The Master (15)

Film

Drama

Master, the.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>5/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Mon Sep 3 2012

Paul Thomas Anderson’s ‘The Master’ riffs on the early roots and allure of Scientology with the same compelling strangeness and heady intensity that the American writer-director of ‘Boogie Nights’ and ‘Magnolia’ brought to his last film, ‘There Will Be Blood’. ‘The Master’ is another tale of warped power and fanatical delusions, and it sees Anderson on captivating form as a director who is able to surprise and impress with scene after scene.

Some of the pre-release talk about ‘The Master’ sought to distance its gaze from Scientology, but the film is less equivocal: the organisation depicted here by Anderson may be called The Cause and its leader Lancaster Dodd (played with a frenzied, red-nosed exuberance by Philip Seymour Hoffman), but Dodd is clearly modelled on L Ron Hubbard, from his physical appearance and his eccentric theories to his claims to be a writer, a scientist and much else besides. The parallels are many, and the disguise is so thin as to barely exist.

But you can understand why Anderson didn’t want to get too bogged down in facts. His interest is as much emotional and psychological as historical. He creates a totally beguiling character, Freddie Quell (Joaquin Phoenix), to lead us in and out of Dodd’s bizarre world. We meet Quell at the end of World War II, a disturbed sailor obsessed with drinking and sexual fantasies (images of him and colleagues frolicking on a beach look like a Bruce Weber photo shoot gone rogue). Phoenix plays Quell with an alienating intensity; he’s unpredictable from the first frame to the last.

It’s through Quell that we meet Dodd, an amiable patriarch and leader of a small band of followers afloat on a ship, who takes this unhinged loner under his wing, and applies to him the methodology of The Cause, indulging his troubled mind and propensity for violence. Most of the drama unfolds over a few months in 1950, first on the boat and later at the house of a patron in Philadelphia, although scenes of Quell going through ‘processing’ (an intense form of analysis) inspire flashbacks to earlier days.

‘The Master’ is driven by a spare, jaunty and eccentric score by Radiohead’s Jonny Greenwood. Anderson dominates the rarely-used 65mm format – his close-ups are overwhelming and his longer shots are deep and layered, even seeming 3D-like at their most inventive, with colours and detail brilliantly evoked. Hoffman and Phoenix are at the top of their game, with Phoenix giving a hunched, deranged turn that flits between a childish search for acceptance and a hair-trigger air of violence.

As a depiction of a burgeoning religion, it’s like a portrait of Jesus from the perspective of one of the lesser known disciples: the Gospel According to Quell. We learn that Dodd is a bacchanalian figure, fond of fun and power, prone to extreme anger when challenged and adept at extracting funds and time from his loyal supporters. Anderson asks: why do men such as Dodd and Quell come together? What do they need from each other? How do they sustain each other’s fantasies?

His answers partly lie in a portrait of the needy meeting the powerful. But there are also suggestions of more inscrutable psychological and sexual motives for such alliances. It’s also a commanding portrait of America at a very particular point in time: Anderson may keep his drama close to a few key characters, but he also offers a strong, disturbing sense of a world turned upside down by war and of a chaos that allows the strange new order of The Cause to emerge.

51

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

15

UK release:

Fri Nov 2, 2012

Duration:

144 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (32 ratings)
  • Anderson has decided to allow character alone to sustain his film and has forfeited the reader's involvement. When the French novelists (and some film makers) of the 50's and 60's tried desperately to overcome the limitations of a narrative driven by character and plot, they attempted, with varying success, to substitute the reader (or viewer) as the source of creative impetus for the text. This meant providing sufficient visual stimulus to provoke the reader's responses, thereby allowing the reader's (viewer's) emotions to participate in the construction of the drama. Anderson has shaped two characters of great promise but whose interaction remains essentially unchanged and unprovocative throughout. As a result the film provides little or no stimulus through which the viewer can engage in the construction of the narrative. The viewer as spectator may work for comic strip film but in the absence of dramatic plot the audience must share in the creation of the film.

    Leon Wed Nov 21 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • OooHhh! awkward petty furious luxurious futile lunatic funny uncomfortable loving son-of-a-gun-good film. Good Film.

    Phil Ince Wed Nov 21 2012
    Report
  • Did Dave Calhoun see the same heap of excrement I've just had the misfortune to watch? This movie is utter boredom. It has only ran 1 week at my local cinema and I'm not surprised as some great stars are wasted in this bland tedious story. I wouldn't follow the Master if he bribed me a zillion quid as he has as much charisma (in the film) as used toiletroll. AVOID

    long cat Wed Nov 21 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • This one of the worst bits of cinematography I have ever watched. The cinema was empty except for a few people, who were asleep. Some mediocre acting. This film should be banned and never again viewed in the civilized world. P.S Age rating incorrect full of obscene nudity that added nothing to the film and mindless swearing.

    jack Wed Nov 21 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • "Intoxicated", Jay says and that's an lovely word to describe the effect of The Master. Don't expect a biography of L Ron Hubbard or a simple demolition of Scientology; neither one appears in the film.

    Phil Ince Tue Nov 20 2012
    Report
  • the new Timeout freebie mag is GREAT! My bath has a leak and it fits just perfect to catch the drips

    bobby Tue Nov 20 2012
    Report
  • Agree with above that the acting is brilliant, not only from Hoffman and Phoenix, but others in the cast as well (possibly Oscar nominations) However, the film left you wondering how 2hours 20 mins could be filled with such tosh (a word overheard from an elderly lady at the the same showing)

    H &amp; M Tue Nov 20 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Really depressing watching Joaquin Pheonix trying so hard to add heart to such a dreadful piece of schoolboy trash.

    eve Tue Nov 20 2012
    Report
  • Great acting ....... wasted. what a dreary soup of tosh.

    bill Tue Nov 20 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • The Master is unmastered by me!Clapham Picture House is always a joy to visit.But the film was strange difficult even with great 'performances' by Hoffman and Phoenix. I wondered had I been duped but reading the above I was not alone.It appear on the site

    chrisppy Mon Nov 19 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star