Titanic 3D (12A)

Apr26Aditya Khanal Sharukh does not need to make it a huge issue. Whoever comes to US must go through the seritucy process, it is a normal procedure. When anyone is busted into seritucy stuff, they may be questioned, the question session may go one hour to nine hour, it all depends on how well you cooperate to the seritucy officials. In the same scenario, john abraham, Salman Khan has also gone through, but they never brought these into media so wildly, Sharukh is a normal passenger only when he goes through the airport, please request to shahrukh not to let his stardom go on top of his head. stardom has nothing to do with seritucy check. Even US president should go through it. Please donot bring minor issue into media,,, shahrukh. we know you are smart in doing advertisement.

Loved it still as good now as the first time round want to see it again has to be my all time favourite film

absolutely loved it! it was amazing in 3d too! jack and rose provide an excellent sense of love throughout the whole film! do you love someone THAT much to go down into a water filled ship to rescue them?!?!?!?!

Fantastic seeing this film again in amazing 3D. You should try and see an IMAX print it will blow you away

Nicely non intrusive 3D, mass appeal (about 6 12 ish year old's and guardian NOISILY entered during Fox fanfare, 60 sec later, not a peep for remaining 194 min, bar booby errrrr, titters!) and enjoyed it more than in 1998 (1st and only viewing) but simply too long...a 150 min treatment would have me exclaiming "Excellent!" but as it is, very good. Do I want to see it again soon? no. Next decade? yes. If that sounds like a criticism, it ain't. It's an "event" film that demands the big screen...nothing less. 7+/10

Thought it fitting to see the film on the centenary and glad I did.The 3d effects were fantastic, the film has aged very well and it blew me away as it did the first time. Winslett and Di Caprio looked so beautiful and cherubic. An amazing movie, just wish James Cameron would donate all funds raised to the relatives of the 1500 poor souls who perished that night and not line his pockets once again, he hardly needs to!

a moral venture about the immoral humanity -it improvises with time -better than all the oscar winners since despite its obvious flaws

DEAR SIR OR MADAM: It is brilliant. But the real star of this movie, I feel, would be the SPECIAL EFFECTS!!! And Kate Winslett SHOULD have won the Best Actress Oscar. ANY actor could play the part Leonard Thing played. And he was considered dishy in 1997. Even I am better looking and I'm a fat 64-year-old male. REGARDS, DES, WED-APR-11-2012.

Should have ticked the stars. It is spectacular to look at in 3D but still torture for many men.

The 3D is a bit disorientating and while the film looks all very bright; brand new and spectacular on a big screen it is still a bore to me. It is still probably half an hour too long for my taste and it hits most of the cliches in a plot that has more holes than a Swiss cheese. For me 3 stars. Two for the plot but an extra one for the overall spectacle.