Revolutionary Road (15)

Film

Drama

690.691.x480.film.revolution.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Jan 27 2009

Kate! Leo! Sam Mendes! And a Great American Novel! The stars are aligned! All known film industry computations dictate that if you combine those two from ‘Titanic’ with the British director of ‘American Beauty’ and such heavyweight literary material as Richard Yates’s 1961 novel about the breakdown of suburban dreams in 1950s Connecticut, then everyone involved should be drowning in gold statuettes come Oscar time. But, no, last week this film received not a single major nomination from the Academy, although Michael Shannon rightly received a Best Supporting Actor nod for a brilliant, brief performance that puts his co-stars in the shade.

Shannon plays a wise fool, an unhinged chorus, who speaks out loud the unsayable truths that we come to share about youthful married couple Frank (Leo DiCaprio) and April (Kate Winslet), whose marriage we observe veering from hope to tragedy. From the very beginning of the film, Mendes introduces a tussle between happiness and disappointment, leaping quickly from a jazzy, Manhattan-set scene in which the pair lock eyes on each other at a party to a few years later and a marital argument after a poor performance by April, a trained actress, in a local amateur production. Most of the film spins on this struggle between change and stasis as Frank and April struggle to be the free spirits – too ‘special’ for the suburbs – they believe themselves to be. Mendes is good at identifying small, significant moments, such as the look on Frank and April’s neighbour’s face when they announce their move to Paris: it’s as if they’ve sucked all meaning out of their friend’s small world.

This is a good, thoughtful film, directed with some subtle touches by Mendes (an unpredictable director), acted with intelligence by its leads and photographed by Roger Deakins mostly to avoid suburban clichés. But overall it fails – just – to get to the heart of its main, female character’s tragedy so that its climactic scenes feel hysterical rather than the culmination of all that’s come before. Thomas Newman’s forceful, repetitive score doesn’t help either; its refrain becomes more annoying the more you hear it. Yes, we know this is sad stuff. We don’t need constant reminders.

Winslet gives a good performance as a wife and mother desperately trying to swim against an ever-rising tide, but both she and DiCaprio are rigid at times. There’s one scene in which her character walks across her kitchen to kiss her husband like she’s striding across a West End stage. Yet this niggling sense of theatricality has its upside too, adding to the idea that performance is at the root of this couple’s lives.

This is a horror film about living on the edges of self-perception. It’s about people who are self-aware enough to have ideals and ambitions but at the same time not strong or daring enough to act on them. They have failings, but mostly – and this is something Mendes and his cast communicate very well – it’s their environment and society’s values that dictate their fate.

This is a sobering, well-observed film that doesn’t fully hit the mark but sets up enough pleasing ideas to chew on regarding ambition, marriage and ideals of how to live one’s life, individually and as a couple.
46

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

15

UK release:

Fri Jan 30 2009

Duration:

119 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (31 ratings)
  • Much like the 1950's this movie is just as boring and uninteresting. It's extremely annoying to watch expecting something to happen, and then nothing happens. I must admit the acting was good, however, that does not compensate for the sheer lack of happening in this movie. Critics can rave all they want about it, bottom line is, for the average Joe movie goer, this will be a waste of money.

    BoredAsHell Mon Jan 19 2009
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • This movie was incredibly slow and horrifically depressing. I would not recommend it to anyone. When our private screening of this film concluded we assumed it could not get any worse and it didn't but it also did not get better. The Reader was equally long and difficult to sit through; I too was looking for the Exit signs on both. Both ended in Kate essentially killing herself. Depressing and dreadfully long.

    Brooke Tue Jan 13 2009
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Genuinely wanted to enjoy this movie, still reeling a little from the slow burn of Winslet's *Little Children.* But Revolutionary Road is ultimately a boring talkfest, punctuated by unpleasant silences. I mean "dinner with your significant other's uncaccepting conservative family." I mean "where is the nearest exit?" Almost nothing happens in this movie. Winslet is awesome, as usual, and is the only thing this movie has going for it. She delivered the best she could against the plodding plot and empty characters. The storyline is erratic at best, with none of the characters or plotlines endearing at all, and the "sex" scenes solicited laughter from the audience in my theater. DiCaprio's "terrific Nicholsonian rages?" This hyperbole borders on the kind of statement used to impress a date or an editor. I joined a few fellow moviegoers outside the theater doing a grimaced shaky-fist scene, mocking DiCaprio's phone-it-in. Note to screenplay writers: insert crazy people every other scene, if you have to, just don't let you move get boring. Again to reference Nicholson, crazy people at least can be entertaining. After Milla Jovovich's *Joan of Arc,* the forgotten Madonna island movie thing with Guy Ritchie, and now this disappointing turn by Winslet, I am swearing off actress-wife/director-husband projects forever (Helena Banham-Carter is the exception that defines the rule). Finally, Thomas Newman's score, especially in the final scenes, served as a welcome relief to the incessant unaccompanied chatter of the majority of this motion picture. War-like, the dialogue in this picture was rat-a-tat-tat, rat-a-tat-tat, uncomfortable silence -- repeat. A musical accompaniment can be a wonderful tool to offer insight into a character's thoughts, and to link scenes thematically (see *The Hours* (see this instead!) or even "Star Wars" for that matter). All of these talky scenes had so much silence, that I could hear the guy crunching his nachos 50 feet away. A third of this movie is a church service. One star, and this is as much of a review of this review as the movie.

    moustache Sat Dec 27 2008
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Yeesh, a regrettable mistake. Thanks for pointing it out; I've fixed it above. Of course, I stand by the point (sorry), but that error was unfortunate. Meanwhile, MovieGuy, I was compensated for every *other* word in the review, and this was an honest mistake. Sorry. If every journo got docked for such gaffes, there's be no writers left.

    Josh Mon Dec 22 2008
    Report
  • Well Joshua Ropkort, I feel that EVERY credible critic should be able to appreciate the exquisite work of Thomas Newman on films such as "American Beauty," "The Shawshank Redemption," and "Road to Perdition." Though, I suppose it would be a lot harder to reference his accomplished career if you don't even know his name. Journalism 101 - Check you facts.....especially when criticizing someone's livelihood.

    newmanfanforever Sat Dec 20 2008
    Report
  • I'm sorry, but was this individual actually financially compensated for composing this review? Composer "Thomas Newton"? Even a cursory glance at the film's imdb page, or a fleeting familiarity with contemporary cinema in general, would reveal the composer's name to be Thomas Newman.

    MovieGuy Fri Dec 19 2008
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star