionalist viewers wanting to go home early to take their nostalgia pills. True, there are some cute one-liners – presumably the product of Paul Haggis’s polish of Neal Purvis and Robert Wade’s screenplay taken from producer Michael G Wilson’s first inspirational treatment and itself repeatedly pencil-marked by Forster and Craig.

Also, new Bond Woman Olga Kurylenko is impressive as 007’s Latin helpmeet Camille. But, strange for a supposedly ‘humanising’ franchise, Craig’s Bond comes dangerously close to being a cipher himself: only a ‘Bourne’-again, action superhero could perform his physical feats.

It’s a cynical movie, too: half the Brit agents are double and all the US spies seem untrustworthy – save Felix Leiter, of course, whom the excellent Jeffrey Wright reprises in arguably the film’s sole sympathetic, low-key performance. (Though, intriguingly, Judi Dench’s ‘M’ has gone all maternal – couldn’t she be renamed ‘SM’, for Surrogate Mum?) Okay, maybe real life is, pace Hobbes,  brutal, nasty and short – like this movie. But can’t we sneak in the odd moment for some occasional quiet conversation, maybe even a leisurely martini or a game of baccarat, even if we can’t afford luxury rail travel or –  God forbid – some protracted, guiltless sex? Go on, Bond, next time, indulge yourself a little more. We like to watch.
99+

Comments

Add +

Release details

UK release:

Fri Oct 31 2008

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (139 ratings)
  • Not a patch on Casino Royale. This is much more of a jump-cut mess of a juvenile action flick - there's nothing in the script to keep the brain engaged and it all becomes rather boring. Very disappointing.

    Ian Sun Nov 2 2008
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Good questions, Ali, and apart from no.11 (to frame Bond??) I am clueless. Whatever people may think about the film, Daniel Craig IS Bond, in my book. Oh, James..............

    Chinois Sun Nov 2 2008
    Report
  • good film id giv it that, but not much of a plot to it... a bit of a let down to the other bond films

    oli Sun Nov 2 2008
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • This film was a big dissapointment , Casino Royale was so immersive and was the main topic of conversation with my freinds for many weeks after. This film came and went but never really started in my opinion, 2 days after watching this I have no fond memories, that is a first for a bond film. If you are planning on watching this film I advise you to wait for the DVD.

    Johnny Sun Nov 2 2008
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Excellent film, welll acted, plenty of action. As good as Casino Royale.

    Graham Sun Nov 2 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • this is the best thriller of the year so far and the year is over -almost -which makes it the best bet yet

    uk Sun Nov 2 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Quite the most pathetic villain of any Bond film. We knew he was evil because of the way he demanded the end of minimum wage legislation. The film already seems dated, with a baddie demanding payment in euros because the dollar is so weak, and lots of peak oil paranoia. The plot is weak and the action disjointed. The women around Bond are brainless bimbos, who just do as he says because of his alleged charm. Some of the locations looked very pretty, but it didn't make up for all the rest. Disappointing.

    phil mk Sun Nov 2 2008
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Great action, but too many chase scenes. Little plot. Bring back th bond humour and gadgets!

    BigAl Sun Nov 2 2008
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • You guys expect too much from a film. It is a film. A bond film. How can you say the action was badly filmed or too quick...slow motion action then????? Why comparing it with Casino Royale? I saw QOS and completely understood the plot and the story....People like to compare...but no no...that is stupid. Do you compare your car with your previous car? Do you compare a pizza with fish and chips...come on dont compare 2 films...or two stories, it is uncompatible...like comparing a PC with a Mac.....it is 2 different products. You like or dislike....but pls STOP saying it was a poor film...cos it is not....it is just that your taste isnt for that film...thats all...dont expect too much.

    Angry Sun Nov 2 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Waited half an hour for the adverts and trailers to finish only to be left bemused by a film that was plotless, badly directed and poorly shot. The action was too close to the camera and passed too quick to allow time to apreciate the stunts. A 2-2.5 seond split between angles leaves the viewer bemused and unable to follow the action. In all a total waste of a night out. Shame on the spin merchants, it doesn't live up to the hype!

    Stuart Sun Nov 2 2008
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star