The Spirit (12A)

Film

Action and adventure

692.x480.film.spirit.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>1/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>2/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Fri Jan 2 2009

For all the grumbling about the state of modern cinema, Hollywood tends to get it right a fair percentage of the time: however crass, noisy and infantile the average blockbuster may be, they also tend to be entertaining, escapist and efficient. But every once in a while a genuine turkey escapes the coop, bereft of charm or wit, utterly lacking in technical prowess, integrity or intelligence. ‘The Spirit’ is such a film.

Adapting from his mentor Will Eisner’s much loved superhero strip, writer-director Frank Miller flies solo for the first time following his debut partnering Robert Rodriguez on the crude, overhyped fanboy favourite ‘Sin City’. ‘The Spirit’ is clearly cut from the same cloth, utilising the same headache-inducing, ripped-from-the-page graphic style and employing a similar cast of grim heroes, outrageous supervillains and scantily clad, largely interchangeable women.

The story, such as it is, unfolds in the battered urban landscape of Central City, where the eponymous indestructible crimefighter (unremarkable newcomer Gabriel Macht) and his jocular nemesis The Octopus (Samuel L Jackson) struggle for possession of a vase containing the blood of Greek demigod Hercules, abetted by a parade of hapless lovelies: Eva Mendes’s self absorbed jewel thief Sand Serif, Sarah Paulson’s drab nice girl Ellen and Scarlett Johanssen in a thankless, irrelevant role as evil sidekick Silken Floss.

Miller directs with stunning ineptitude, shooting entire scenes in close-up without ever establishing the location, flashing from monochrome to colour without warning or reason, keeping his action sequences as perfunctory as possible to make way for endless, excruciating scenes of exposition. His work as a writer is, if anything, even worse, throwing in pretentious, portentous voiceovers, hammy gold-tinted flashbacks and repeated attempts at slapstick and comic wordplay which, without exception, fall deadeningly flat. A few scenes – such as the one where Jackson and Johanssen dress up as Nazis for no apparent reason – threaten to spill over into outright drug-induced camp, but Miller lacks the imagination to take them beyond simply bizarre and annoying.

In the world of graphic novels, Frank Miller is king: a fine visual storyteller with an unimpeachable canon. Let’s hope ‘The Spirit’ puts an end to his moviemaking ambitions before that impressive record is irrevocably besmirched.

32

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

12A

UK release:

Fri Jan 2 2009

Duration:

102 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 2/5 (18 ratings)
  • I know I am way late with this response, but I only just saw The Spirit. Come on guys, how can anyone who has an open mind find this film a sad depiction of a graphic novel? You have completely missed the point and I recommend you stick with watching mainstream movies that push no technical boundaries. You poor bastards. Better luck next life. Btw my IQ is well over 131.

    Graphic Mon May 2 2011
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • I do enjoy watching film adaptations of comics even when they seem to meander through the plots and focus to heavily on the style of shots however I couldn't have expected this film to be as bad as it was. I've sat through bad films just to find out what happens in the end but eventually all I could do was laugh halfway through the film at the irrelevant screenplay. Word of Wisdom, if it's a couple of people who can't even watch the film through then maybe it's them, if it's near everyone then it's probably you. By the way I did not know that you had to be intelligent to enjoy watching a crap film. It's a boring feature length monologue crammed with poor special effects and over stylised camera shots.

    phil Sun Jan 3 2010
    Report
  • I watched this movie last night, and today went online reading reviews in hopes that somebody else could offer an explanation as to why this movie was ever made. It was so perfectly completely bad that there wasn't even anything laughable or interesting in it's badness. That's a feat - I'm having trouble thinking of any other movie that was so blandly poor that was all bad without crossing into the territory of "good-bad". What an utter waste of time.

    KR Mon Sep 14 2009
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • I have admired Scarlett Johansson - her natural beauty and her natural charisma, but her role in this movie actually made her seem repugnant. Ha! Impossible you say, thats how bad the movie was!

    henry Sun May 24 2009
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • The biggest shame here is that the movie shared nothing in common with the Will Eisner strip in terms of style, tone, look and feel, and violence level. The original strips are well written, designed and constructed. They were subtle and the COLOR DESIGN was great too. I guess I am getting on in years. But I cringe to think that a generation of young people out there think of this movie as the main representation of "The Spirit." What a mess. Why was Frank Miller chosen for this project?

    Erik Sun Mar 15 2009
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • this is the worst flim i have every seen. it was on unbearable in fact i walk out on the movie thats how bad it was.

    Apple Pie Mon Jan 19 2009
    Report
  • i really enjoyed the film. however i can see its not for everyone. in short its not your classic superhero movie. expect a comic book, on screen. basically, thats why its cheesy somtimes, and perhaps things don't go in convention with "normal" films. if you go in with a compleatly open mind, you may not find it horrific. but as i say, clearly not everyones cup of tea.

    Purple_vodka Sat Jan 17 2009
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Word of Wisdom, I have an IQ of 131, I still found this film complete drivel. Role Models is a film that doesnt pretend to be anything other than silly toilet humour, and doesn't try to be anything else, its funny at parts but lets face it, is never going to win an oscsar. This film however has no redeeming features, apart from when it ends. That was a relief. I can only guess that the people positive comment work for the films production/promotion team.

    Tom Wed Jan 14 2009
    Report
  • this film is awesome best film ever hands down

    pacman Wed Jan 14 2009
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • ..."crude, overhyped fanboy favourite ‘Sin City’" - Ha, what!? Sin City is anything but crude. I think the technical grand prize at Cannes knocks that one on the head Mr Huddlestone!

    and he Wed Jan 14 2009
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star