The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (12A)

Film

Fantasy films

Hobbit, the.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Thu Dec 6 2012

Size isn’t everything, but cinema doesn’t come much bigger in scale than when Peter Jackson is telling tales. It’s a decade since the New Zealand filmmaker unveiled the last of his ‘Lord of the Rings’ films and went on to tackle the ultimate movie giant, ‘King Kong’. Now he’s back in the head of JRR Tolkien and applying the latest in technology to ‘The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey’ (3D and an untried, super-speedy frame rate of 48 frames per second – 24 is usual). It’s the first of three films to be fashioned from the professor’s novel of faux-mediaeval fantasies chronicling how a magic ring (‘the precious’) came to be in the possession of a mere hairy-footed Hobbit in the first place.

The movie may be grand, but lots of its folk are tiny, which makes for unusual juxtapositions, both odd and amusing. Bilbo Baggins (Martin Freeman, squished) is a Hobbit living the pipe-and-slippers dream in the Shire. One night, wizard Gandalf (Ian McKellen, towering over the artificially shortened Freeman) and 13 hungry dwarves – many of them with a knack for annoying the audience – come knocking and persuade Bilbo to join them on a quest to win back their kingdom. So begins a journey across wild terrain and back-to-back run-ins with vicious creatures. And all the while Bilbo is wondering what the hell he’s got himself into.

Many have wondered exactly how Jackson has found three movies in one novel. The answer is he opts for the detail and pacing of an extended TV series – an approach that has drawbacks over more than two-and-a-half hours. The initial coming-together of Bilbo and the dwarves feels overlong, and the start of their journey is sluggish and lacks a sense of momentum. There’s a tonal problem, too, as the early dominance of  knockabout comedy gives the film an alienating whiff of kids’ TV (not helped by the softly-softly, artificial look of the set for the Shire). Only a flashback showing the loss of the dwarves’ kingdom recalls how breathtaking these films can be.

It’s during the film’s final third that, at last, we feel a true sense of peril and the dwarves’ journey starts to feel purposeful. The turning point is the entry of Gollum. The more dark it becomes, the more ‘The Hobbit’ becomes compelling as a story, and finds a fitting tone. It doesn’t help that the earlier, lighter scenes (lighter in look, as well as feel) seem overexposed. Or that some outdoor scenes look rooted to a studio set – a knock-on, you assume, of the fast frame rate, which can feel like watching a movie on a shoddy HD TV.

Thank Hobbitses for Gollum, then. And thank Hobbitses for the film’s more involving later scenes, including a showdown between two stone giants and a run-in with a villain who rivals Jabba the Hutt in the beauty stakes. It’s scenes such as these that leave you looking forward to the next one rather than wanting to strangle one of the more annoying dwarves or at least bury him in a hole and leave him behind in the Shire.

34

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

12A

UK release:

Thu Dec 13 2012

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (24 ratings)
  • Definatly deserves more than 3 stars!!!!

    Emma Barber Thu Mar 14
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • If there is one thing Peter Jackson is capable of, then that is splicing togther one heck of an enjoyable fantasy epic. Martin Freeman fits the role perfectly, and Ian Mckellen looks as though he never left. These new series of films will not give the Kiwi bearded one another slice of the Oscar pie - the academy were overly generous with the Rings trilogy. It moves at a satisfying pace, but i will be interested to see how Jacko will extend the book into three films - the first one, i must admit, was stretching it. In the end, this should have been one long epic film - we shall see how it comes together with number 3. Kudos to Howard Shore for delivering another monumental piece of music.

    Jay Wed Jan 16
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • It is an amazing film!!!!!!

    ...?... Tue Jan 8
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Splendidly entertaining fantasy adventure.

    critique Mon Jan 7
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • The FIlm doesn't even deserve a written review. 1 star.

    GoodFIlms Sun Jan 6
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Well Peter Jackson, you have really messed up bad. Here's why: 1) Stiff, pathetic and poor acting - laughable performances from some 2) Visuals ok, but we've seen it all before 3) Toe-curling use of a tense Martin Freeman, who is quite obviously unhappy and wants to be somewhere else than in the shoes of Bilbo 4) Many lines read out like a weak read-through of the script caught on camera - very clunky script 5) No tension or atmosphere 6) Plasticy-looking dwarves, you can clearly see the make-up when you shouldn't be able to 7) Overlong and boring as a Christmas cracker joke. Overall The Hobbit was pretentious, pompous and pathetic. Words I would never want to speak about Jackson, a very talented director and the man behind the excellent Fellowship of the Ring. Two Towers was good, Return of the King disappointing but I still thought it was ok. Hobbit was an embarrassment to LOTR, a trilogy I very much admired in certain ways. I hope the team will give the audience what they deserve in the next film... If you TRULY loved The Fellowship, then you would join me in condeming this mess of a film. Or, you can fool yourselves... for a bit. 4/10

    TheFellowship Sun Jan 6
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Far too long. Not enough action. Attention span wandered as I got bored.

    ida Sun Jan 6
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • Well I was expecting a boring slow start! THERE WASN'T ONE!!!!!!! I went to see this film in IMAX 3D and it blew me away, when you go and see a movie in 3D it often ruins it but this one made it better, like all the lord of the rings it blows you away right from the word go, the sounds were perfect the picture was amazing and gripping and all the way through the film I was totally in a magical world somewhere in Middle Earth. Martin Freeman plays an excellent Bilbo and Richard Armitage has the brave strong face to play thorin. the story is extremely gripping and Gollum once again does not disappoint like always. I cant wait until the next two GO AND SEE IT NOW!!!!b4 and a half stars

    TREGGLE2000 Sun Jan 6
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • I've just seen the film and after reading all the negative ratings, I didn't set my sights to high but I loved the entire fim! i found no problems with the quality and came out of the cinema looking forward to the next film! I havn't read the books because I got bored but now i have seen this amazing film i am definately going to!!

    dizzy Sat Jan 5
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • I don't quite understand the harsh review this movie is getting here. I watched it to times, and when you can accept that they changed the story quite a bit (as they did with the Lord of the Rings, btw), it's a very enjoyable film. I don't understand why they made it into 3 movies either, but to be honest I think it works better than I expected, and I can't wait for the other two. I also think it's ridiculous that the time reviewer complains about the movie beeing too light and similiar to kids-TV, when the book is clearly a childrens book. It's not the Lord of the Rings, and it shouldn't be.

    Yenala Sat Jan 5
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star