The Darjeeling Limited (15)

Film

Drama

migrate.32981.jpg

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Fri Oct 12 2007

Wilson, Brody and Schwartzman are three brothers who embark on a journey through India a year after their father’s death: they haven’t seen each other since his funeral and Wilson, the older of the three and a dominating presence, hopes that a long train journey will bring them closer together as friends and as brothers. It’s an Anderson movie from the off: the sound of The Kinks and the Stones mixed with the music of Satyajit Ray; the marriage of colour, costume and production-design to create a vivid but heightened impression of the real world; and, of course, the presence of Wilson and Bill Murray – even if Murray appears cryptically for only a few minutes as ‘The Businessman’ (most probably a reflection of the brothers’ father). As ever with Anderson's films, the comic and the melancholic work together, and while ‘Darjeeling’ is lighter on its feet than ‘The Life Aquatic’ because of its more speedy pace and the relative simplicity of its camerawork, we still encounter the familiar sight of privileged but troubled young men struggling to find a place for themselves in the shadow of their family. Does it feel like Anderson is treading water? Yes, sadly, it often does– but an optimist could rightly claim that an Anderson-shaped pool is ten times better than most in Hollywood.

There’s much in ‘Darjeeling’ that’s familiar from many other road movies: stand-offs, arguments, fights, apologies, shared experiences, lessons learnt and relationships strengthened. We discover more about each of the brothers as we go along, but there’s less of the intricate background and layering of Anderson’s other films, particularly ‘The Royal Tenenbaums’, which delighted in the complexity of its biographies. Instead, much is left to the moment and the landscape: Anderson sucks in the sights, colours and oddities of India, from the manner in which tickets are checked on the train to visits to a shoe-shiner and a holy temple. There’s a moving episode involving the funeral of a child who the brothers encounter, which allows for one of Anderson’s trademark slow dolly-shots cut to the sound of The Kinks.

As ever, Anderson’s humour is rarely laugh-out-loud, which occasionally feels awkward here: the set-up, with three depressed Americans travelling on a train in a foreign country, at least superficially calls for comedy. Instead, the effect of the film is subtle as it invites us to share in the characters’ slow transformation, culminating in a late scene in a monastery, where the boys encounter their mother, played by Anjelica Houston. Structurally, the film isn’t entirely sound, and the emotional depth of both ‘The Royal Tenenbaums’ and ‘Rushmore’ is never achieved. But ‘The Darjeeling Limited’ has much charm, is a sensitive piece, is sometimes funny and further shows Anderson to be a storyteller with a touch for the visually and aurally hip that you imagine he couldn’t shake if he tried.

The film is preceded by a superb, 12-minute short film by Anderson, ‘Hotel Chevalier’, which sketches some of the background to Schwartzman’s character, who we find in a grand Paris hotel room, alone and sombre and listening to Peter Sarstedt’s ‘Where Do You Go To (My Lovely)?’ and later contemplating sex with his semi-estranged girlfriend, played by Natalie Portman. This wistful film is sexy and romantic – an Anderson first – and is a beguiling short story. Arguably, though, it’s better than the feature that follows and fosters expectations of greatness that are never fulfilled by the main feature.

23

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

15

UK release:

Fri Nov 23 2007

Duration:

104 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (15 ratings)
  • The simplicity of my review matches the simplicity of the story line: crap.

    bored Sat Mar 6 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • With an open mind, this film is lifechanging. Open your eyes and see past the simplicity of the plot.

    muffin Sun Sep 28 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Seems to be a love-it-or-hurl-abuse at it film. For Wes, the male character is not only an emotional retard, he's a more general retarded, without the nonce to work out that going to India doesn't guarantee a spiritual breakthrough. (That said, Hull guarantees to bury all chance of one, so the logic might hold in reverse for India). The stupidity of the characters is not explored, merely exploited for laughs, and despite the stated purpose of the journy, and the general conventions for road (or train) movies, there's no evidence that anyone learns a sodding thing about themselves or anything else. A truly pointless trip. But colourful, musically great (if you like the great music), and kinda sexy. Dunno. I loved it. Perhaps it depends who you watch with?

    crispychew Sun Aug 31 2008
    Report
  • arful, boring film, was relly disapointed with it, lasted 5 minutes then fell asleep, dont waste your money

    jennie Sat Jun 14 2008
    Report
  • Not a good movie. Just plain and simple not a good movie - disjointed - not very funny - just not convincing on any level it tried to be on. Avoid.

    James Tue May 20 2008
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • I watched this film last night, hahahah it reminded me of my family, the odd little quirks they had, and how they affected each other. It's well worth watching !!!!

    Nelly Thu May 15 2008
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • I was hoping to see more of India in this movie, but the places are barely explored. They get out of the train, try to have a spiritual experience, and get back in. The flim never corrects their clueless assumption that all you have to do is go to the right place, and use the right feather, and your life will be fixed. The only Indian that has more than one line is, of course, a pretty lady who serves as the token romance part. That India is merely a backdrop to the interaction between the brothers might be acceptable if I cared at all about their story or if any of it was funny.

    Dave Wed May 14 2008
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Best movie I saw this year. Why can't all movies be like this one. I might actually go more often. Most people won't get it though. Wonderfully simple.

    David Thu Dec 27 2007
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • this film was pathetically boring and ridiculous.. there was no storyline and point to any scene. the beginning was slightly interesting, but to find out later that it was also useless to the storyline. This film should not have reached cinemas, personally I feel this is betrayal to those who paid to watch it!

    Tanheb Wed Dec 19 2007
    Report
  • Visually adept. Occasionally charming but otherwise uneven. Overall a typical Wes Anderson movie only one that devotees would enjoy.

    Larissa Sun Dec 9 2007
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star