The Golden Compass

Film

Fantasy films

migrate.29791.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>2/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Wed Nov 28 2007

Bland, bloodless and bereft of magic, New Line’s corporate sanitisation of Philip Pullman’s exciting, provocative fantasy novel, ‘The Northern Lights’, strips the book of its humanity and soul.

Just as the church-like Magisterium and the glacially glamorous Mrs Coulter (Nicole Kidman) are rumoured to be severing pre-pubescent children from their animal daemons (an external ‘familiar’ representing their inner soul), so this clinical dissection of Pullman’s vividly imagined parallel world cuts away the warm flesh and leaves only the bare bones.

The skeleton of the plot remains, albeit in a compacted, confusing form.

While zeppelins float above an alternate Oxford’s dreaming spires, wilful 12-year-old orphan Lyra Belacqua (Dakota Blue Richards) swears to rescue her kitchen-boy friend Roger from his child-cutter abductors. Lyra’s epic quest takes her to the frozen wastes of the Arctic Circle. Here, with the help of Lord Faa’s good-hearted Gyptians, ferocious ice bear Iorek Byrnison (badly voiced by a miscast Ian McKellen), cowboy aeronaut Lee Scoresby (Sam Elliott), witch queen Serafina Pekkala (Eva Green) and a precious truth-telling instrument called an alethiometer, she confronts her enemies: the corrupt king of the ice bears, Ragnar Sturlusson (Ian McShane), the cruel Mrs Coulter (Kidman typecast as an ice queen) and hordes of Tartar henchmen.

What’s missing is any sense of Lyra’s exhilarating but perplexing journey from childhood innocence to incipient adulthood. In the book, we see everything from Lyra’s point-of-view, sharing her sense of wonder, her doubts and fears, her love for her shape-shifting daemon Pantalaimon. But like the Northern Lights themselves, glimpsed only briefly as a projected image, all this is missing. As with the scary Mrs Coulter, the film should possess, 'a scent of grown-upness, something disturbing and enticing at the same time.'

Instead, it’s a synthetic, flavourless product that lacks the subversive tang of Pullman’s source novel.

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (100 ratings)
  • shit

    reece Thu Apr 23 2009
    Report
  • I thought this was a brilliant film had not read the book but have now purchased all three! People who moan about it get high then watch it!

    Leena Fri Jan 2 2009
    Report
  • From reading all of thosse comments, and with not have reading the book, i find it very shocking and degrading how open minded people can be. The film i thought was fantastic, the magic i felt was there, but am open mind what is needed for the film, with reading Pullmans book and deciding what should happen should not effect the film as there is so much that certain cinema companies can do, if it where disney, no one would be complaining. The film i thought engaged alot of history using oxford as the college and seeing parts of the globe that many of us will never see. There should be another film to carry on with the golden compass, to conclude the film, not knowing what happens to any of the characters is just painstakingly annoying. The graphics and the detail which went into the film was amazing as the company had to create every single one of the animals and all of there movements, thats no walk in the park. There needs to be a second one, there just does as i and others need to know what happen

    Jenni Mon Nov 10 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Oh and as a firther note, i am A) not an old person, B) actually quite common and never pronounse my T's, and C) think anyone who calls the book the golden compass should get their eyes tested unless they are american because you will clearly see in pretty letters, THE NORTHEN LIGHTS, that's what it's called, if you don't like it, don't review it's film

    Joe Wed Oct 1 2008
    Report
  • As a film on its own the golden compass (wrongly named which is annoying enough) was sub-par at best with the fake english accent of 'lyra', an alright family film i suppose, but a slight insult to all those who have ever read the book. Yes we all understand that book to film = shortened content, we have all seen Lord Of The Rings, but that was still a good adaptation, this was lacking most of the real core of the book, making the film barely an echo of the fantastic literature that is The Northen Lights. I've read rumors of the second book A Subtle Knife is being made with or without Warner Brothers' (who now own the original production studio) approval, i.e. the director will go independent if Bro's says no as the film, ironically, after being named in the American title, being made in the American style, and being completely veiwed as an Aermican 'thing', did apaulingly in the American box office, serves them right maybe? Regardless i hope they DON'T make the second book into a film UNLESS they actually commit to making it resembly the book more this time, and i don't care if it ends up being another three and a half hour marathon like Lord Of The Rings, at least then it will be worth watching, besides, you could still cut it down, as it is after all a smaller book camparitively, without losing the main threads of the story AND the core sub-text of the book, and all the anti-phillip pullman's slightly athiest writing followers, you don't have to see it, so stop complaining, we don't complain when you insult those who aren't of the faith out of the blue, if you don't like it, you do have the free capacity to not see it, it's not like god tells people to go watch films, that would be excessive. And no, i'm not an atheist, so stop judging and swithing off just because i dared to speak out at you

    Joe Wed Oct 1 2008
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • I thought the film was a great fantasy film and it has done well all around the world. There was a real chemistry between Lyra and Roger. I have seen that Roger on TV before he is agreat little actor. I am looking forward to the next two films.

    gobbler Mon Jun 2 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • I found that this was a really good movie, yes some parts where mxed up but hey at least they got them in there, as for the cast I think they did a really good job and I am really looking forward to the Subtle Knife movie

    Jesse Sun May 4 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • worst film i have ever. even worse than Water World.

    maz Tue Apr 22 2008
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • What a film that was. i think you need to read the first part of the book to make it amazing but it was really good anyway. the end was absoloutly terrible but the film made up for that in the main. the firght between the bears was amazing and Pullmans idea of 'is that all you've got' was amazingly brillient. i can't wait until the next film it will be even better.

    Jamster Sat Apr 12 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • a film for films. for share. for all seasons. yeah!

    fish Mon Mar 24 2008
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star